Seb's Open Research
Pointers and thoughts on the evolution of knowledge sharing
and social software, collected by Sébastien Paquet

Webfeed (?)
email me


Home
Introduction
My keywords
My popular pieces
Stories and articles
2002 weekly archives
2003 weekly archives
2004 weekly archives
Neighborhood tour
Technorati cosmos
Blogstreet profile
Today's referers
Seb's home


My other weblogs:
Many-to-Many: Social Software groupblog
My public mailbox
My 'Quantum Bits' blog
En français SVP!


Topicroll:
Montreal, QC
Syndication
Musiclogging
Group-forming
Social Software
Augmented Social Net
Emergent Democracy
New webloggers
TopicExchange
Edblogging
KMPings
Wiki


Communities:
open-education
SocialSoftwareAlliance
Research Blogs
group-forming
Ryze
K-Logs
IAWiki
KmWiki
Ko4ting
Meatball
ThinkCycle
Kairosnews
ShouldExist
PhDweblogs
infoAnarchy
RSS MEETUP
Minciu Sodas
First Monday
Blog MEETUP
missingmatter
ThoughtStorms
ConstellationW3
AmSci E-Prints
Weblog Kitchen
Knowledge Board
Weblogs at Harvard
EduBlogging Network
NewCivilizationNetwork
Reputations Research
Transdisciplinarity
Know-How Wiki
PlanetMath
LoveBlog
YULBlog


Teams:
 
Flickr
StreamLine
JC Perreault
SocialDynamX
Smart Mobs
Socialtext
Blue Oxen
OpenFlows
Fleabyte
Idéactif
iXmédia
Thot
Edge
sosoblog
Web Tools- Learning
OpenAccessScholarship


People:
 
with a weblog


Spike Hall
Chris Dent
John Baez
Bill Tozier
Erik Duval
Clay Shirky
Jill Walker
Jim McGee
David Tosh
danah boyd
Sylvie Noël
John Taylor



Ton Zijlstra
Joseph Hart
Ed Bilodeau
Peter Suber
David Deutsch
David Brake
Steve Cayzer
Lilia Efimova
Mark Hemphill
Alex Halavais
Mike Axelrod
Paul Resnick
Cosma Shalizi
Andrew Odlyzko
Lance Fortnow
Tom Munnecke
Henk Ellermann
Mark Bernstein
Jeremy Hiebert
Jacques Distler
Michael Nielsen
Thomas N. Burg
Hassan Masum
Ian Glendinning
Marc Eisenstadt
George Siemens
Howard Rheingold
Stephen Downes
John Bethencourt
Sebastian Fiedler
Kevin Schofield
José Luis Orihuela
Martin Terre Blanche
Elizabeth Lane Lawley
Paul Cox
Jon Udell
Don Park
*Alf Eaton
Lion Kimbro
Phil Wolff
Jay Cross
Julian Elvé
Matt Webb
Adina Levin
*Marc Canter
Matt Mower
Kevin Kelly
Dina Mehta
Greg Searle
Ross Dawson
Al Delgado
Rajesh Jain
Lee Bryant
Jesse Hirsh
David Sifry
Jeff Bridges
Stowe Boyd
Walter Chaw
Piers Young
Barbara Ray
Dave Pollard
Ian McKellen
Josep Cavallé
Hylton Jolliffe
Lucas Gonze
Jerry Michalski
Chris Corrigan
Boris Anthony
Michael Fagan
Mary Messall
Denham Grey
*Ross Mayfield
*Phillip Pearson
Whiskey River
David Gurteen
Tom Portante
Chris Wenham
Pierre Omidyar
Stuart Henshall
Greg Costikyan
David Gammel
Renee Hopkins

Peter Van Dijk
Peter Lindberg
Michael Balzary
Steven Johnson
Robert Paterson
Eugene Eric Kim
Jason Lefkowitz
*Flemming Funch
Bernie DeKoven
Edward De Bono
Maciej Ceglowski
Charles Cameron
Christopher Allen
*Philippe Beaudoin
Richard MacManus
The Homeless Guy
Ward Cunningham
Hossein Derakhshan
Stewart Butterfield
Stefano Mazzocchi
Evan Henshaw-Plath
Gary Lawrence Murphy
Karl Dubost
*Dolores Tam
Norbert Viau
Patrick Plante
Daniel Lemay
Sylvain Carle
Bertrand Paquet - Hydro-Québec
Michel Dumais
Mario Asselin
Robert Grégoire
Roberto Gauvin
Clément Laberge
Stéphane Allaire
Gilles Beauchamp
Jean-Luc Raymond
 
