Updated: 7/3/02; 9:27:02 AM.
there is no spoon
there's a difference between knowing the path, and walking the path
        

Friday, June 28, 2002


Pledge of Allegiance

As politicians and pundits continue to rage about the fact that anyone would dare question the Pledge of Allegiance, more, um, reasonable people are asking questions about the pledge. NPR's "All Things Considered" (the afternoon/evening news program) ran a good story on the history of the pledge yesterday. And today Craig's Booknotes points to another history of the pledge. According to Cheryl Taylor:

The original pledge was: "I pledge allegiance to my flag and to the Republic for which it stands: one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

The pledge was changed in 1924 (replacing "my flag" with "the flag of the United States of America") and again in 1954, when the "under God" was added. Both the early 1920s and the early 1950s were times when certain American traditions (including the American tradition of thinking ourselves more secure in the world than any other people) were under threat from a changing world. We seem to be in a similar period today, so perhaps we should just dispense with this whole nonsense of this old pledge and go all the way. "I pledge blind and happy obedience to anything multi-national corporate interests want to do to me, to anyone else on the planet, or to the planet itself." Ok, it needs work, but you get the idea.

p.s.: I just noticed, Craig's Booknotes also points to a few more salient facts about the pledge. I betcha didn't know it was written by a socialist, didya? And waddayaknow! The pledge's author, Francis Bellamy, was the first cousin of Edward Bellamy who wrote Looking Backward, an important but rather overlooked American utopian novel.  10:16:08 AM      comment   

categories: books, politics

The Cost of Economic Power

Today's NY Times reports that:

From South Korea to Indonesia, China is rapidly strengthening its economic presence across Asia, gobbling up foreign investment and chipping away at the United States' position as the region's economic engine.

Meanwhile, a quick Google search shows one of the big reasons China is becoming such a strong economic power -- it doesn't protect the environment or the workers who drive the economy. You don't want to be a miner in China, for example. You don't want to have to commute to work in a major city either, because you'll probably find it difficult to breathe.

If you have ever wondered what those "anti-globalization" protesters are all excited about it, China provides one answer. A lot of the money funding the industries that are killing or injuring workers and polluting the environment in China is global -- it comes from U.S. and multi-national corporations who like to invest in China (and other "developing" nations) because the cost of doing business is so low. Of course, the cost of doing business is so low because corporations don't have to pay for things like worker safety or environmental protections. So next time you hear someone tell you "free markets" and "globalization" are good for the future of the world and the world's poorest people, think again.

Oh, and have a great Friday! :-|  9:51:16 AM      comment   

categories: politics

 
June 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
May   Jul


Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Subscribe to "there is no spoon" in Radio UserLand.



© Copyright 2002 mowabb.
Last update: 7/3/02; 9:27:02 AM.