|
Wednesday, January 7, 2004 |
I spotted Jons post
on dynamic languages and enterprise VMs. I totally agree that dynamic
languages can make many things easier - particulary integration &
glue code.
We as an industry, particularly in the area of enterprise application
development should step back a little and try make things much easier
to do, to use, to integrate & reuse. Things are often way too hard;
especially in J2EE. Making things RESTful and allowing neat
integration with dynamic languages are a great help.
One nitpick though...
Somebody asked me yesterday why platform vendors like
Microsoft and Sun are never at the forefront of dynamic-language
innovation.
Well I don't know why Sun has to be at the forefront but certainly there's already heaps of good dynamic languages for
the JVM. These all happened without the need for Sun to intervene. Sure
maybe Sun could maybe acknowledge them abit more but other than that
what else does it need to do?
4:29:10 PM
|
|
Joe's been doing some wacky stuff lately making a binary executable version of groovy or turning groovy scripts into executables. Neat stuff.
I can imagine this being a neat way of using groovy on .NET / Mono
platforms; use the binary build of groovy, link in .NET / Mono and add
a little glue to make .NET / Mono objects look like POGOs and hey
presto you can script .NET / Mono objects in groovy along with Java
objects.
11:11:23 AM
|
|
© Copyright 2007 James Strachan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2004 |
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
Dec Feb |
|
|
|
|
|
|