b.cognoscoA quest to examine, inquire, and learn. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recently
Blog Channels Coming Soon!
Theme and CSS
IT Support
Hosting and comments
|
Sunday, July 21, 2002Sen. Earnest Hollings Should Be Removed from Officecomment []
Digital Asset Management -- A Disappearing ActIs Digital Asset Management (DAM) losing its value? According to this article in CIO:Digital asset management (DAM) products may be a hot topic now, but a January report by Stamford, Conn.-based Meta Group predicts that by 2004 or 2005, such tools will likely evolve into nothing more than a set of features inside more complete enterprise content management tools." [CIO] In 1999, while working for print industry consulting firm CAP Ventures, I wrote a fairly extensive research paper on Digital Asset Management for the print industry. (While a bit dated, you can still read the executive summary from that paper.) Even back then I concluded that any discussion of DAM was incomplete without considering a much broader media context. But there is still a need for properly handling files for print, and many in the print industry can still use smaller systems than those sold by Artesia or Bulldog/Documentum. This brief article is a good summary of the current state of DAM, covering several applications and giving a brief overview of the wide variety in price and features that today's products offer Visible KMHugh Madison at American Invisible provides a thought provoking post on what it takes for KM to really succeed. Hugh has clearly been there before.KM Hugh's RSS feed didn't include some key points from his story, so I've listed a few below: A successful KM initiative needs:There's a pattern here. See it? As Robert Buckman said in the interview John Robb posted yesterday, 90 percent of the effort put into the Knowledge Sharing system at Buckman Labs was spent encouraging people to share. And as I wrote in The Power of Knowledge Sharing, while some people will refuse to do this, most people simply don't know how. The fact that the cost barriers for KM tools have plummeted means that those of us who already want to share can do so with less effort and less dollars. Now, how do we get those don't already want to, to join the group and be effective? Windley on Blogs for Sprawling OrganizationsEnterprise Development in Utah.On Wednesday, I spoke to the enterprise development group on my principles for enabling web services. The enterprise development group, or eDG as they call themselves is a group of specialists from across our IT organizations that meet regularly to share expertise and develop some de facto standards for multi-tiered applications in Utah. I'm very supportive of these kinds of groups since I think they represent our best hope at building community in an IT organization that is best described as "sprawling." We have talented experts buried deep within the organization and, often, the biggest problem we face is being able to get the right people on the job. When an issue comes up, we likely have someone who knows just want to do, but no way to get that expertise to the job. Building overlapping communities of specialists and communities of interests seems the best way to attack this problem. My open offer on blogs is an attempt to jump start some of those communities. [Windley's Enterprise Computing Weblog]Klogs Get Official Support in UtahK-logging at the statewide level. Top down endorsement for klogging..The Utah State CIO made this Offer to Utah State IT Employees.
"It is good to be king." Royal suggestions cut through all kinds of trust issues and formal decision making. I've been asking for prerequisites to success on various knowledge management lists. Uniformly the top answer is "senior management endorsement, buy-in, enthusiasm." UserLand's hit a sweet spot too.
One other thing: you can see from Windley's post there is something real about the sense of ownership and control you feel when the tool and your writings are on your desktop. Radio gives you this. The tradeoffs of remote access and managed desktop are also real, but have much less emotional investment. These feelings of control worth of attention as the klogging meme spreads. I'll have to encourage my buddy Bill Kendall, who's in the Salt Lake City D.A.'s office, to look into this. (Granted, that's city and not state government, but wouldn't it be interesting to see that combination as well?) [tins ::: Rick Klau's weblog]Knowledge Networks for the Cost ConsciousCreating affordable Knowledge Sharing networks seems to be a theme these days, given the unmitigated failure of big-buck alternatives. David Gammel of High Context goes the final mile and provides a nice overview of creating an almost no-cost KS network.
Low-cost Klog Network There are very important ideas in this:
Young, entrepreneurial companies eat away from the bottom of the big Dilbert-company markets, but to do so they have to move fast and spread themselves thin. Most struggle to reach across geographic boundaries for anything more than marketing or a little customer support. True knowledge sharing across the country is just about impossible for the small- to mid-sized enterprise. ASPs, Salesforce.com, and MSOutlook's Public Folders haven't really helped. Most still get by on sheer luck and determination. What David describes can be done by almost anyone with access to a geek. And not an uber-geek. Probably any 17-year-old with a knack for Python or pearl will do. That's still too techie for me, but even if you have to shell out $40 for Radio it's still an affordable way to get started. This is great stuff, David. Thanks for bringing it to us.
|
ContactTerry W. Frazier 1041 Honey Creek Road Suite 281 Conyers, GA 30013 770-918-1937 office 404-822-6014 mobile
Wide.angle
K.log
Un.commontary
Tech.knowlogy
Legal
Body.politic
Books
Radio.active
Design.graph
Ref.useful
Atlanta.area
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Page was last updated: 2/9/2003; 11:17:18 AM License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|