It’s worth noting that a number of standards said to be “vendor-driven” are primarily of interest to vendors. For example, another architect interviewed for this story was hands-on with WS-Security but unaware that WS-Trust plays a role in his implementation. Why? The WS-Trust protocol is spoken only between his security broker, VordelDirector, and his identity provider, Entrust (Profile, Products, Articles). The messages exchanged between his company and its Web services partner have nothing to do with WS-Trust, says Mark O’Neill, CTO of Vordel. “We and Entrust chose to use it because it’s a spec that we don’t have to work out ourselves,” he says. The WS-Security protocol used by the service end points and the WS-Trust protocol used by infrastructure components are “solving completely different problems -- it just so happens that both involve specs that begin with WS."
http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/09/12/37FEsoaevolve_4.html