Updated: 11/1/07; 8:25:02 AM.
Patricia Thurston's Radio Weblog
        

Monday, October 29, 2007

Paul Krugman | Fearing Fear Itself. Paul Krugman, writing for The New York Times, says: "In America's darkest hour, Franklin Delano Roosevelt urged the nation not to succumb to 'nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror.' But that was then. Today, many of the men who hope to be the next president - including all of the candidates with a significant chance of receiving the Republican nomination - have made unreasoning, unjustified terror the centerpiece of their campaigns." [t r u t h o u t]
12:29:08 PM    comment []

'Edwards plans big for presidency,' promising "a New Deal-like suite of programs to fight poverty and stem growing wealth disparity," and asking Americans for sacrifices, including paying higher taxes. He also promises a '2-year ban on new drug ads.' [Cursor.org]
12:28:16 PM    comment []

In an article reporting on how the "one time Bush administration favorite Ahmad Chalabi ... has re-emerged as a central figure in the latest U.S. strategy for Iraq," McClatchy quotes Col. Boylan as saying that he "is an important part of the process ... He has a lot of energy." [Cursor.org]
12:25:38 PM    comment []

With Iraq apparently heading "towards a warlord state," Marc Lynch suggests that we "stop paying attention to body counts and start instead focus on the long-term political realities" of the country, [Cursor.org]
12:17:16 PM    comment []

In Basra, now patrolled by death squads and rife with the "language of the apocalypse," British troops strike a deal to "stay out in return for assurances that they will not be attacked," while U.S. troops return from Baghdad "tired, bitter and skeptical," and State Department officials get their marching orders. [Cursor.org]
12:16:30 PM    comment []

Lawyer Group Wants Executions FrozenA three-year study finds unfairness and glitches, the American Bar Assn. says in calling for a national moratorium.. CHICAGO - The American Bar Assn., concluding a three-year study of capital punishment systems, found so many inequities and shortfalls that it is calling for a national freeze on executions. In a report to be released today, the organization, which has more than 400,000 members, said that death penalty systems in Indiana, Georgia, Ohio, Alabama and [...] [CommonDreams.org » Headlines07]
12:10:45 PM    comment []

Angela Bonavoglia: Catholic Bishops Agree -- Reluctantly, Reluctantly! -- to Treat Rape Victims.

To the great dismay of Catholic bishops, Connecticut's lawmakers have mandated that all of the state's hospital emergency rooms, including Catholic-run hospitals, must make emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention available to every rape victim who comes through their doors.

The Connecticut Catholic bishops are not happy. They have agreed, according to the current issue of the National Catholic Register, to "reluctant compliance."

Reluctant? Every time this issue comes up -- an issue that, astonishingly, remains unresolved in many parts of the country -- we have to ask: How can these guys live with themselves? Their goal is to deprive a woman who has been raped -- forcibly penetrated by a man who gets off on violence and violation -- of the means to prevent a pregnancy, with the express aim of forcing her to carry the rapist's progeny to term.

And that is exactly what the Catholic churchmen have been doing. The Vatican publicly and vociferously denounced the UN's plan some years ago to send the "morning after" pill to women raped in the wars in Kosovo and Bosnia. Catholic bishops have been lobbying all over the country against these laws, claiming that EC is an abortifacient because it can impede implantation of a fertilized egg (as opposed to preventing fertilization).

Many Catholic hospitals put every raped woman who appears in their ERs through another ordeal, requiring her to take and wait for the results of a urine test to see if she's ovulating. If she isn't ovulating and EC is therefore useless to her, she can have it. If she is ovulating -- and is therefore in grave danger of becoming pregnant from the rape -- they refuse to give her EC.

Because this new law mandates the provision of EC, the urine test is down the toilet.

So the bishops have shifted position. There are several reasons for this. First, they make a ton of money in their hospitals. To refuse to comply, they'd have to close those institutions down, and you won't see them doing that.