without a weblog
Steve Lawrence
Simon B. Shum
Stevan Harnad
Brian Martin
John Suler
Christopher Alexander
Johanne Saint-Charles
Douglas Hofstadter
John Seely Brown
Murray Gell-Mann
Steve Newcomb
Howard Gardner
Anthony Judge
Patrick Lambe
Donald Knuth
Phil Agre
Jim Pitman
Chris Kimble
Peter Russell
Roger Schank
Howard Bloom
John McCarthy
John C. Thomas
Doug Engelbart
Seymour Papert
Hossein Arsham
W. Brian Arthur
N. David Mermin
Tommaso Toffoli
 
offline
Brian Eno
Will Wright
Jean Leloup
Daniel Boucher
Daniel Bélanger
Laurence J. Peter
Plume Latraverse
 
dead
George Pólya
Thomas Kuhn
Edsger Dijkstra
Hermann Hesse
Abraham Maslow
Benjamin Franklin
Shiyali Ranganathan
Andrey Kolmogorov
Jiddu Krishnamurti
Georges Brassens
Bertrand Russell
Astor Piazzolla
Kurt Cobain
Socrates


Resources:
Google Search
Fagan Finder Blogs


Googlism
Google Glossary
Dictionary.com
Thesaurus.com
WordNet


NEC ResearchIndex
arXiv.org e-prints
SEP Bibliography
citebase search


Complexity Digest
Principia Cybernetica


All Consuming
Audioscrobbler
gnod musicmap
Logical Fallacies
W3C Link Checker
Wayback Machine
RemindMe Service


Music streams:
Radio Tango Argentino
Boombastic Radio
secret-sound-service
Limbik Frequencies
Radio Paradise
lounge-radio
Magnatune
Accuradio
Phishcast
SomaFM
WeFunk
kohina
KPIG
shoutcast streams
electronic streams index


Quotes


Subscribe with Bloglines





Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

Tuesday, October 08, 2002
 
Evolvability is key

dive into mark - RSS and evolvable formats. Quote: "Designed formats start out strong and improve logarithmically. Evolvable formats start out weak and improve exponentially. RSS 2.0 is not the perfect syndication format, just the best one that's also currently practical. Infrastructure built on evolvable formats will always be partially incomplete, partially wrong and ultimately better designed than its competition." [Serious Instructional Technology]

Reminds me of something I wrote back in July. Perfection is so passé.


What do you think? []  links to this post    4:50:27 PM  


Peace through Play. Peace through Play - "for transforming the Culture of Violence into a Culture of Peace by realising the inborn creative potential in children, young people, yourself" [...] In young children at play there is at times discernible a quietude and calm as though they possessed a deep, private and distant existence, which is just beyond the observer's understanding. [DeepFUN Weblog]

I fondly recall the moments in my youth when I felt that way. I can sometimes get back into that mood, but the world of adults, with all its "seriousness", is taxing on my ability to remain there for long. I should perhaps hang out with children more. Any childrens' blogs out there?


What do you think? []  links to this post    4:45:44 PM  
Bottleneck holders beware

'Fry cooks and pastry chefs aren't interchangeable.'. In The Death of the Newspaper at Teal Sunglasses, Chuq Von Rospach takes on some recent commentary about the online publishing, editors, and professionalism, responding to my post over the weekend prompted by C.W. Nevius's Chronicle column (whew! tracking these threads is hard work!). [...]

Chuq detects defensiveness on the part of those currently in control of the bottlenecks:

[T]his change scares the hell out of those who currently hold a choke hold on the neck of these processes because what is really changing here is that the role of the person that makes that decision. Right now, they have an effective veto power. ... If they don't [make good decisions], these new technologies allow their audience to go around them, render them irrelevant.

[Radio Free Blogistan]

The observation holds for all kinds of publishing, including the academic variety. If many good researchers in a field start blogging seriously, they might make boards of editors irrelevant by collectively giving people a better means to assess which contributions they should take seriously.


What do you think? []  links to this post    4:40:07 PM  


Much food for thought at Blogging News today. Hylton at Blogging News continues to do a wonderful job of rounding up interesting commentary from the blog world. [...] [Radio Free Blogistan]
What do you think? []  links to this post    4:32:16 PM  
A faceted classification standard

XFML 1.0 (CORE) Published today. [Curiouser and curiouser!]

