Enterprise
The Enterprise category of Ross Mayfield's Weblog




Subscribe to "Enterprise" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

 

Monday, December 09, 2002
 

Collaborative Business Panel

This panel was interesting in that it came accross as Collaborative business being generally more depressed, compared to other areas being discussed.  That's because other areas are at the beginning of the adoption lifecycle and the guys on the panel were more immersed with the key customer issues of the day -- fixing leaky pipes.

Collaboration's proposition is that it saves people's time, above the other stuff.  Today time isn't that valuable, so you have less innovation and instead are focused on applying existing technology to leaky pipe hard cost savings problems.

  • David Weinberger, JOHO
  • John Parkinson, CGEY Americas CTO, has spent $1b
  • Narry Singh, Commerce One
  • John Hagel, Consulting & Author

Collaboration has no meaning unless you are in France where it has a very precise meaning. Lots of collaborative apps: defining best practices, document management, bug databases, open source, eBay, epinions, smart mobs, workflow apps, sales mailing list.

John P -- there is no good collaborative software. 90% of the difference is email, beyond that its hard to find a difference/impact.

John H -- why still bundle activities within enterprises? collaborative still focused on manual data processing and distribution, not enough time left over for real value added collaboration to enhance processes.

Narry -- is the mandate for collaboration at all time high? High tech is increasingly outsourcing. Now one process has many companies, not one company have many processes. Governance, incentive and dispute management is what's missing(Hard part is changing behavor, IMHO), but that's not a lack of technical development

John P -- the successes have been the bottom up developments. Too much diversity for a good answer to arise.

John H -- agrees on governance. Company most advanced in these issues is a Chinese company, LiYungFong(sp?), loosely coupled business practices because of an absence of tech. Now that web services are available they can code, but not be locked in.

Narry -- but connectivity is not collaboration.

David -- top down demands for governance counters the bottom up development

Rheingold -- dont drop the discussion of social aspects. Englebart quote: people use language, artifacts and training, but people focus on the artifacts

John P -- 3 email populations:

  • people who know how to use email
  • old folks who use others for email
  • others that dont get it

Which purposes did the collaboration tools fail in?

John P -- focus has been in KM, cant entice people to get them to use/share.

Narry -- only 5% of collaborative activity is automated. Buying fails in content (semantics) and context management (exceptions) -- where collaboration breaks.

John H -- on problems:

  1. Structuring relationships -- a business problem
  2. Coordinating day to day activities around the process itself -- info aint flowing today, tech is a barrier, web services might address this
  3. Exception handling -- not much time to deal with these issues

Dave Winer -- Yahoo Groups is good. Used Instant Outlining for collaboration.

Joi Ito -- people collaborate because they enjoy it. take a more anthropological view of technology (Joi is right in some respects, although it doesnt apply to leaky pipes -- the real opportunity is making software adapt to people and social networks, not the other way around)

John H -- aggregate IT productivity benefit specific to industries (6 in the McKinsey study, the one who were driven by a single company to change like WalMart)

Phil Wolff -- loose vs. structured? social software and unstructured solutions that are being widely adopted transitioning to structured world?

Narry: you can only structure processes to a certain point and you need service oriented architectures to get the benefit of the technology.

Doc -- we are hacking the shit out of your panel right now. the organic unstructured activity in the audience vs. structured panel. Narry: Maslow's hierarchy of collaboration.

John P -- ERP was largest waste of money undertaken by civilization in two centuries. Narry: formatted data, transaction backbone. Issue is getting ERP to work with heterogeneous data and people.

P.S. -- The Key Issue: people's time isnt valuable right now and the value proposition of collaborative software is saving time.  Also great to see Narry again.


5:52:10 PM    comment []

Mitch Kapor
Some kinds of centralization is very helpful. 
 
Chandler - open, multi-platform email, calendar & contacts
  • Groove serving large enterprises (he is on their board), Chandler can be more P2P and serve differrent markets
  • Distinction between clients and servers isnt always clear
  • Using Jabber to find others
Great products always focus on the pragmatics while embodying a ideal spirit.
 
