btw.net Weblog
In this age of digital, a critical design point is the architecture of systems (socio-economic, technological, political). If everything can become digital (can be represented as a number) then the relation of that thing to other things becomes very abstract. We begin to think in terms of classes and instances, and how they could interact with other classes. And we risk losing track of the fact that we're thinking abstractly about things that affect real people in this real world. This blog is about the architecture of systems. And how architecture affects the real world.

 




-

Digital










-

Emerging




Subscribe to "btw.net Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Tuesday, October 11, 2005



But he's helping create the language that we'll all cocreate and understand in a few years
What Is Web 2.0
Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
by Tim O'Reilly
09/30/2005


5:40:12 PM    comment []

From the Edge, an essay: THE REAL CRISIS IN EVOLUTION TEACHING [9.29.05]
By Scott D. Sampson

Darwinian evolution is one of the cornerstones of modern science, resoundingly accepted by the scientific community for almost one and half centuries. Yet, amazingly, considerably less than half of the United States population believes that the theory of evolution is supported by the evidence, and 42% of respondents in recent poll agreed that "living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time." What lies behind this profound disconnect between scientists and the general public? Currently, there is a strong tendency among school teachers and professional academics alike to blame this educational disaster on the religious right. This view has certain merit. For example, most recently, the Intelligent Design movement has been able to gain considerable ground through its "teach the controversy" campaign, appealing to Americans' sense of fairness. Yet placement of blame on right-wing fundamentalism is severely misplaced; it also misses the point.

Efforts to educate children and the general public about biological evolution have long suffered a severe crisis of relevancy independent of religious influences, and this crisis continues unabated. Even for those who accept its veracity in this country and others, evolution is generally (and mistakenly) envisioned as a process of the past, encompassed by abstract concepts that have little bearing on humans, let alone the future of Earth's diversity. This failure of education, while complicated by a number of factors, is due in large part to a lengthy history of fragmentation and compartmentalization within academia that has left us with a void between two fundamental ideas: ecology and evolution....

It would be simple to upstage his argument, to telegraph his punchline.
But he is complete and brief.
I urge you, I plead, that you read the short essay. It is important.


5:07:40 PM    comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Russ Savage.
Last update: 11/2/05; 5:45:37 AM.

October 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Jan   Nov