b.cognoscoA quest to examine, inquire, and learn. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recently
Blog Channels Coming Soon!
Theme and CSS
IT Support
Hosting and comments
|
Monday, July 01, 2002Berman Proposal A Publicity Stuntcomment []
For the record, I support copyright protection. What I do not support is prior restraint, treating customers like criminals, or using the acts of a few to mandate wholesale monitoring and control structures for the many. No rational person would ever suggest legalizing unregulated vigilantism on the part of businesses. There are better ways to solve this problem. We've spent 200 years developing the rule of law. Only an idiot would throw it out over this. A review of Berman's speech shows that his entire economic argument is based on worldwide figures for the piracy of mass produced hard goods -- There is no doubt that piracy causes substantial harm to copyright owners. The evidence is everywhere and the numbers are staggering. In 2001, the U.S. recording industry lost $4.2 billion to hard-goods piracy worldwide, the U.S. movie industry lost $3 billion to videocassette piracy, and the U.S. entertainment software industry lost $1.9 billion due to piracy in just fourteen countries. In 2000, hard- goods piracy cost the U.S. business software industry alone $11.8 billion. He readily admits there are no reliable figures to gauge the actual economic impact of P2P piracy. He extrapolates his extraordinary claims from a Viant study, The Copyright Crusade, on P2P network piracy. The study indicates that online piracy is a serious issue and worthy of considerable effort. But it in no way suggests, authorizes, endorses, or supports the outrageous claims of Mr. Berman. InfoWorld quotes Berman as claiming that "billions" of files are pirated each month, yet he has little supporting evidence. The childish statements by his spokeswomen in the same article, and the admission that the bill has little chance of passing noted in a brief review at IEEE-USA are clear indicators of Berman's disingenuous nature. A review of the CCIA site shows no mention of the Berman fiasco and, given the organization's stand on other Internet-related issues, it seems unlikely they would support such a stupid proposal. Moreover, if Berman really wanted something this asinine put into law he certainly wouldn't announce it in public. He sits on the House Judiciary Committee and the Subcommittee on the Courts, Internet, and Intellectual Property, and could easily broker an amendment to some unrelated bill if that were his real intent. Berman also claims: "Internet piracy threatens to undermine the symbiosis between the technology and media industries." My question is just who is this vaunted symbiosis supposed to benefit? This reminds me of Bob Frankston's quote [via Mark Bernstein] on the net industry's fixation on entertainment -- "You'd think the purpose of a roof is to keep rain off the television." It is unfortunate that a legislator who is directly responsible for Internet regulation has no more regard for the truth than Congressman Berman has shown. For whatever else he may have done, Mr. Berman has shown himself a shallow, feckless shill for the RIAA and Hollywood fatcats, and someone who has little connection to real-world Internet users, their issues, or their concerns. Rather than fanning the flames of his PR effort, we should be reaching out to the constituents of CA28 and letting them know they have a poser in Congress. And that, come election time, Mr. Berman should be sent to the unemployment line. Perhaps it's time to support one of Mr. Berman's opponents. The Unofficial List of Candidates for the November 5 General Election provided by the California Secretary of State lists Berman's opponents as follows:
DAVID R. HERNANDEZ, JR. -- Republican
KELLEY L. ROSS -- Libertarian More on RSS, Blog ToolsDorothea at Caveat Lector has some outstanding explanatory posts on HTML, RSS, and other items. This one is on RSS and has some good resources I missed when I made my earlier post.HTML Markup TutorialDorothea sends us to school on html markup. I just browsed (it's late), but it looks like soem easy-to-grasp explanations of some things -- like DIV tags and such -- that may as well be Greek to me.And don't miss this follow-up.
|
ContactTerry W. Frazier 1041 Honey Creek Road Suite 281 Conyers, GA 30013 770-918-1937 office 404-822-6014 mobile
Wide.angle
K.log
Un.commontary
Tech.knowlogy
Legal
Body.politic
Books
Radio.active
Design.graph
Ref.useful
Atlanta.area
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Page was last updated: 2/9/2003; 11:01:12 AM License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|