Q&A
 
  • On open source...More successful projects need an internal structure, large companies can also contribute their programmer's time. 
  • Why not doing something new...Email is the productivity application, its not a small topic.  It is something new, but you have to start with what people understand...its an information management platform with a radically different idea behind it.  Being able to move from structured to unstructured views and change the structure on the fly.  Similar to the semantic web, having the software actually know something.  Distributed security built into it from the beginning.
  • Glen Flieshman: can you make do with slower links.  A: both high and low bandwidth needed.  They need a base level of bandwidth and the ability to burst (the most common requirement)
  • Q: Mirror worlds and scopeware.  Scopeware organizes a pool of information along a time-line. CS professor at Yale: key organizing metaphore was not time, but narrative. A: have timeline interface, its modular, and he is interested in narratives which are not linear in time
  • Q: Is this more than an email client?  A: see the mission statement.  Lesson of Lotus: if something is widely adopted you get enormous leverage.  Leading with the application piece while designing the platform at the start.   Could build full equivalent of finder/file manager. 
  • Dave Winer: how does this compare to Lotus in how you relate to your dev team?  A: Mitch focuses on front-end and user and depends upon people he respects for back end.  More open to new ideas than before, such as from Mitchell Baker for processes for community design.  Clearer in his role as a decision maker. Organizational design is so he can be there for years.
  • In release 1.0 its not a Blogging tool.  Beyond that its possible, open possibilities.  Even word processor and spreadsheet.
  • Cory: liability of email retention.  A: policy management features
  • Doc: who has picked upon the project  A: resonates with big players, foundation interest, team building  

5:43:56 PM    comment []

Panel: Beyond the Web
  • Jeremy Allaire
  • Mike Helfrich, Groove Networks
  • Karl Jacob, Cloudmark
  • Doc Searls, Linux World
Intro: web is at its core a centralized client-server application architecture
 
Karl: P2P Spam. 230k registered users since June.  Shift from stove pipe companies (Amazon) to consumer-defined (e.g. Classmates.com emerging from inside the network).
 
Mike: P2P decentralized Collaboration application.  Circumvents the inefficiency of centralized IT.  Clusters within the enterprise, rapid formation of teams and supporting applications  -- a need in business and in modern government.  Adaptive systems -- Social Software.  Rich Clients for use in perhpheral infrastructure enviroments.  Speed and self-healing. Rich person to person interactions vs. rich person to information.
 
Doc: Decentralization = N-x architeture.   Big companies didnt invent the net, technologists did. Trends start with technologists, not customers (or technocrats for that matter).  Self-fulfilling vision of a place: no one owns it, everyone can use it and anybody can improve it.  Google is a monopoly, but Technorati adds value.  WiFi...Arraycom uses smart antennas for cellular broadband.  Internet services we dont have yet but are going to be deployed: IM, identity services.  Create the infrastructures that others can build upon.
 
Panel discussion:
 
Mike: CIO of DoD recognizes customer determined interoperability (standardization) is key.  Great DoD (see post on FCS & Embedding Training) examples of Advanced Distributed Learning using rich clients and institutionalization of knowledge.
 
Karl: Emergent behavior and network adoption is quicker than you anticipate.  Real-time trust evaluation and feedback.
 
Jeremy: Web not good at Immersive media, multi-user experiences, sophisticated user action
 
Doc: Email is not a rich experience, but everone needs it.
 
Marc Canter: HTML is limiting coordinates, time (it is real), media mgmt.
 
KnowNow: open sourced a component of its architecture
 
Karl: eBay and Amazon's biggest cost is servers and network, push it to a P2P.  What do you open source from these models?  Ratings systems?
 
Mitch: Power of social networks. Military has social set of practices that makes it work just as well as the hierarchy. Makes the same point as my post on Social Software.  Community is leadership and guidance that brings people together. 
 
Kevin: the spam problem with open networks?  Karl: 99% of the people agree on what is spam, community is self-regulating.  Simple rules, complex results.  Trust the network.  Thinking in the small to define the rules. Large companies could set these kind of rules and then turn it loose. Identity good for centralization, authorization, ratings too.
 
