Like dreams, statistics are a form of wish fulfillment . - Jean Baudrillard
Folks, some media and telecoms numbers out this week and last:
- Russ [| OfcomWatch |]* The Office of the Telecoms Adjudicator reports that there are now 163000 unbundled local loops, with about 5000 line orders per week. The UK is on target to hit one million unbundled loops in 2006. * Ofcom reports 65.9% of UK households have digital television (of some type). Q3 saw about a million Freeview set-top box sales. So, the UK is speeding toward that bright, fully digital future in which broadband is at every doorstep and digital multichannel television streams right into every home. Look for educational attainment, worker productivity and overall social harmony increases in the near future. Or something like that... But seriously, if Freeview and unbundled loops are the UK government's preferred industrial policies we will surely see steady progress in these numbers quarter on quarter. That's inevitable, right? Gosplan mandated more steel production - they got it. But unbundled loops have their problems. They require constant regulatory oversight and might discourage true infrastructure competition. Freeview has also been called a transitional technology and has about the same usefulness as analogue cable (one-way, limited capacity). And the Freeview programming mostly stinks. So, the big question is not whether these platforms are being rolled out in an efficient, fair and speedy fashion. The big question is whether they will produce results (or don't impede other results) that work for UK citizens and consumers. They might; I'm not saying they won't... but I just don't see the need to cheer the day we cross the 500,000th unbundled loop or the day the seven millionth Freeview box is sold... 2:34:05 AM ![]() |
Revision of Television Without Frontiers Directive
As I mentioned in
an earlier posting
would be the case, proposals for a substantial review of the 1989 European Union Television Without Frontiers Directive were considered today by the College of Commissioners. The
draft proposals
have been published together with a
media release
from Commissioner Viviane Reding.
- Roger Darlington [| OfcomWatch |]The Commission believes that, in line with the principle of better regulation, the proposal will reduce the regulatory burden on Europe’s providers of television and television-like services and give more flexibility for financing audiovisual content by new forms of advertising. The proposal is intended to create a level playing field for all companies that offer television-like services, irrespective of the technology used to deliver them (e.g. broadcast, high-speed broadband, third generation mobiles). The Commission therefore proposes replacing disparate national rules on protection of minors, against incitement to racial hatred and against surreptitious advertising with a basic, EU-wide minimum standard of protection for audiovisual on demand services. The modernised Television Without Frontiers Directive would govern television and television-like services. To open up the present EU rules to technological developments, the proposal distinguishes between "linear" services (e.g. scheduled broadcasting via traditional television, the Internet, or mobile phones, which "pushes" content to viewers), and "non-linear" ones, such as on-demand films or news, which the viewer "pulls" from a network. Today’s television broadcasting rules would apply to linear services in a modernised, more flexible form, whereas non-linear ones would be subject only to a basic set of minimum principles, e.g. to protect minors, prevent incitement to racial hatred and outlaw surreptitious advertising. The proposed modernisation of the Television Without Frontiers Directive does not affect private correspondence, electronic versions of newspapers or magazines, web sites not primarily intended to provide audiovisual media content, mere audio transmissions or radio. 2:14:53 AM ![]() |
The New Draft Directive on Audiovisual Media Services: Some Problems...
The European Commission’s Christmas present to the media and communications sector is a
proposal for a new Directive
on the regulation of audiovisual media services. Along with it comes an
Impact Assessment Document
in an attempt to balance risks and benefits of the legislative initiative. The scope of the Directive has been considerably extended to cover not just broadcasting or broadcasters but “audiovisual media services” and “media service providers”. In theory, rules are now more flexible and less burdensome. The principle of the country of origin is maintained, product placement is allowed (with some limits), advertising restrictions are relaxed, a right of access to short news reports of events of high interest to the public is introduced, and co-regulation is encouraged. All fine and well, or so it seems.
