Seb's Open Research
Pointers and thoughts on the evolution of knowledge sharing
and social software, collected by Sébastien Paquet

Webfeed (?)
email me


Home
Introduction
My keywords
My popular pieces
Stories and articles
2002 weekly archives
2003 weekly archives
2004 weekly archives
Neighborhood tour
Technorati cosmos
Blogstreet profile
Today's referers
Seb's home


My other weblogs:
Many-to-Many: Social Software groupblog
My public mailbox
My 'Quantum Bits' blog
En français SVP!


Topicroll:
Montreal, QC
Syndication
Musiclogging
Group-forming
Social Software
Augmented Social Net
Emergent Democracy
New webloggers
TopicExchange
Edblogging
KMPings
Wiki


Communities:
open-education
SocialSoftwareAlliance
Research Blogs
group-forming
Ryze
K-Logs
IAWiki
KmWiki
Ko4ting
Meatball
ThinkCycle
Kairosnews
ShouldExist
PhDweblogs
infoAnarchy
RSS MEETUP
Minciu Sodas
First Monday
Blog MEETUP
missingmatter
ThoughtStorms
ConstellationW3
AmSci E-Prints
Weblog Kitchen
Knowledge Board
Weblogs at Harvard
EduBlogging Network
NewCivilizationNetwork
Reputations Research
Transdisciplinarity
Know-How Wiki
PlanetMath
LoveBlog
YULBlog


Teams:
 
Flickr
StreamLine
JC Perreault
SocialDynamX
Smart Mobs
Socialtext
Blue Oxen
OpenFlows
Fleabyte
Idéactif
iXmédia
Thot
Edge
sosoblog
Web Tools- Learning
OpenAccessScholarship


People:
 
with a weblog


Spike Hall
Chris Dent
John Baez
Bill Tozier
Erik Duval
Clay Shirky
Jill Walker
Jim McGee
David Tosh
danah boyd
Sylvie Noël
John Taylor



Ton Zijlstra
Joseph Hart
Ed Bilodeau
Peter Suber
David Deutsch
David Brake
Steve Cayzer
Lilia Efimova
Mark Hemphill
Alex Halavais
Mike Axelrod
Paul Resnick
Cosma Shalizi
Andrew Odlyzko
Lance Fortnow
Tom Munnecke
Henk Ellermann
Mark Bernstein
Jeremy Hiebert
Jacques Distler
Michael Nielsen
Thomas N. Burg
Hassan Masum
Ian Glendinning
Marc Eisenstadt
George Siemens
Howard Rheingold
Stephen Downes
John Bethencourt
Sebastian Fiedler
Kevin Schofield
José Luis Orihuela
Martin Terre Blanche
Elizabeth Lane Lawley
Paul Cox
Jon Udell
Don Park
*Alf Eaton
Lion Kimbro
Phil Wolff
Jay Cross
Julian Elvé
Matt Webb
Adina Levin
*Marc Canter
Matt Mower
Kevin Kelly
Dina Mehta
Greg Searle
Ross Dawson
Al Delgado
Rajesh Jain
Lee Bryant
Jesse Hirsh
David Sifry
Jeff Bridges
Stowe Boyd
Walter Chaw
Piers Young
Barbara Ray
Dave Pollard
Ian McKellen
Josep Cavallé
Hylton Jolliffe
Lucas Gonze
Jerry Michalski
Chris Corrigan
Boris Anthony
Michael Fagan
Mary Messall
Denham Grey
*Ross Mayfield
*Phillip Pearson
Whiskey River
David Gurteen
Tom Portante
Chris Wenham
Pierre Omidyar
Stuart Henshall
Greg Costikyan
David Gammel
Renee Hopkins

Peter Van Dijk
Peter Lindberg
Michael Balzary
Steven Johnson
Robert Paterson
Eugene Eric Kim
Jason Lefkowitz
*Flemming Funch
Bernie DeKoven
Edward De Bono
Maciej Ceglowski
Charles Cameron
Christopher Allen
*Philippe Beaudoin
Richard MacManus
The Homeless Guy
Ward Cunningham
Hossein Derakhshan
Stewart Butterfield
Stefano Mazzocchi
Evan Henshaw-Plath
Gary Lawrence Murphy
Karl Dubost
*Dolores Tam
Norbert Viau
Patrick Plante
Daniel Lemay
Sylvain Carle
Bertrand Paquet - Hydro-Québec
Michel Dumais
Mario Asselin
Robert Grégoire
Roberto Gauvin
Clément Laberge
Stéphane Allaire
Gilles Beauchamp
Jean-Luc Raymond
 