Karl's points bringsup a big point to me -- elements of a service or relationships or architecture that contain risk should be unbundled and centralized.  Centralizing risk allows the pooling of risk.  Pooling is in contrast to unbundling risk under centralized control.  The analogy is MS's Passport (control) vs. Visa (pooling the risk of banks).
 
Doc: infrastructures: of the net itself (Vint Cerf, infrastructure is the protocols) vs. application overlays.     
 
Dan Farber: Amazon provides a personal infrastructure.  Balance between having a real business vs. creating open innovation is as big a question as De/centralization balance.
 
Dave Winer: Amazon & eBay opening identity, or a consortium
 
 
Standout issues:
+ Again, trust
+ Content production costs for individuals
+ Meta data capture costs
+ Identity
+ Directory
+ Security

5:43:20 PM    comment []

Rod Smith, IBM

Fascinating to me, but much of IBM's new commodity management model, wasn't understood enough to be explored by the audience.  So the focus was from web services to the consumer in the value chain.  The missing piece was data commodities to web services.

On Demand

  • Responsive in real-time
  • Variable cost structures
  • Focused on differentiating
  • Resilient, Global

Drivers for Next Gen Biz Apps: inter-enterprise, integration & QoS.  Coordinating decentralization

Requirements:

  • Integrated
  • Built on open standards - what's new is standard process is quicker
  • Virtualized
  • Autonomic

Question of QoS tiers for commoditization.  This is not an issue, IMHO -- there are over 150 grades of West Texas Intermediate Crude WTI -- the largest oil commodity contract.  I doubt anyone in the room gets commoditization, but they will.

Great questions in the summary slide:

  • What if integration costs went to zero?
  • What if IT disolves into the fabric of a company?
  • What happens when integration decisions happen at <web service> deployment time or connection time... or business contract time?

The real opportunity is accelerating the Innovation-Integration cycle. 

Floor questions:

  • Tom from UCB asks for examples of web services that delivers business value today.  WebBeacons took an internal app and ASPed it to eliminate 15 people who manually proceessed their trucking procurement 3 days to 4 hour turn around time, reduced cost by $1m.  e2open, UDDI and SOAP, now up to 600 companies integrated. 
  • Dave Winer asks about Patents again.  IBM has not patented what's in SOAP. 
  • Follow Marc's question on patents,  IBM asks startups they work with to adhere to open standards (which costs them considerably) -- reasonable answers.
  • Isen: IBM had the world by the short hairs, but is now relatively decentralized.  How do we help Microsoft change like IBM did?
    • language change
    • connected with customers to get their view of the issues

5:41:46 PM    comment []

Dan'l Lewin, Microsoft

This was ugly.  Perhaps for good reason, but the Ad Hoc got a little Ad Hominim.

3 phases of the web...

  • TCP/IP - Connectivity
  • HTML - Presentation
  • XML - Programmability

Dartmouth invented timesharing and viewed Amiga as a graphic network client in 81 to allow kids to play Star Trek. 

Clusters Define an Era -- enabling tech, spect exuberance, crash, strong build out to come (Juglar infrastructure adoption wave). What's revolutionary is how we swung from server centric (3270 in the 70s) to client-centric (File Sharing, 80s), to server (HTML 90s) -- and now XML era is both, what Dan calls the Empowerment Revolution.

Two key innovations: net & portable decices.  Drives new app model.   Blocks: xml web services, user experiences (clients + servers + services), and services that span system, geo and other boundries.

Oh goody, here come the questions:

  • Marc Canter: will my.Net services be available to smucks like us or only .net subscribers!!!?  A: Yes, kind of, if you are a developer with money for us.  Schema is not open.
  • Dave Winer: Patents? Why trust a convicted monopolist with your identity? A:___
  • Third party opportunities? A: Large enterprises, primarily.
  • Mitch Ratcliff: the startup question, A: leveraging component assets an opportunity, not devices, not schema.
  • Marc: Show leadership to not license the schema!  License the runtime.
  • Davd Isenberg: Licensed vs. unlicensed -- makes me realize how MS is tantamount to a spectrum license tax for web services.

Dan'l is a great and brave individual for coming here.  And this is getting fun.


5:38:20 PM    comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 Ross Mayfield.
Last update: 1/4/2003; 11:58:47 AM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.
December 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Nov   Jan