Seb's Open Research
Pointers and thoughts on the evolution of knowledge sharing
and social software, collected by Sébastien Paquet

Webfeed (?)
email me


Home
Introduction
My keywords
My popular pieces
Stories and articles
2002 weekly archives
2003 weekly archives
2004 weekly archives
Neighborhood tour
Technorati cosmos
Blogstreet profile
Today's referers
Seb's home


My other weblogs:
Many-to-Many: Social Software groupblog
My public mailbox
My 'Quantum Bits' blog
En français SVP!


Topicroll:
Montreal, QC
Syndication
Musiclogging
Group-forming
Social Software
Augmented Social Net
Emergent Democracy
New webloggers
TopicExchange
Edblogging
KMPings
Wiki


Communities:
open-education
SocialSoftwareAlliance
Research Blogs
group-forming
Ryze
K-Logs
IAWiki
KmWiki
Ko4ting
Meatball
ThinkCycle
Kairosnews
ShouldExist
PhDweblogs
infoAnarchy
RSS MEETUP
Minciu Sodas
First Monday
Blog MEETUP
missingmatter
ThoughtStorms
ConstellationW3
AmSci E-Prints
Weblog Kitchen
Knowledge Board
Weblogs at Harvard
EduBlogging Network
NewCivilizationNetwork
Reputations Research
Transdisciplinarity
Know-How Wiki
PlanetMath
LoveBlog
YULBlog


Teams:
 
Flickr
StreamLine
JC Perreault
SocialDynamX
Smart Mobs
Socialtext
Blue Oxen
OpenFlows
Fleabyte
Idéactif
iXmédia
Thot
Edge
sosoblog
Web Tools- Learning
OpenAccessScholarship


People:
 
with a weblog


Spike Hall
Chris Dent
John Baez
Bill Tozier
Erik Duval
Clay Shirky
Jill Walker
Jim McGee
David Tosh
danah boyd
Sylvie Noël
John Taylor



Ton Zijlstra
Joseph Hart
Ed Bilodeau
Peter Suber
David Deutsch
David Brake
Steve Cayzer
Lilia Efimova
Mark Hemphill
Alex Halavais
Mike Axelrod
Paul Resnick
Cosma Shalizi
Andrew Odlyzko
Lance Fortnow
Tom Munnecke
Henk Ellermann
Mark Bernstein
Jeremy Hiebert
Jacques Distler
Michael Nielsen
Thomas N. Burg
Hassan Masum
Ian Glendinning
Marc Eisenstadt
George Siemens
Howard Rheingold
Stephen Downes
John Bethencourt
Sebastian Fiedler
Kevin Schofield
José Luis Orihuela
Martin Terre Blanche
Elizabeth Lane Lawley
Paul Cox
Jon Udell
Don Park
*Alf Eaton
Lion Kimbro
Phil Wolff
Jay Cross
Julian Elvé
Matt Webb
Adina Levin
*Marc Canter
Matt Mower
Kevin Kelly
Dina Mehta
Greg Searle
Ross Dawson
Al Delgado
Rajesh Jain
Lee Bryant
Jesse Hirsh
David Sifry
Jeff Bridges
Stowe Boyd
Walter Chaw
Piers Young
Barbara Ray
Dave Pollard
Ian McKellen
Josep Cavallé
Hylton Jolliffe
Lucas Gonze
Jerry Michalski
Chris Corrigan
Boris Anthony
Michael Fagan
Mary Messall
Denham Grey
*Ross Mayfield
*Phillip Pearson
Whiskey River
David Gurteen
Tom Portante
Chris Wenham
Pierre Omidyar
Stuart Henshall
Greg Costikyan
David Gammel
Renee Hopkins

Peter Van Dijk
Peter Lindberg
Michael Balzary
Steven Johnson
Robert Paterson
Eugene Eric Kim
Jason Lefkowitz
*Flemming Funch
Bernie DeKoven
Edward De Bono
Maciej Ceglowski
Charles Cameron
Christopher Allen
*Philippe Beaudoin
Richard MacManus
The Homeless Guy
Ward Cunningham
Hossein Derakhshan
Stewart Butterfield
Stefano Mazzocchi
Evan Henshaw-Plath
Gary Lawrence Murphy
Karl Dubost
*Dolores Tam
Norbert Viau
Patrick Plante
Daniel Lemay
Sylvain Carle
Bertrand Paquet - Hydro-Québec
Michel Dumais
Mario Asselin
Robert Grégoire
Roberto Gauvin
Clément Laberge
Stéphane Allaire
Gilles Beauchamp
Jean-Luc Raymond
 
