Ross Mayfield's Weblog
Markets, Technology and Musings

Categories


blog-tribe.ryze.com
(by most recent)




Search weblog
Search WWW
 

 

Tuesday, October 22, 2002
 

Scope & Span: Web Services, Loose Coupling & Functional Commoditization

The trend towards component-based software and web services is an evolution of software to realize economies of Scope and Span. 

App Servers have embraced J2EE (and MS embraced its .NET) and development frameworks have evolved to support component-based software development.  XML standards provide further functional defintions of component commodities.  Components can be functionally repurposed with minimal transaction costs, realizing economies of Scope and significant risk reduction  

Web Services goes beyond scope by leveraging XML standard interfaces and common Internet protocols to realize span in distributed architectures.  With standard definitions and interfaces, essentially becoming commoditized, components can be efficiently sequenced with low transaction costs to realize Economies fo Span. 

The value of this model is the functional commoditization.  Functional, in that the technology can be repurposed at a low transaction cost.  Commoditization, in that it has a standard definition and interface.  Add a contract and business processes to the underlying functionality and commodity and you have a service.  Functional commoditization is another way to describe Loose Coupling.

We are a long way from the vision of portfolio management of distributed software components.  Unlike managing a portfolio of financial securities, technology assets posess systemic characteristics.  A portfolio of technology assets realizes diversification benefits from both being diverse and the properties of Scope technologies.  The combinatorial value of Span technologies realizes network effects within the portfolio.

Today's evolution in software architecture towards Service Oriented Architectures marks a shift from more static systems that emphasized Speed and Scale towards dynamic systems that realize Scope and Span.  The shift is made possible by the adoption of standards, but is driven by change requirements of competitive turbulence.


11:21:58 AM    comment []

Valuation Considerations of System Economics

Continuing the thread on System Economics, today I will explore the vaulation considerations for technology assets that exhibit different economies (Speed, Scale, Scope & Span)

Economies of Speed, Scale and Span produce increasing marginal returns that can be linearly projected.  Take the example of a backbone provider that is considering the purchase of DWDM optical transport system for a single strand of fiber.  Different systems will offer different capacities per fiber strand, realizing different throughputs, or Economies of Speed.  Different systems will offer different scalability characteristics, realizing a per line card upgrade path for Economies of Scale.  Optical to Optical switching platforms can route traffic without sacrificing throughput to realize economies of sequence, or Span.  An example of a system that exhibits diseconomies of Span is below.  Provided that vendors do not offer free optionality, either in contract or technology, potential returns can be measured with linear discounted cash flow techniques such as ROI.

The only exception to the above is when vendors offer contracts or technology upgrade paths that inherently include free options.  For example, a system that provides Economies of Scale from a vendor that requires a minimal initial investment for the base platform relative to the cost of future upgrades makes the upgrade path non-linear.  Buyers could purchase the base platform with no intention of upgrading capacity with the exception of an unlikely and signficant change in traffic requirements.

Economies of Scope, however, produce increasing marginal returns that are non-linear.  Tunable lasers, for example, are a technology asset that can be repurposed as factors of production, realizing Economies of Scope.  Unlike a standard line card in a DWDM system which is built to be red, green or another specific wavelength, a tunable lazer can change wavelengths.  This enhanced modularity reduces investment risk and makes it a better choice for spares or systems with a high likelyhood of architectual change. 

What makes Economies of Scope non-linear is the options they create.  Tunable lazers are purchased almost as insurance.  If a system is populated with Tunable lazers it decreases the requirement for capital expenditures in spares and decreases operating risk of being able to fulfill services.  Repurposable assets should be valued using techniques that account for different options in use.  A Real Options methodology would be more suitable for measuring the value of a technology asset that realizes Economies of Scope.


9:28:32 AM    comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2002 Ross Mayfield.
Last update: 12/20/2002; 5:56:03 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme, but severly tweaked.
October 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Sep   Nov

<--Older | Newer-->

Subscribe to "Ross Mayfield's Weblog" in Radio UserLand. Click to see the XML version of this web page. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog. @Ryze

Subscribe by email:



Recent Posts

HotTopic Outline

Reciproll

Ecostats
Technocrati
BlogStreet
BlogTree
Blogdex
Organica
Waypath
Google
Translate
German
Spanish
French
Italian