I have been reading the Draft this morning and here are some first thoughts and impressions (more to come). * The first thing that puzzles me has to do with the highly controversial distinction between linear and non-linear services. This distinction is based on choice, control and impact (Recital 28). The proposed Directive makes plenty of references to such distinction, but only in the Recitals. In the text of the proposal, however, the term “non-linear services” is only used once, and this is to define them in Article 1. After that, the distinction seems to be forgotten and only “audiovisual media services” is used. This is fine for those of us who were against the distinction in the first place, but it is confusing. Recital 28, for example, states that the Directive imposes lighter regulation on non-linear services, which only have to comply with the basic rules provided for in Articles 3c to 3h (these deal with protection of minors, incitement to hate, promotion of European works, commercial communications and sponsorship). Why is this not specified in the actual text? Recitals do have legal value, mainly for the purposes of interpretation, but further clarification regarding the application of a lighter regime for non-linear services is still needed. * All media service providers, including non-linear ones, need to promote, where practicable and by appropriate means the production of and access to European works (Article 3f). The reason why this requirement applies to non-linear services is given by Recital 35: “ non-linear audiovisual media services have the potential to partially replace linear services ”. Now, this is weak and unconvincing. Regulation based on “potential to partially” do things is, put simply, bad regulation. Another enduring (but not new) problem in this respect is that of what does “where practicable” mean. * For the first time the Draft Directive refers to regulatory authorities. Article 23b reads: 1. Member States shall guarantee the independence of national regulatory authorities and ensure that they exercise their powers impartially and transparently. 2. National regulatory authorities shall provide each other and the Commission with the information necessary for the application of the provisions of this Directive. The call for independence and transparency of national regulators should be welcome, as with few exceptions, national broadcasting authorities in the Europe of 25 cannot brag much about their independence (assuming such ideal is indeed possible, of which I am skeptical). The requirement in paragraph 2 to exchange information among NRAs and the Commission might be less welcome, though, as it will substantially increase the workload of national regulators. It is also unclear whether this will be for the better, how this information shall be exchanged and with what purposes. Would it be advisable to create an equivalent to the European Regulators’ Group for audiovisual media? Harmonisation and consistency across the internal market is certainly one objective but what should be the role of the Commission in this regard? The regulation of audiovisual media remains, primarily, a national matter. * Finally, rules on jurisdiction (possibly one of the most difficult issues in an on-line world) remain vague and uncertain. For example, the Draft Directive does not apply to audiovisual media services intended exclusively for reception in third countries and which are not received with standard consumer equipment directly or indirectly by the public in one or more Member States. What does “standard consumer equipment” mean? Recital 21 leaves the definition in the hands of “competent national authorities”. Clearly the TV set and the PC are pretty standard, but is that so also with mobile telephony platforms? What about Ipods, PDAs or many other platforms (existing or to come) that can be used by consumers to access content? On which basis will national authorities decide and is there a risk of fragmentation here?. * There are a some typos too…but let’s not be too picky. So, there are plenty of questions on the table and more to come. OW has been following this debate closely and we will continue to do so as the Draft makes its way through the Council and the Parliament, so stay tuned!. 2:14:29 AM ![]() |
Television Without Frontiers... I agree with Monica's post (below) concerning the proposed TV Without Frontiers revision, particularly her concerns with respect to the jurisdiction question. Really, the EC's proposals are over-regulatory and short-sighted in nearly every respect. I was tempted to do a very long post on this issue, but decided to simply put forth a few claims about the EC's proposal (or rebuttals of EC claims - Russ [| OfcomWatch |]2:13:56 AM ![]() |
Vodafone to Buy Turkish Phone Company. Vodafone made an expensive bet that it can fix the Turkish mobile operator Telsim. By HEATHER TIMMONS. [NYT > Technology] 2:09:51 AM ![]() |
Digital Domain: Is Mark Cuban Missing the Big Picture?. Mark Cuban's rationale for making hugely expensive investments in Landmark Theaters, an art-house chain, seems dangerously ungrounded in reality. By RANDALL STROSS. [NYT > Technology] 2:07:57 AM ![]() |
Bendy Microprocessor on Plastic.