without a weblog
Steve Lawrence
Simon B. Shum
Stevan Harnad
Brian Martin
John Suler
Christopher Alexander
Johanne Saint-Charles
Douglas Hofstadter
John Seely Brown
Murray Gell-Mann
Steve Newcomb
Howard Gardner
Anthony Judge
Patrick Lambe
Donald Knuth
Phil Agre
Jim Pitman
Chris Kimble
Peter Russell
Roger Schank
Howard Bloom
John McCarthy
John C. Thomas
Doug Engelbart
Seymour Papert
Hossein Arsham
W. Brian Arthur
N. David Mermin
Tommaso Toffoli
 
offline
Brian Eno
Will Wright
Jean Leloup
Daniel Boucher
Daniel Bélanger
Laurence J. Peter
Plume Latraverse
 
dead
George Pólya
Thomas Kuhn
Edsger Dijkstra
Hermann Hesse
Abraham Maslow
Benjamin Franklin
Shiyali Ranganathan
Andrey Kolmogorov
Jiddu Krishnamurti
Georges Brassens
Bertrand Russell
Astor Piazzolla
Kurt Cobain
Socrates


Resources:
Google Search
Fagan Finder Blogs


Googlism
Google Glossary
Dictionary.com
Thesaurus.com
WordNet


NEC ResearchIndex
arXiv.org e-prints
SEP Bibliography
citebase search


Complexity Digest
Principia Cybernetica


All Consuming
Audioscrobbler
gnod musicmap
Logical Fallacies
W3C Link Checker
Wayback Machine
RemindMe Service


Music streams:
Radio Tango Argentino
Boombastic Radio
secret-sound-service
Limbik Frequencies
Radio Paradise
lounge-radio
Magnatune
Accuradio
Phishcast
SomaFM
WeFunk
kohina
KPIG
shoutcast streams
electronic streams index


Quotes


Subscribe with Bloglines





Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

Monday, March 21, 2005
 
Information Architecture Summit: Epilogue

Okay, I'm done posting my session notes from the IA Summit 2005 in Montreal. Here's the table of contents.
I was happily surprised on the gender balance front. Many women were there, speaking as well as attending. The panel I liked best was two-thirds female. I had been struggling to pin down what it is exactly that information architects cultivate as a chief virtue. Based on what I saw there, the answer would appear to be empathy.

In a few short years this emerging area of practice has burgeoned into a full-fledged community that actually feels like a community, more so than the scholarly fields that I have frequented so far. I got a sense that the people there cared about what they do and about each other.

At the very end Jesse James Garrett delivered a short, but impassioned and poignant call to arms, enjoining the IA masses to join the blog conversation that has been and continues to shape the evolution of the field. I'm already impressed by the extent to which blogging has permeated information architecture, but it could certainly use yet more voices.

I've learned quite a bit, made new meaningful connections, and strengthened others, so the trip was worth it. Plus the freezing rain had gelled around the branches on the way back to New Brunswick - it looked quite beautiful.

What do you think? []  links to this post    4:16:35 PM  
Brett Lider: Why Amazon is Not Enough @ IA Summit

I was at the Information Architecture Summit in Montreal earlier this month and am (still!) blogging the sessions I attended.



Why Amazon is Not Enough : Towards the future of eCommerce and the Web

[SP: great talk, focused on personal technology and leveraging personal information.]

Brett Lider

I'm a loyal customer of Amazon, but I have some criticisms.

Amazon doesn't *really* know you. It knows what you bought from it. Pieces, but not enough of the whole. It is a siloed technical platform which distributes, but doesn't consume. They maximize what they have, but are approaching the limits of tradtional CRM.

Defining the Future - The Web 2.0 article on Wikipedia was clearly written by an engineer. Look at those acronyms!

Some components of Web 2.0. Social networks, desktop information, browser history, tastes and preferences - getting them documented and un-siloed, analog information

LinkedIn launched job postings. This is the beginning, but it's a lot of work. It is not enough.

Blinkx offers access to the desktop. People don't remember where they saw something - web or desktop? Google now offers access to the desktop. [SP: and Copernic, too.]