Does this have the same purpose as XTM (topic maps)? What are the differences?


What do you think? []  links to this post    4:19:26 PM  


Water - Slush - Ice, and a slice.

The metaphor describes how innovations go from ideas to implemented projects. Here's a diagram that illustrates this process:

water to ice:

Weblogs are an excellent example of a "highly networked community that encourages innovation." The water to ice metaphor describes a way to move these ideas from interesting conversation to successful projects.

» Interesting piece from back in July by Andy Chen [Kumquat's musings]

I'm not sure yet whether idea management is a leaky pipe, but if it is then knowledge logs are, as Andy says, a very good way to handle the water-slush-ice transition.

Andy's weblog is new to me, but chock full of interesting ideas and insights.  I'll be reading more.

[Curiouser and curiouser!]

I have to agree - it is extremely interesting.


What do you think? []  links to this post    3:59:55 PM  


both2and: "Evolutionary psychology is a fascinating and deeply dodgy field. And unbiased, pan-cultural scientific evidence is extremely difficult to come by. It sure is entertaining watching them try, though! Proceed with caution, though: there be dragons."


What do you think? []  links to this post    3:42:10 PM  
Around the Blogosphere in 20 Links

[Kiplog] A pretty good, timely list. Can you guess who's on the photo at the right? If you know all of them you qualify as a true blog addict.


What do you think? []  links to this post    3:35:39 PM  


The Rise of Online Panhandling. [kuro5hin.org]

Online panhandlers don't bother me in the least.


What do you think? []  links to this post    3:00:48 PM  
Faceted classification of weblog posts

Faceted Radio weblog demo.

This is pretty exciting.

I've just exported an XFML version of my weblog to facetmap.com so that you can browse my weblog by-liveTopics and drill-down by Date of Publication (e.g. start at 2002, drill-down into May, drill-down into 23rd May).

If you go to:

http://facetmap.com/demo/browse.jsp?map=curiouserandcuriouser&;;v=1

You will see an example faceted browsing interface. It's basic but quite functional.

You will see two "facets"

  • The liveTopics facet contains all my regular topics in a big old list (with number of posts in parens)
  • The Date of Publication facet contains one topic 2002

Underneath you will see the "top 10" pages at this point.

If you drill down into either facet (please try drilling down into 2002 first) you narrow the range of available posts to display. Keep drilling down via and notice how this restricts the liveTopics that are displayed in the other facet to only those used in posts that are still available in your selected date range.

Now start to think about other ways of chopping your weblog than just "Date of Publication"

[Curiouser and curiouser!]

Way to go, Matt! (Read my earlier notes on facets in case you can't make heads or tails of this.)


What do you think? []  links to this post    2:54:45 PM  


Personal Knowledge Publishing and its Uses in Research. Detailed analysis, history and discussion of weblogging as it is (or can be) used in research. The purpose of this article is to "help you grasp the significance of this practice and better understand how you might benefit from getting involved in personal knowledge publishing."

The author - correctly, I think - points to the phenomenon of "personal knowledge publishing" as having "grown out of weblogging" and is "at the beginning of a growth curve that could make it an important vehicle for sharing knowledge and fueling innovation in years to come." [Refer][Research][Reflect]

[OLDaily]

I've put a fair amount of effort into that piece, so I hope readers will forgive me for compulsively linking to it to stimulate its circulation a little bit. Of course I think it's worth reading, otherwise I wouldn't have put it on the Web.


What do you think? []  links to this post    2:48:19 PM  
"Buy my software and good luck."

Read Darwin -When Bad Things Happen to Good Ideas - KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT.

Quote: "It's all part of changing your culture. And if you don't change your culture, you'll never manage your knowledge--and KM will truly be a bust. "

Comment: I make a connection between this piece and Stephen Downes' observation here:

"Everybody is talking about learner centered learning. And yet (as Levy argues) e-learning is intended to promote corporate objectives. There is an inconsistency here."

[Serious Instructional Technology]

The Darwin article is pretty good. I believe it paints a quite plausible picture of how it works.

