Updated: 6/25/09; 10:19:11 PM.
'if' ...
What you alter in the remembering has yet a reality, known or not. - Cormac McCarthy


Wednesday, July 6, 2005
> radical pedagogy

". . . terms of boundary crossing, this means that civil discourse has not occurred if boundaries that define spaces of sound and spaces of silence have not been recognized and honored. Both sound and silence are crucial if the city is not simply to degenerate into a place of violence.
Finally, and most emphatically, city speech does not avoid argument. In fact, the rhythm of crossing, recognizing, and honoring boundaries is descriptive of the discipline of argument. (Remember the formulation at the beginning of this essay: liberal arts are concerned with discovery, appreciation, orientation, and application[~]redefined here in terms of crossing, recognizing, and honoring boundaries.) Where there is no argument, there is no civil discourse, and there is no city. Such a place is likely to be defined in one of three ways: either it is surrounded by an essentially impermeable boundary that excludes difference; or it is marked by violent struggle for control of turf; or (most likely) it is a mixture of both, with enforced homogeneity near the center of power and violent struggle for control of turf on the fringes."
(Radical Pedagogy (2000)|A Laboratory for Civil Discourse Steven Schroeder )

(via the daily read wood s lot)

:: note :: . . . speak but always be prepared . . . a speech act = resistance . . .

© Copyright 2009 if.
Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.    Click to see the XML version of this web page.   Subscribe to my feed    Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


July 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Jun   Aug

Site search Web search

powered by FreeFind


Recent Posts


How this works

Technorati Profile

Clicky Web Analytics