without a weblog
Steve Lawrence
Simon B. Shum
Stevan Harnad
Brian Martin
John Suler
Christopher Alexander
Johanne Saint-Charles
Douglas Hofstadter
John Seely Brown
Murray Gell-Mann
Steve Newcomb
Howard Gardner
Anthony Judge
Patrick Lambe
Donald Knuth
Phil Agre
Jim Pitman
Chris Kimble
Peter Russell
Roger Schank
Howard Bloom
John McCarthy
John C. Thomas
Doug Engelbart
Seymour Papert
Hossein Arsham
W. Brian Arthur
N. David Mermin
Tommaso Toffoli
 
offline
Brian Eno
Will Wright
Jean Leloup
Daniel Boucher
Daniel Bélanger
Laurence J. Peter
Plume Latraverse
 
dead
George Pólya
Thomas Kuhn
Edsger Dijkstra
Hermann Hesse
Abraham Maslow
Benjamin Franklin
Shiyali Ranganathan
Andrey Kolmogorov
Jiddu Krishnamurti
Georges Brassens
Bertrand Russell
Astor Piazzolla
Kurt Cobain
Socrates


Resources:
Google Search
Fagan Finder Blogs


Googlism
Google Glossary
Dictionary.com
Thesaurus.com
WordNet


NEC ResearchIndex
arXiv.org e-prints
SEP Bibliography
citebase search


Complexity Digest
Principia Cybernetica


All Consuming
Audioscrobbler
gnod musicmap
Logical Fallacies
W3C Link Checker
Wayback Machine
RemindMe Service


Music streams:
Radio Tango Argentino
Boombastic Radio
secret-sound-service
Limbik Frequencies
Radio Paradise
lounge-radio
Magnatune
Accuradio
Phishcast
SomaFM
WeFunk
kohina
KPIG
shoutcast streams
electronic streams index


Quotes


Subscribe with Bloglines





Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

Friday, October 11, 2002
 
Group-forming mailing list

Following the recent discussions on group-forming and a little email exchange, Eric Hanson and I are going to start a mailing list on that topic. I've written Group-Forming Mailing List, a little background document which anyone interested is encouraged to edit and improve upon. Here's a bit of what I wrote this morning:

Background

One thing that's exciting about the Internet is that it allows new communities to form at very low expense. This opens up many possibilities that were not previously available. In particular, it allows activists, thinkers, and other creative, change-oriented people to find one another, regroup, share information and learn more easily. This helps those people progress towards their goals more effectively. Successful examples of lively, focused communities include ShouldExist, InfoAnarchy, IndyMedia, and MeatBall.

Although we already see social clustering happening in certain areas, it is still difficult to create high-signal, lively groups around issues that are not (yet?) very popular or well known. We need to better understand how the process of clustering happens, in order to figure out how we can make it easier and more efficient.

People and their interactions are obviously at the center of this process. Thinking about social clustering will require us to consider individuals, motivations, and communication.

Observation and reflection are not the only means to probe this issue. We also want to try things out, experiment hands-on with new means of clustering. This way we will learn what helps people pull together and what doesn't.

The mailing list

This mailing list will be created to foster discussion both at the practical and theoretical level on such questions as:

  • How and why are new communities born?
  • How do they grow? Why and how do people learn about them and decide to participate in them?
  • How do those communities persist over time as some people leave and new ones jump in?
  • How can technology, and in particular the World Wide Web, facilitate the process of social aggregation?

I'll let you know as soon as the list is up and running.


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:48:27 AM  


An Introduction... to the hard Semantic Web... in simple Haiku.

Complex semantics... 
expressed in so many ways...
my favorite link...

By Sean B. Palmer ...,
on the 10th of October...
2002
  [OLDaily]

I like the ending:

No need to panic:
if you don't understand it...
...you're on the right track!


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:35:48 AM  
The DMOZ bottleneck

DMOZ on aggregators. "There are so many things wrong with DMOZ (it's even worse with Yahoo), they all trace back to one thing, unlike the Web, the directories don't admit competition. Once someone owns a category it's theirs until they give it up. To cure the problem every section should have at least three editors to be sure you don't have political outages. And the name of the editor should be public information."

[Scripting News]

Even then, this design is simply not agile enough. Topics have to shake free, and exist independently of those points of failure that are individual moderators and gatekeepers. I'm sure we can do better on our own. Truly decentralized self-organization will have to come into being to really solve the problem.


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:29:52 AM  


The Bead Game, Conflict Resolution and Wisdom. Quote:  "I , too, was moved by the Glass Bead Game that was described in Majester Ludi. Since then [ I had just graduated from college, many years ago] I have been actively fascinated with the possibility of constructing general representational schemas which, when understood, allow the replacement of conflict, incomprehension and fear with a wisdom which allows positive action. The possibility that large differences if bridged could result in large and positive consequences was an Aha! given to me by Hesse."

[Connectivity: Spike Hall's RU Weblog]


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:18:27 AM  
Why blog: a clear explanation

Worth of weblog-based publication?.

Clay Shirky: "Weblogs and the Mass Amateurization of Publishing. [...]

So,if there is little likely monetary reward why would one work on creating , however polished, a written summary, a body of ideas, on the web? I believe that there are rewards for doing this and they relate to making a community of understanding with those that do respond to your ideas.