Second, while they like you to think their theology is set in holy stone, it's actually quite fungible, when it's to their advantage. Despite their past claims that EC is immoral, evil, and all of the denunciations they like to hurl at things female (birth control, sterilization, in vitro fertilization, abortion), and despite a Vatican declaration that EC, whether interfering with implantation or fertilization, "is really nothing other than a chemically induced abortion," they're singing a different tune.

Their new position holds that since you can't know when EC is interfering with implantation, and since that's probably not often the case, and since we're not talking about a high number of women who get pregnant from rape (several thousand women in the U.S., who cares?), then dispensing EC without the ovulation test is not "intrinsically evil."

"In permitting Catholic hospitals to comply with this law, neither our teaching nor our principles have changed," lied Bridgeport, CT Bishop William Lori, chair of the U.S. Bishops Committee of Doctrine (and, less illustriously, as I point out in Good Catholic Girls, a bishop who has kept an accused priest sex molester in ministry after including his victim in a $21 million settlement). "We have altered the prudential judgment we previously made."

The twisting of their theological "truths" to serve their own ends reveals the capricious nature of the decision-making process of this all-powerful, all-male hierarchy. Unfortunately, there is no indication that they are willing to allow the woman who has been raped or any other pregnant woman to make her own "prudential judgment."

Interestingly, Dan O'Brien, VP of ethics of St. Louis-based Ascension Health, which has 65 acute care hospitals in Bridgeport, expressed great alarm that lawmakers would dare to make laws governing medical institutions. He obviously forgot that regulation of medical care and medical providers is one of the most important jobs of policymakers and lawmakers in their efforts to protect public health.

Connecticut's new law goes back to basics. It is a triumph of state over church. It insures that women who have been raped get the care they need when they enter a hospital, any hospital, if it serves the general public, employs the general public, and lives off public monies, as do Catholic institutions. America's Catholic hospitals are not little islands of religiosity, employing and serving only devout Catholics with private monies. They are full-fledged institutions that have established themselves firmly in the secular health care world.

Their responsibilities are to all of us, not just the men in the mitres.

[The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com]
12:06:15 PM    comment []

Karzai To Bush: [OE]Roll Back[base '] The Use Of Airstrikes In Afghanistan.

On 60 Minutes last night, Afghan President Hamid Karzai described his efforts to get President Bush to [base "]rethink[sigma]the use of air force[per thou] in Afghanistan, which has killed more than 270 civilians in 17 air strikes in 2007 alone. Karzai says he delivered that message [base "]privately[per thou] to President Bush in August using [base "]clear words[base "]:

HAMID KARZAI, AFGHAN PRESIDENT: The Afghan people understand that mistakes are made. But five years on, six years on, definitely, very clearly, they cannot comprehend as to why there is still a need for air power.

PELLEY: You are asking the American government to roll back the air strikes. Do I understand you?

KARZAI: Absolutely. Oh, yes, in clear words.

PELLEY (voice-over): Karzai told us he delivered those words privately to President Bush in August.

Watch it:

Screenshot

The increased use of air strikes is not limited to the war in Afghanistan. U.S. commanders in Iraq are trumpeting the fact that troop casualties have dramatically declined this past month, falling to one of the lowest levels in 2007. But as USA Today reported last week, [base "]the U.S. military has increased air strikes in Iraq four-fold this year.[per thou] [base "]The shift means greater safety for our ground troops,[per thou] notes Slate[base ']s Fred Kaplan, but [base "]it also generates more local hostility.[per thou]

Such increases in [base "]local hostility[per thou] undermine the counterinsurgency strategy laid out in the U.S. Army[base ']s field manual, by creating [base "]collateral damage that turns people against the host-nation government and provides insurgents with a major propaganda victory.[per thou]

[Think Progress]
12:02:03 PM    comment []

© Copyright 2007 Patricia Thurston.
 
October 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Sep   Nov


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Patricia Thurston's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.