Music on the desktop. Fire up iTunes, it's all about you. It's great. Until you get into the Apple Store, and oh, it wants to sell me music.

Audioscrobbler have a tracker that records what you've played  [SP: he's blider]. It recommends other people with similar tastes. There's no commerce component. There was an undergraduate project that offers to pick up your iTunes XML record and offer recommendations. An undergraduate project. There's nothing more being done with this.   !?

A9 integrates browser history data. A9 tells me what sites I visited recently.

Web-based bookmarks: del.icio.us. Web-based archiving: Furl saves you from linkrot. Physical history data. Who, what topics? Evite has this list of all the parties you've ever been invited to, and a list of people who have been invited along with you. This is your data, why is it Evite that does this?

Delicious Library lets you curate your material goods, e.g. DVD collections. We need to increase the ROI for things like this if we want anyone other than hardcore collectors to start using them.

What is Amazon (or any eCommerce site) doing to bring these concepts to the eCommerce experience?

What if I want Yahoo, Amazon, etc., to consume *my* stuff? [SP: this sounds a lot like DataLibre]

C2B is the empowerment of customers with their past purchase and preference data, allowing them to share it when and with who they desire.

I'll present a centralized C2B system, but it could be made decentralized. C2B is one customer to many businesses. It inverts the pyramid: the user is at the top. Vendor-vendor "coopetition" for customer data is key to getting access to the superset resulting from the combination of what each vendor knows.

C2B is important. Consumers will demand a more and more personal relationship from businesses over time. Micro-markets, narrow-casting. Harvard Business Review just ran an article on C2B, hailing it as the heir to CRM.

Say Jane, knowledge worker, gets stuff from different online retailers, brick-and-mortar stores, friends, ... Recommendation-based merchandising is crappy right now. The C2B way? If the customer can send over more info about herself she can get much better recommendations, and a better relationship.

"Future" C2B: Trusted third parties, anonymizing filters.

Better Bookshelves idea. Snap a pic of your bookshelf, upload it, book spines are OCR'd, your book collection is digitized, voilà! Recommendations get better.

If customers have RSS feeds, Walmart has an incentive to rip Netflix's RSS feed and compete.

C2B is coming. It has a community of business academics around it. People are actively thinking about it as a business. It gets businesses out of data warehousing.

Amazon could be so much more. The same goes for eCommerce on the Web in general.
By being on top of this, IAs can be agents of some serious innovation. Thank you.

Q. It's difficult to find a trusted third party. Any one that is commercial or government is kinda suspect.

A. It's about the business model, you need to have one where earning trust translates into success. Financial services perhaps.

Q. This sounds like Google.

A. Just to be clear, I've just been hired by Google, but this stuff predates my hiring. [SP: I really hope they won't ask him to work behind closed doors now that he's there.]

Q. You're really saying that the customer should own their own data, and leverage that.

A. If the customer can't manage their own data,  [missed the last part]

Q. And if you don't give me my own data I won't want to be your customer.

Q.  [me] Who's going to jump first in this arena? Not Amazon, I presume.

Financial services, people like Quicken, might be willing to move in that direction. Web portals, and startups.

Q. In higher education, you could recommend courses based on what you and o

Q. I work with a company that's in the business of selling *huge* databases of customer data. This information is already circulating. [SP: but the customers are not involved and little aware]

A. The alternative is indeed much scarier.

Q. Diminishing returns on recommendations?

A. It's hard to guess what the limits are to recommendation

Q. [Lane Becker] I think this was one of the better presentations, but I think it falls down at the example level. The bookshelf picture OCR examples, there's no way I'm doing this. There's a lot of other stuff beyond recommendations.

A. Recommendations is the existing metaphor. Think about RSS feed aggregation, this is all happening.

Q. Will vendors be able to look at what other vendors do with a customer's data?

A. I don't have the answer there, it will depend on business rules and such.

Q. [Thomas] Some providers I don't care to deal with because I hate their service.

Q. Are there standards for purchase history?

A. AFAIK, hmm... There are XML, RSS, RDF, Atom, in that general area; more specialized  formats may exist, I don't know.

Brett's Powerpoint slides

Reminder to self: send Brett links to onfocus bookwatch, allconsuming, digital lifestyle aggregation

What do you think? []  links to this post    3:59:28 PM  
Applying Information Architecture to community @ IA Summit

I was at the Information Architecture Summit in Montreal earlier this month and am (still!) blogging the sessions I attended. Other people blogged the summit too.