As a benefit of community membership one receives relevant suggestion and criticism of her/his ideas. As another benefit, this interest-based community also provides new and related ideas from which one may continue to build her/his knowledge base. There are benefits for all. In short, be wiser and happier in your knowledge making web community, but don't quit your day job!!

[Connectivity: Spike Hall's RU Weblog]


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:14:08 AM  
On writing for others

Use of schoolblogs for students and teachers. Greg Ritter posts arguments against mindless attacks on classroom technology as a panacea. See below and links: Greg Ritter on SchoolBlogs: "Look, people, the idea that techology is a panacea is so 1997. I don't know anybody in education (or educational technology providers) who still really believes that. Everybody knows that the technology doesn't solve education's problems and, in fact, presents some entirely new ones. Everybody except the media, that is." [via schoolblogs.com] [Adam Curry: Adam Curry's Weblog]

I'd like to argue for schoolblogs as an incremental improvement over journaling. I ask you to grant me the power of journaling as a tool for advancing self-understanding and for understanding the world. Responding to life experience through writing and summarizing causes one to interlink and explain thus increasing understanding.

We now note that the writer of a weblog is aware of a potential audience that goes beyond the teacher. This awareness coupled with almost any form of the wish for understanding... has the writer developing ideas in smaller steps and with foundational explanation for the reader. Thus a fleeting impression (true or not) becomes a situated explanation and thus is better understood by the writer. Plus, of course, the self-chosen audience that reads this writer more than once and responds in similar spirity provokes further growth of the writer and has itself grown. This form of rational discourse makes communities of the mind that become with experience, effort and multiple rounds of 'listening' and 'speaking' more comprehensive with each round.

[Connectivity: Spike Hall's RU Weblog]

Very well put. There's nothing like explaining things to a general audience to help better understand them.


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:11:35 AM  


Eugene McCarthy. "Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game, and dumb enough to think it's important." [Quotes of the Day]
What do you think? []  links to this post    11:05:00 AM  
In search of universal obscenity

Some Questions on Obscene and Indecent Speech. The goal of this essay is to cause the curious reader to ponder the following questions: Does there exist a right not to be offended? Does there exist anywhere an example of someone who was injured by exposure to "obscene" or "indecent" words, images, or ideas? Does there exist a definition of "obscene" or "indecent" which is universally applicable and therefore, useful? That is, can we construct a list of all obscene, indecent or profane words, and can we say that all uses of these words are offensive by definition? Can there be no legitimate use of these words? And what about words not on the list, are they always safe? Is it possible to describe all objectionable images? Does not a specific law against obscenity itself become obscene? Are all cases of exposure to obscene or indecent material actionable? Do contracts placed upon community media producers and journalists which attempt to coerce producers into self-censorship, denote Prior Restraint, and are therefore unconstitutional under the First Amendment? [kuro5hin.org]

These are good questions.


What do you think? []  links to this post    11:03:01 AM  
Aaron and the Bookmobile

Aaron Swartz: Mr. Swartz Goes to Washington, and meets up with the Internet Archive Bookmobile.

Unlike most Bookmobiles, this one didn't contain any physical books. Instead, it connects to the Internet Archive's servers in the Presidio to download them. Then the high-speed printer prints out the pages. The chopper cuts them in half so you can fold them together to make a normal-sized book, and the binding machine heats up the glue-smeared cover to hold it all together. The whole process takes about fifteen minutes. ...

"People have a hard time understanding the public domain," Brewster says. "It's an abstract concept; it's hard to grasp. The bookmobile changes that." He picks up one of the books he's made. "This is the public domain! The public domain means giving books to children. You want to extend copyright? You want to steal books from children? No one wants to steal books from children."

[FOS News]


What do you think? []  links to this post    10:56:20 AM  
Where is knowledge?

Knowledge is embodied in people gathered in communities and networks. This is one of the most powerful descriptions of what knowledge and knowledge management should really be all about that I have ever come across. Notice 'technology' is not mentioned!

Knowledge is embodied in people gathered in communities and networks.

The road to knowledge is via people, conversations, connections and relationships.

Knowledge surfaces through dialog, all knowledge is socially mediated and access to knowledge is by connecting to people that know or know who to contact.

In the knowledge economy, connections and relationships count more than personal knowhow and access to content.

The environment changes so fast, the optimum knowledge strategy is instant access to people & their ideas and continuous awareness & learning in a supportive community.

People and discourse communities provide the 'filter' mechanism for alerting and awareness.

This helps to keep your focus, provides market intelligence and affords a platform for negotiating meaning and value.

- Denham Grey

[Gurteen Knowledge-Log]
What do you think? []  links to this post    10:50:09 AM  


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Copyleft 2006 Sebastien Paquet.
Last update: 4/22/2006; 12:05:07 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.

October 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Sep   Nov





Syndicated content: