Fred Sampson's Radio Weblog
What forest? What trees?

 















Contact Fred:




View Fred Sampson's profile on LinkedIn

UXnet



I listen to IT Conversations


iPodderX


Subscribe to "Fred Sampson's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.























 

 

  Friday, July 28, 2006


Once upon a time, my elevator speech consisted of something like "Helping to see the forest for the trees." But I never felt entirely comfortable with it; which is more important, the forest, or the trees?

Today, Tom Peters, once again, hits the nail with his head:

Everything That's Not Important. . .  We often "miss the forest for the trees." Nice saying, but it too misses the boat, damn it. My point here is damned profound. We count spines and create a rowing chronology and miss ... The Whole Damn Point. . . 

All I ask is: Think about it ... Every Damn Day. "Forests" and "Trees," sure[~]but the essence of life, professional and personal, is more like it. [The Tom Peters Weblog]

Read Tom's entire post, especially the long Steinbeck quotation.

So now, in honor of this revelation, I have updated the tag line for this blog; from now on, it's: "What forest? What trees?" Which is not to say that neither is important, just that there's more, much more.

8:32:23 PM    Questions? Comments? Flames? []

"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future."


7:32:32 PM    Questions? Comments? Flames? []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2002-2006 Fred Sampson.
Last update: 8/1/06; 8:54:37 PM.

July 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Jun   Aug


Search this site:



Fred's Blogroll