MARK BRADY: Topic for Debate. Mr Kim told ABC News Pyongyang had "enough nuclear bombs to defend against a US attack." For the full story go here.
If true, is this a good or bad thing? And would the world now be a better or worse place if Iraq had had enough nuclear bombs to defend against a US attack in March 2003? [Liberty & Power: Group Blog]
I don't think it really makes that much difference in North Korea's case. If Iraq had nuclear weapons, the Feds wouldn't have attacked them, but the Feds can't really attack North Korea regardless--South Korea and Japan wouldn't go along with it.
11:20:50 PM 
|