Firm makes bent CPU [The Inquirer] [Gizmodo]2:04:27 AM ![]() |
Nano TV on Swisscom Mobile. ![]() Tag: | Posted in: Related 3G News Applications Opinion Our 3G Support Service - [Daily 3G News] 2:03:36 AM ![]() |
i-mode in Korea?. Reuters.com, 13 December 2005NTT DoCoMo Inc. is in final talks to buy a 10 percent stake in South Korea's KTF Co. Ltd. for as much as $500 million as Japan's top mobile carrier seeks new avenues of growth, industry sources said on Tuesday. The deal between DoCoMo and South Korea's second-ranked mobile operator could be announced as early as this week, the sources told Reuters.... [i-mode Business Strategy] 2:02:51 AM ![]() |
DoCoMo leans toward flexible mobile displays. Plastic Logic of the UK, a developer of plastic electronics, is to jointly develop flexible active-matrix displays for mobile devices with DoCoMo. A thin, flexible, and ultra-light user interface may ultimately change handset design. [i-mode Business Strategy] 2:01:17 AM ![]() |
Delhi-based Cellnext Solutions Upbeat About VAS Business; Plans Interactive TV Application, Location-based Services. ![]() The company is ready to launch its interactive TV application, through, which users can play a game on their TV through SMS. The service would first be launched on SMS and then would also be available on IVR. The company is launching it in Delhi first and is tying up with all the cable operators in the city for providing the game on the TV. The company would start testing this service shortly.Cellnext, which has 70 employees currently and growin by 30-40 percent, specialises in wireless technologies like SMS, STK, DP, MMS, GPRS, IVR, J2ME, etc. in GSM and CDMA. [ContentSutra] 1:41:38 AM ![]() |
Value Added Services Revenues To Account For 20 Per Cent of Sales Of Service Providers. The Economic Times (Via Agencyfaqs.com): India's leading business paper, The Economic Times, today front-paged a story on value added services saying that it's in for an exponential growth. These are the key points: There are daily downloads of about 1 million paid ringtones and about 100 million SMSs, and this may grow even further in coming months, say operators. VAS services presently contribute about 10 per cent of the total telecom revenue.Do you agree with these numbers? [ContentSutra] 1:19:55 AM ![]() |
Telecom Sector Update. Check out the report “Telecom Sector Update - November 2005″ on India Infoline for a good roundup of the state of industry and some stats, graphs and news. [Mobile Pundit]1:18:27 AM ![]() |
Aircel in talks with Malaysian telcos. ET speculates that Aircel is in discussions with Malaysian telcos, Maxis Communications and Telekom Malaysia with the intention of inducting a strategic partner. The size of the transaction is expected to exceed $700 million. Of the two telcos, Maxis is believed to be closer to clinching the deal.
Maxis is owned by Malaysian tycoon Ananda Krishnan while Telekom Malysia is a listed entity which is controlled by the Malaysian government.
Aircel sources did not elaborate on those issues but said they were waiting for the government to announce its 3G policy in January next year, before taking a decision on any deal.
The deal includes Aircel[base ']Äôs Tamil Nadu circle and 10 new circles in North and Eastern India for which the company has received licenses. Of these, Aircel has started its GSM operations in Assam, North East, Orissa, West Bengal and the J&K telecom circle. It is in the process of rolling out its operations in Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, MP, UP(East) and UP(West). It has a subscriber base of 22 lakh across all the circles. [Mobile Pundit]1:17:12 AM ![]() |
Mobisodes mela. Indian Express story on how Indian TV channels are scrambling to make available Mobisodes of their programs. After the success of The Great Indian Laughter Challenge, Star One launched a series of one-minute gags on mobile. MTV has taken on the task of releasing fresh mobisodes every day, all based on their new youth-centric serial, Pyaar Vyaar and All That. Sony plans to release mobisodes based on Indian Idol, Ek Ladki Anjaani Si and Deal Ya No Deal. Zee is currently working on assembling humorous moments from the show Hum Paanch into mobisodes. They[base ']Äôre also considering relaunching some vintage projects like Banegi Apni Baat on mobile. Mona Singh may become the first TV actor to star in a mobile series featuring her as the protagonist.
For kiddie specialist Hungama TV, it will be a natural progression from Hungaming, a cellular gaming zone that it just launched.
Like ringtones and games, Mobisodes are of download-and-consume type. But the larger download size puts extra load on the operator’s 2G GPRS network. If the user experience in downloading a mobisode is sub-standard it would be affect their takeoff. [Mobile Pundit]1:14:52 AM ![]() |
i-Mode as inspiration for India. Sumedh Mungee gets it, when he sees stark similarities between Japan and India in their market conditions, which were essential to i-Mode’s success. From Webcams and i-Mode at Wap Review:
There is one dissimilarity though. Phone calls and SMS costs are the cheapest in India and data is expensive. So would i-Mode meet success in India, unlike its other not so successful attempts outside Japan. [Mobile Pundit]1:13:06 AM ![]() |
Free for all Starting an internet business may be easier than ever, what with cheap computers, free software and bandwidth out the wazoo, but that just means it'll he harder than ever to make money. The latest evidence: Om Malik reports that VOIP provider SIPphone will announce 1-cent-per-minute PC-to-phone calls tomorrow, matching Yahoo's promotional rate and undercutting eBay's Skype. Also tomorrow, Malik notes, Microsoft will enter the market. "This is turning into a brutal price war," he says.
Low barriers to entry, microscopic marginal transaction costs, a commodity service and a bunch of competitors fearful that a rival may gain market share. Do I hear a half cent a minute? - nick (nick@roughtype.com) [Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog]1:02:30 AM ![]() |
Monster mash The free-for-all continues. Amazon.com has opened up its Alexa search engine to all comers. Just as Amazon's affiliates can tap into the company's merchandise catalog to build their own stores, so entrepreneurs and tinkerers can now tap into Alexa's vast catalog of web content to build their own applications or sites. And, for modest fees, they can even use Amazon's computing platform as their own computing infrastructure. Just plug into the utility socket.
