Tuesday, June 10, 2003

Weblogs on PEI June 16 at the Vet College The milk meets the cream - The PEI A list meets the newbies - Now you will know the difference 10:54:54 PM    comment []

Thanks Dave SOCIAL NETWORKING, SOCIAL SOFTWARE AND THE FUTURE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT. I've been trading comments and e-mails with Gary Lawrence Murphy at Teledyn about the current craze over Social Software and Network Enablement, and how that plays into the current sorry state of Knowledge Management. A big problem with KM is that, like the six blind men feeling different parts of the elephant, the term has come to mean many different things to different people, and hence nothing at all: Academics: KM is anything that allows us to do something better in business than we can do without it Consultants: KM is an aspect of business process improvement IT People: KM is any software that concerns itself at least vaguely with databases or content management systems Librarians: KM is the new name for what special librarians have always done HR People: KM is the process surrounding non-classroom learning curricula In most organizations KM is epitomized by the corporate intranet, the extranet, community-of-practice tools, sales force automation tools, customer relationship management tools, data mining tools, decision support tools, databases purchased from outside vendors, and sometimes business research and analysis. In other words, it's certain specialized technologies and information processing roles, with a thin wrapper of 'knowledge creating' and 'knowledge-sharing' processes. Most of the organizations that have implemented KM bemoan their people's inability to find stuff, the lack of demonstrable productivity improvement, the complexity of the technology, and the absence of significant reusable 'best practice' content. Now along comes Social Networking and Social Software, also with its adherents from academia, consultancies, and IT. Beneath the torrent of hype and theory, it may reveal an important truth about KM, business, and how we learn: Social networks can provide the essential context needed to make knowledge sharing possible, valuable, efficient and effective . What are 'social networks'? They are the circles in which we make a living and connect with other people. They transcend strict delineation between personal and business (there's often overlap between the two). They transcend organizational boundaries and hierarchies (we often trust and share more with people outside our companies, and outside our business units, than those inside, and often get better value from the exchange to boot). We are beginning to suspect that the essential yet elusive lesson of the PC is also the essential lesson for KM: It's all about portability and connectivity, not about processing power or content. If we were to 'reinvent' KM as, say, Social Network Enablement , what would change? Intranet as connector and link harvester: The intranet would become a people-to-people connector instead of a content repository. It would become a 'link harvester', scanning all traffic across it and dynamically identifying connections to people and their knowledge. New tools would be needed to allow such functionality. Decentralized content, with blog as surrogate for the individual: Content would shift from centralized, shared databases to personally- or team-owned databases, journals and stories, where the owner(s) provide essential context. (See my post on The Weblog as Filing Cabinet ). Each individual's subscribable, personally-indexed Weblog would be a surrogate for the individual when s/he's not available personally. Decentralized security, organizational boundaries blurred: Organizational boundaries become irrelevant. It doesn't matter whether the person you are sharing with is a work colleague, a supplier, customer, friend or advisor, an individual or a team, inside or outside the company. You share what you know with those you trust, the same way regardless. Security would be provided at the individual level, not managed by the enterprise. The same way employees know what hard-copy documents can be shared with whom, they set up subscription access to their blog categories correspondingly. Greatly enhanced weblog functionality, emphasis on access: Today's blogs are not nearly enough to fully enable social networks. They need much more connectivity functionality. A user should be able to call up a visual of their own network, or the network of expertise corresponding to a particular subject. The tool that does this would operate much like a search engine except it would retrieve people (and links to people) instead of documents. It would also have to aggregate various means of access to those people: e-mail, voice-mail, video and whiteboard, meeting scheduling, IM, weblog subscriptions and commenting, and new means of access just being developed. And it would need some mechanism to create a 'biography' of the user by automatically summarizing the total content of their weblog. Enhanced organizational change functionality: The exhaust from the increased connectivity could be browsed and canvassed to identify organizational change opportunities. Popularity indexes could pre-sage emerging business issues needing management attention, and could be used as a key part of the performance evaluation and reward process, and to identify de facto organizational thought leaders and potential strong recruits. It could incorporate Tipping Point functionality to propagate important ideas, Power Law analysis to identify and spell employees suffering from 'network overload' , and perhaps even new "Network Traffic Analyses" to identify communication logjams and disconnects. Intriguing, and perhaps a bit scary. Four important unanswered questions: What role can Social Network Enablement and social software play in enhancing individual and organizational learning?  How do you measure and reward contributions to a network (a) by full-time knowledge workers (people in the organization, like researchers and help desk staff whose sole value is contributing to the network) and (b) by network 'players' outside the organization?  How do organizations equip and foster networks without unduly controlling their actions and membership and therefore crushing them? How do we capture summaries and abstracts of organizational conversations that occur in other than written form (voice-mail, teleconferences and meetings), so that the blog record of networks is complete? SOCIAL NETWORKING ENABLEMENT IN ACTION: AN EXAMPLE The diagram at the top of this post is repeated below, to save scrolling. Suppose you are the person in the lower right corner of this chart, the CFO of Company Y, and you need to find out about a proposed change to the tax code for Research Tax Credits. Before Social Network Enablement (SNE), you would have typed the term into the intranet search engine, checked the public IRS website or some purchased tax service your company buys, or just picked up the phone and called Jan, your accountant who works for Company X. Alas, Jan just left on a three-week vacation. Since you've implemented SNE, however, everything gets easier. You key the term into your Expertise Finder and up pops the picture below.  As you expected, Jan appears (the person depicted at the bottom of the Company X oval) but that's just the start. This Expertise Network diagram shows only the experts and connections related specifically to the subject of Research Tax Credits. It tells you that the R&D department of your company has some information on tax credits on their team blog, which they've posted to the R&D Community of Practice intranet site. It also tells you that Jan has access to this intranet site, and that this intranet site subscribes to Jan's Tax Credit blog category. It also identifies two other people at the accounting firm that have expertise on this topic, since Jan is unavailable, and a customer of both your company and your accountant, who outsources his R&D to your company and qualifies for a 'flow-through' of the Research Tax Credit and hence is very knowledgeable about how these credits work. And a supplier who sells a Tax Credit Analyzer to your accountants, and a tax credit expert advisor to your accountants who, it turns out, went to high school with you and might cough up the knowledge you want for free, are also identified. So you have lots of alternatives. In Jan's absence you can phone or e-mail or IM any of six other identified experts, or subscribe to their blogs, or buy the Tax Credit Analyzer yourself (knowing your accountants thought it good enough to buy), or tap into the R&D group's CoP tool or the accountants' extranet. Problem solved. [How to Save the World] 9:37:02 PM    comment []