"[...] vendors have made a lot of customers think of KM in terms of working forward from a tool rather than looking at their knowledge needs, figuring out how to solve them and then finding the right tool. "

A-ha. But that's what vendors are supposed to do, isn't it? I think a company should assume the responsibility of assessing its knowledge needs by itself. Natural selection will take care of those companies (and individuals) who can't or won't do it. Here's something interesting:

At the Ritz, it's all about people sharing their experiences, says CIO Pam Angelucci. In fact, her most successful KM program uses no technology at all. It's a "green book" of best practices collected from the top performers in every department in the company, from corporate management to housekeeping. The hard-copy volume is updated annually by a vice president of quality, and the expert content is chosen based on quality scoring procedures. "[Knowledge management at Ritz-Carlton] really has little to do with any kind of technology"

To go back to Stephen Downes' observation, is there an inherent contradiction between learner-centered learning (or individual-centered KM) and corporate objectives? I'm not sure. I think it might depend on the maturity of the corporate culture, i.e. where it lies in the internal competition-collaboration spectrum.


What do you think? []  links to this post    2:40:56 PM  


Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Crokinole. Here it is, at last. Everything you ever wanted to know about Crokinole... and probably a lot you didn't. Actually, a deep resource about a most playworthy game. After you've learned everything, be sure not to miss this Canonical List of Game-Related Quotes. [DeepFUN Weblog]


What do you think? []  links to this post    1:07:54 PM  
Wikipedia: alive and kickin'

Wikipedia. the Free encyclopedia breaks 50,000 articles. For those of you who don't follow along, the Wikipedia is a Free, a multi-language, online-encyclopedia licensed under the GFDL that is created and edited by anyone and everyone. It has recently broken the 50,000 article mark (Brittanica has 85K). Wikipedia aims to one day have more and better articles than the Brittanica. Wikipedia's are currently available in 25 languages. [kuro5hin.org]

In the comments, Erik and the Cunctator have done a respectable job of defending the validity of the Wikipedia development model against the usual horde of naysayers. Another member explained pretty well what Wikipedia is good for. And from Rock Joe comes a telling comment:

People who don't trust Wikipedia just don't trust strangers.

The more time I spend on the Net, the more inclined I am to trust communities of strangers, and individual strangers provided that they have a history. (For some people it is the reverse; I suspect it's because they're not curious enough)


What do you think? []  links to this post    9:47:48 AM  
Paul Ginsparg: A Future with a View

Creating a global knowledge network.

Quote: "If we were to start from scratch today to design a quality-controlled archive and distribution system for research findings, would it be realized as a set of "electronic clones" of print journals? Could we imagine instead some form of incipient knowledge network for our research communications infrastructure? What differences should be expected in its realization for different scientific research fields? Is there an obvious alternative to the false dichotomy of "classical peer review" vs. no quality control at all? What is the proper role of governments and their funding agencies in this enterprise, and what might be the role of suitably configured professional societies? These are some of the key questions raised by the past decade of initial experience with new forms of electronic research infrastructure. In the below, I will suggest only some partial answers to the above, with more complete answers expected on the 5-10 year timescale." [Serious Instructional Technology]

I wrote about Ginsparg a couple weeks back. Here's a link in case you missed it.


What do you think? []  links to this post    9:43:57 AM  
More good Radio documentation

A sample chapter from the new O'Reilly book on blogging. [Scripting News]

Including important instructions on Backing up your Radio. If I'm not mistaken, a lot of content on Radio Userland by the same author is available here.


What do you think? []  links to this post    9:33:08 AM  


Metaphors for weblogs.

Following up on my thoughts in the previous post, I've been trying to think of a metaphor for a weblog. For the first-time viewer (particularly those not familiar with technology) there is little to distinguish a "weblog" from a "homepage" of old. So you have the stuff on the page organized by date...can't I do that manually in FrontPage? How hard is it to insert the date before I type a message? Etc.

For me, the value of "weblogging" is the whole process of reading the views of others and selecting/commenting on some of those views in my own space (for myself and for others). RSS allows me to "see" many more chunks of info than I would be able to otherwise.

So what is a metaphor for this process? Is there one? To me, a weblog is:

  • a journal
  • an editorial column
  • a URL favorites manager
  • a messenging application
  • one side of a discussion group tool
  • a news reader
  • a project management assistant
  • a knowledge repository

What is a weblog to you?

[Stand Up Eight]

Well, here's how I see my weblog. It's your interface to me, and my interface to you. (Thanks Clément!)


What do you think? []  links to this post    6:56:00 AM  


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Copyleft 2006 Sebastien Paquet.
Last update: 4/22/2006; 12:05:05 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.

October 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Sep   Nov





Syndicated content: