In honor of the anniversary of Texas Independence Day (Thanks, K!), I present lyrics from Michael Ballew, a singer-songwriter from Austin, Texas:
Have a way of making time For yawning and a dreaming 'Bout an old flame of mine I can almost see her In the hill country dew All lit up like diamonds When the sun comes shining through (Chorus 1) All the folks out here don't understand (Chorus 2) (Bridge) Aw, let's go down to Texas. I first heard this song on the patio of Silvercreek in Fredericksburg, Texas (with some fabulous company) and fell in love with it right then. I do love Texas and I don't think I'd live anywhere else. This song expresses some of the things about Texas I love. 9:45:33 PM ![]() |
Even in the outrageous world of sports, not much really ever shocks me. But if this report from ESPN is true (and I have no doubt that it is, Pasquarelli is the hardest working man in football), I would have to say that I'm completely shocked. Apparently, Clinton Portis, a second year running back from Denver, will be traded to the Washington Redskins for Champ Bailey, a fifth year, Pro Bowl cornerback, and a second round pick. In the trade, Portis will become the highest paid running back in league history, earning $50.5 million over the next eight years, an average of $6.31 million a year. How is this possible you ask, dear reader? I ask myself the same damn question. But first, some useful data on the players involved. As noted above, Portis will be a third year back. He was slated to make. . .wait, you should be seated for this, so sit down. . .ok he was slated to make $380K this year and $455K next. So assuming this trade is consummated, he will have just gotten an almost $6 million dollar raise next year. But that's not the shocker. The shocker is that the Redskins were under no pressure to do a deal because Portis had already said, in a rare, wonderful moment of team spirit, that he would not hold out in camp if his contract wasn't renegotiated. Plus, because he was currently under contract, Washington had no obligation to renegotiate his contract. It would have been perfectly acceptable to let him play a year, evaluate his ability, and then renegotiate the contract. Instead, the Redskins make him the highest paid running back in league history? Ay carumba. So how can this make financial sense? I have no idea. You have a second year back who ranked third in the league last year, behind TCU product LaDainian Tomlinson and just barely ahead of Fred Taylor, two backs playing on terrible teams. You have a second year back who played in Denver, a team notorious for churning out backs (Mike Anderson and Olandis Gary come to mind) that weren't nearly as good as their stats given the fact they ran behind an amazing line. And this is the guy that Daniel Snyder is making the highest paid running back in NFL history? The thought boggles my mind. Dan Snyder, owner of the Redskins, cannot be accused of making smart football decisions. Granted, he did manage to hire Joe Gibbs back this offseason after his experiment with Steve "I can't believe I can't play golf on Saturday" Spurrier but other than that, he's done nothing for the team since buying it. He's overspent on washed up veterans, he's meddled unnecessarily in team affairs, and he's generally made a nuisance of himself. But this deal tops them all. He's managed to trade away a pretty damn good cornerback (Pro Bowl, remember?!?) and a draft pick for a second year player with no real track record. It seems to me that the clear advantage goes to Denver in this deal. The real winner in all this though is Portis. Of course, he just became an instant millionaire but avoiding injury, he would have done that anyway. Whether he continues to be successful remains to be seen. But what I find to be his most redeeming quality is his genuineness during the proceedings, committing to camp regardless of the outcome. This is something so rare to see in professional sports today and somewhere deep, it warms my heart. I hope that he's successful in Washington. I just don't expect him to be. |
Calpundit extensively quotes an NBC piece reporting that the Bush has had several chances to take out Abu Musab Zarqawi and has passed after quite a bit of serious argument in the National Security Council. He also mentions the fact that Clinton had the chance to take out Osama, dismissing it as urban legend. A couple of things that stand out about this issue. One, it's hardly urban legend that Clinton could have taken out Osama if he would have pushed the Pentagon brass a little harder. This Weekly Standard article, which I consider required reading for understanding why terrorism has come to the shores of America, outlines the failings, not only of Clinton but of the Pentagon brass in general. And two, it's predominantly the left who claim that terrorism is a matter of law enforcement and that terrorists should be brought to justice. However, this doesn't square with criticism of the Bush administration when they cho0se not to attack Zarqawi. Maybe they were just waiting to capture him so that he could be tried fairly in the United States with a great defense team. My own views on this are that both Clinton and Bush have failed in killing known terrorists when they could. I don't believe terrorists should be brought to justice, I think justice should be brought to them. If we had the chance to kill Zarqawi and passed, the blood of 145 innocents in Iraq may be on Bush's hands today. But he's not the only one who had the chance and passed so there's plenty of blame to pass around, Clinton included. Eventually, our good nature and civility has to come to an end in a justifiable Jacksonian wrath. |
This sucks, Edwards is quitting after a Kerry sweep on Super Tuesday. I've argued that America is better off with two solid candidates I thought Edwards was by far the most solid of the two potential Democratic nominees. I expect to see Bush re-elected by a decent margin in November, assuming he doesn't trip between now and then. If we continue to be blessed with zero terrorist attacks on American soil, if the economy continues to chug along, and if the situation in Iraq continues to improve (and I don't think those are very big if's), Bush shouldn't have any trouble handling Kerry. I'd put initial odds at 5 to 4 with Bush as the favorite. 8:04:44 PM ![]() |
An interesting article on Kerry's war record. 6:46:50 PM ![]() |
Problems with Kerry 6:53:35 AM ![]() |
Democratic parody 6:42:33 AM ![]() |