Harold's Open Media Management argument
The argument for Open Media Management Interfaces 101 - by Harold Gilchrist
Media Management Systems need open methods and interfaces. Specifically, the vendor community needs to support standardized interfaces to input and output the media objects contained within their proprietary Media Management Systems. This is not to say the standard way would be only way or even the preferred way. The point is to makes the interfaces to Media Management Systems open to other's software and other systems through standardized openly published methods.
[Audioblog/Mobileblogging News]
Phil brings up some good examples: The Danger Hip-Top blogs and the Nokia 7650 Club Nokia.
Both are good examples of beneficiaries to an Open Media Management standard. Sony's Screenblast or Imagestation services and Apple iLife environments would also be obvious beneficiaries, as would Ofoto, XDrive and Ryze. Anybody who has media on-line somewhere. Even Macromedia and Adobe would benefit from this sort of open standard.
Adobe's Album product is a natural, as is Macromedia's ambitions to build 'rich internet applications.'
I'm gonna do a big post on this tomorrow.
As I keep seeing this thread I wonder whtether this is really just an evolution of existing standards that we have such as XML, XML Schema, RSS 2.0, MetaWeblog API. Better handling for streaming data types and richer semantics for binary media in MetaWeblog would be steps in the right direction.
2:23:23 PM
|