Presence
In the theatre, we talk about presence a lot. Some people use the word charisma, but I'm not as fond of that word. It suggests personality, which is not what I mean when I refer to presence in the theatre. A person of charisma may have presence, but what I'm talking about is the kind of presence an actor can bring to the stage whether they have a powerful off-stage personality or not.
What is presence?
My aesthetic wants one thing when I go to the theatre. I don't go to be moved, to be educated, or even inspired. All those things for me are by-products of the thing I really go to the theatre for. I go to see something happen.
Why is it that something seldom does?
What I mean by wanting something to happen is that acting is the art of doing. Not pretending to do, not making believe that you're doing, but doing. Actually acting, as in action, as in trying to impact the here-and-now body state of the other person on the stage. I'm not going to go on about this just now, but I want to throw it out there for those of you who love the theatre to think about.
Here's the question: when you are watching live theatre, how do you know when something's happening or not? I suggest (and this will sound no doubt somewhat elitist) that audiences today are not terribly discriminating, and often times cannot tell the difference when something is happening and something is only pretending to happen. There is nothing more thrilling in the theatre than action between characters. This is what is popularly referred to as electricity between actors. Why are those shattering moments, when something lifts off the boards and becomes infused with power that can barely be resisted?
Presence and action. If you are an actor, how do you go about getting there? And can you even know if you are there at all? Do you trust directors to tell you? Do you trust them to know?
Any takers on these questions?
7:49:49 AM