Talking with Bryan of JCD a few weeks back, a thought occurred to me that I've not been entirely able to resolve. Maybe some of you would like to chew on it, a bit of armchair existentialism and ethics:
Was it wrong for Alexander to be "the Great"?
[update and clarification]
My question seems a little vague, perhaps. What I'm trying to get at with the question -- the question behind my question -- is:
Why is imperialism wrong?
As one who spends much of my time in active listening to parties with the tendency to talk past one another, I hear the assertion is oft made "Imperialism is wrong" as a point of assumed dogma. I am honestly curious as to the *thinking* and *reasoning* behind the position.
Let it be clearly said and understood, kind reader, I'm not meaning to suggest or assert the antithesis (Imperialism is right).
I think that people who oppose the war on grounds that this is "American imperialism" might be well served to better articulate a clear definition of imperialism, as well as that path by which one arrives at the reasoned conclusion that imperialism is wrong.