John Battelle, who broke the news, sees this as a potential "game-changer" in the search world. Om Malik sees it as a commoditize-thy-enemy's-product tactic: "Amazon.com is trying to inflict death by a thousand cuts to rivals including the GYM Gang" - ie, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft. Phil Wainewright calls it - gulp - "a seminal moment in the dawn of Web 3.0."
Whether Amazon's looking to make money or make it harder for rivals to make money, the move does look like something of a watershed. What's interesting is that it separates, or unbundles, the "engine" that, in a real sense, powers the web from the applications of that engine. And it turns the engine into a cheap commodity. It's not hard to think of what happened when another engine - the steam engine - became a commodity a couple hundred years ago. An incredible number of applications of steam power were rapidly invented. Now, the search engine is far from the steam engine, but the example shows what can happen when you commoditize a basic piece of commercial infrastructure, giving a lot of people and companies access to it. The big question is: Are there a whole bunch of incredibly valuable search applications to be invented, or will this just set off an explosion of cute mashups? We'll see.
One other thing's worth noting: This promises to add yet a few new wrinkles to the confusion surrounding copyright and intellectual property on the internet. - nick (nick@roughtype.com) [Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog]12:57:47 AM ![]() |
The 5% solution Faced with the prospect of losing a sizable chunk of its ad business to Microsoft, Google has, apparently, made AOL a counteroffer it can't refuse. According to media reports, Google will give Time-Warner, AOL's beleaguered owner, a cool billion in return for a 5 percent stake in AOL. It will also give AOL the privilege of selling ads that will run on Google's search network, which up to now has been restricted to ads sold by Google. Finally, in a concession that apparently clinched the deal, Google will give AOL ad content special treatment, according to the New York Times:
So much for the purity of the algorithm.
In isolation, the deal seems to be good news for Google - it's going to make it harder for Microsoft to build up its own ad service and challenge Google's nascent monopoly. But the deal may not be an isolated event. The question is: How many more deals will Google need to cut with advertisers and publishers in the future? Is this deal a sign that Google is consolidating its power or losing it?
UPDATE: A Washington Post piece has more details on the deal, including how Google will subsidize AOL ads on its network through a "substantial fixed-dollar budget." - nick (nick@roughtype.com) [Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog]12:56:45 AM ![]() |
Everything's negotiable The New York Times has updated its story on the deal between Google and Time Warner, providing further details about the terms. It reveals just how desperate Google was to maintain the AOL partnership:
Ouch. - nick (nick@roughtype.com) [Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog]12:49:18 AM ![]() |
Nokia: 3 Billion Mobiles By 2008. This is pretty cool. Nokia has updated their predictions and is now saying that there will be three billion mobile phone subs by 2008, two years ahead of everyone’s previous estimates of 3 billion by 2010. This makes perfect sense as I’ve noticed over the past couple of years that the estimates for mobile phone sales at the beginning of the year are usualy 25-30% lower than the actual numbers by the end of the year. Look at the predictions for 2004 and 2005, there were mid-year correctons by all the analysis firms in both years.
So what does this mean to me? Well, since I’m thinking about services for the industrialized, mostly Western countries which are already reaching mobile saturation, and moving on to advanced data services, probably not a lot. But I think as an indicator of global trends, it means we’re just at the beginning of some really cool opportunities. If you think of a timeline where people first get a phone, then move along the technology cycle where the handsets get more powerful, networks get faster and rates get cheaper, there’s going to be a lot of people connected really soon. Also, as time goes on there’s chances for countries to leapfrog older cellular technology and arrive at 3G sooner because of the economies of scale from manufacturers. But even with plain-old SMS technologies, there’s a lot of interesting SmartMobs-like changes coming to many parts of the world. Cool stuff. Now I have to go back and change a bunch of slides… ;-) -Russ [Russell Beattie Notebook]12:47:32 AM ![]() |
Google To Finally Make Its Big Mobile Move?. Rumors are trickling through the blogosphere that Google is going to buy Opera. It's been rumored for some time that Google was working on its own Web browser, thought to be based on open-source software like Mozilla, reflecting its apparent... [MobHappy] 12:36:01 AM ![]() |
Smart Marketers Go Black. eMarketer points to some work by Solutions Research Group (SRG) suggesting that in the US, Black and to a lesser extent, Hispanic mobile users are far more likely to use advanced (ie non voice) features of their phones. 37%... [MobHappy] 12:10:52 AM ![]() |