Josh Knauer, Peter Lucas

[SP: interesting, futuristic talk, big ideas]

Most of MAYA Design funding (full disclosure here) comes from DARPA. I come from the tree-hugging, lefty side of the road. My friends were very puzzled. I'm sorta the business guy, hired to turn swords into ploughshares.

Most of the command-and-control software in Iraq right now is actually being powered by the technology I'll be showing you.

What have been the most effective ways we've had in the past to effectively spread information? We've been looking at public libraries in the US. That system was an exceptionally efficient way of providing universal public access to information. It provided perpetual storage and distribution of intellectual property, while respecting the intellectual property of publishers. They've helped with distribution and dispersion tremendously. Imagine trying to erase "Moby Dick" when there are copies in libraries everywhere. The concept if actually pretty crazy. You walk in and get out with a book without paying anything, and the publishers aren't screaming out.

In the digital age we need universal digital access to all types of information from anywhere, perpetual storage and distribution, flexibility in maintaining intellectual property (IP) rights, and logical but flexible organization structures.

The Web comes short of this. Access is limited by the original format of the data. It's difficult to combine data from multiple sources. Web pages/databases are only available as long as their owner keeps them up. No comprehensive system for dealing with IP rights. Useful info is frequently hard to find among billions of disorganized web pages.

(Note in passing that most nonprofits currently copyright the info they put on the Web, which violates laws on nonprofits.)

Look at a Google results page. Where's the IP information on the items listed in there? Look at this recent headline: "Chief Exec Pulls Plug on County Assessment Website" Truly public information was taken offline, to citizens' detriment, because of a working conflict.

Solution: Build the next generation info commons. Note that I haven't said open source. I've talked about open standards and open architecture. We would like you to buy some of our services if you want to. It's a very interesting twist on business models. This is an interesting experiment in how a private company can help build a commons.

With this commons you'll want to be able to take all the information in the world about, say, the American Goldfinch, and tag it with creator and IP information. One rule should be to completely separate your data from the user interface that will display it. Peter Lucas wrote "The Trillion-Node Network" in the late eighties, which was perceived as crazy. But now Rich Internet Applications are on the horizon, and very large numbers of devices no longer so crazy. The idea is that items might be displayed on different devices, with varied user interfaces.

The core architecture. We spent years and millions designing one large distributed peer-to-peer architecture which we refer to facetiously as "the last database". Not centrally controlled so you don't have the Napster effect. [SP: they call this replication information-liquidity.] You can't delete something once it's gone into the Commons. One layer is made of "shepherds" who move the information artifacts around nodes.

We can have pipelines out to various data sources. E.g. we regularly download stuff from the EPA. The EPA doesn't actually know about it, it's FTP activity. We have nonprofits updating stuff locally which gets transformed and cleaned and stored in the Commons.

Projects we've implemented. We've downloaded the US Toxin Database all the way back to 2000. In the future someone can go to that copy to use it for their local community. People can start connecting the dots, e.g. correlating production facilities and diseases in their locality. Just like the Library of Congress doesn't care if you connect Nietzche and some other author, this should be possible.

Our persona, Julia, is concerned about a smoke-spitting facility in her neighborhood. She fires up a map-based application, finds the plant, and sees all the toxins released over time by the plant. Figures out the health risks.

Susan James is recovering from breast cancer and pulls out cancer incidence info for her county, looks at various related info, etc. But this official info sheet has a flip side. On that other side, you could potentially rate what you saw on the front, comment, find others who also care about that item you were looking at. [SP: group-forming around common interests.]

I went to five cancer sites in the Pittsburgh area. They did not know about each other. By linking them all to the Commons, they can still exist but become connected.

Rudy Brown is a concerned consumer. He pulls out his Info Commons cell phone that scans barcodes, and gets a report on the products, based on datasets such as Material Safety Data Sheets, user-contributed ingredient lists, product bar codes, and chemical substance and health effect information.

Attribution is sacrosanct in our system. So you get accountability for the info. What about spam? Yes, this can turn into the Wild West. We are betting on community moderation.

PDF of their slides: Applying IA to community (large, around 8 MB)


What do you think? []  links to this post    2:31:58 PM  


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. Copyleft 2006 Sebastien Paquet.
Last update: 4/22/2006; 12:20:13 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.

March 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Feb   Apr





Syndicated content: