Recently

Blog Channels
Coming Soon!

Theme and CSS
IT Support
Hosting and comments

Tuesday, July 23, 2002

Business Use for Instant Messaging

Ernie the Attorney provides a short, succinct scenario for the business use of IM. It will become common in the enterprise.
Business Use for Instant Messaging?  - Yep, apparently Lands End uses it to answer customer questions as they browse the catalogue company's website.  The cheery representatives will even use IM to redirect the customer to a particular page on the website if necessary.

I see IM working its way into law firms too.  The other day was illustrative.  I was on the phone with an important client in one of those situations where I couldn't get off the phone no matter what happened.  A call came in on my other line, and I ignored it.  Thirty seconds later I was paged by the receptionist.  I had to E-mail her to let her know I was on the phone, and we traded E-mails so that I could (1) find out who was looking for me (2) tell her to tell the person to call back in 10 minutes.  All of this took more time than it should have.  Instant Messaging would have been much faster.  Of course, now I suspect most law firms will view IM as some sort of frilly toy. [Ernie the Attorney]


Self-publishing Firm Provides More Marketing Support

Following the M.J. Rose column today, which covered big-name publishers picking up self-published work and taking advantage of authors' self-promotional initiative, iUniverse has annouced a marketing kit to help their authors get more attention. Every little bit helps.

iUniverse Introduces Marketing Toolkit

07/23/2002

Answering a need voiced by thousands of authors worldwide, iUniverse, Inc., announced today the launch of its Author Marketing Toolkit, a complete, customized marketing guide that helps authors publicize their work, create demand and sell books. [iUniverse]


Broadcast Brouhaha

Thanks to Ernie the Attorney for this one. This business with the Fritz bill, and the FCC broadcast flag brouhaha is asinine. Some argument may be made (I don’t necessarily buy it) that government intervention is called for to protect certain industries and American jobs from foreign competition. But since when does the government of the US of A intervene to protect specific industries from their own customers?! How idiotic is that?

From the New York Times:

Hollywood studios have maintained that they will not send digital copies of movies and other programming over the airwaves unless safeguards are in place to prevent perfect copies from being redistributed online. That, in turn, is seen as holding back the market for digital televisions and the on-demand services that might come with them.
I can assure you this is not the case, and if it is the market will respond with a solution far better for consumers than what the television networks purport to do. There is no way that legislation written by a bunch of sold-out, technology-ignorant legislators for the sole purpose of protecting an entrenched media aristocracy can do anything but harm for consumers and the market in general.

Legislators should be debating the extent of copyright protection, the applicable penalties for violation, and what -- if any -- changes should be made in the balance between spurring innovation and rewarding creators. Nothing more. As Ernie said in Ignorance is Bliss

Sometimes too many people working together on one thing do not create a bold new thing. Instead, they create a patchwork of compromise, where the whole is vastly less than the sum of the parts.

This happens in lawmaking too, but mostly because of the influence of lobbyists representing special interest groups. It's not just a problem of too many people, but rather it's a problem of people having too much information.

First, every legislator should be forced to read The Broadband Difference: How online Americans' behavior changes with high-speed Internet connections at home from the Pew Internet Project. If they can’t read it themselves then they should be tied in a room and have it forcibly read to them. Then they should be required to go to the blackboard and write 100 times each, “The Internet is not cable TV. The Internet is not cable TV. The Internet is not cable TV…”

This whole episode shows how woefully ignorant most of our legislators are regarding basic economics, market theory, and basic technology. And my, how thinly they disguise their motives.


Currently Reading:

Flawless Consulting by Peter Block is one of the better how-to books on consulting I've read.

Flawless Consulting by Peter Block

Following my theme of not looking for a job, maybe what I'm really doing is looking for many jobs. I spent a couple of years in the late 1990s working for a small consulting company, so I know how hard it is to do the job right and get paid. There are all sorts of trade-offs between:

Search this site:
July 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jun   Aug

Contact

Terry W. Frazier
1041 Honey Creek Road
Suite 281
Conyers, GA 30013
 
770-918-1937 office
404-822-6014 mobile

  Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.     blogchat: If diamond is GREEN click to chat

Wide.angle
K.log
Un.commontary
Tech.knowlogy
Legal
Body.politic
Books
Radio.active
Design.graph
Ref.useful
Atlanta.area