Cultural Transformation - The Tipping Point - Another View Here is a graphic from the Cultural Creatives. It shows the passage from equilibrium to transformation. We see the signs or harbingers of change as the swings in the state of equilibrium increase in amplitude. Instability in weather, in markets, in mood in any modality are all signs of impending system change. Then come the point of "criticality" or the Tipping Point. You die, fall back or breakthrough. Example - Air Canada's response to the discount threat. Will AC die, fall back and die or breakthrough. This is the choice we all have at these times. Will your organization see the turbulence for what it is - a harbinger of structural change - or ignore it and merely try harder to keep on the old track. Will Robin and I miss the signs of what Cancer offers us or also fall back. Not small stuff when you take it off the abstract and think of your own life!   11:55:54 AM    comment []

Understanding Cosmic Creativity. Elisabet Sahtouris on shifts in humanity's collective consciousness: We must collectively recognize what western science is only now discovering: that humanity and the rest of our living world are embedded within a far greater and fundamentally different reality than is encompassed by our current scientific worldview or paradigm. We are replacing the view of a non-living material/ electromagnetic universe with a greater non-physical reality of conscious intelligence as the never-ending source of scientifically known energy and mattera cosmic source that has been known in many human cultures from ancient times. It is fundamentally conscious and creative, transforming or transmuting into material universes and other creative ventures. As Nobel laureate biologist George Wald of Harvard put it, "The stuff of the universe is mind stuff." Once this greater, consciously intelligent reality is acknowledged as existing both within and around us, we will recognize that we collectively co-create our experienced daily reality from our individual consciousness fields, from our collective beliefs about reality, including the belief that what we see or measure with instruments is all there is. [Ming the Mechanic] Right on! Robin has been suffering a great deal from the side effects of chemo. In desparation she has gone to an energy practitoner here on PEI. Within days she is feeling better. Quackery? Mind over matter? I don't think so. If you take an electro cardiagram - you will see that we have a field of energy. Hold your palm up to another person's and you will sense the field. At dinner with friends, see how close you can get to all of the party one by one. You will find that you both have a field. You may also find that this field has collapsed with the one that you love. I think that this is connected to intention. When we deeply wish for something - it often happens. Our thinking creates our world. Homo Noeticus is a term I heard first from Caroline Myss. HN would be a group of people who are aware of these energetic powers and who can strt to use them consciously. She thinks that such a group may the the next step in evolution. I wonder? What was it like to be the first humans to have an effective language? It was only 45,000 years ago. What happened? A huge breakout in art, culture and innovation. It was also the end of Neanderthal. Does such a group exist already? I think so. How big is this group? Maybe 50 million according to the book the Cultural Creatives. What is holding us back? We are not linked - we are anti group anyway. Maybe blogging and social software may help?   10:30:46 AM    comment []