Updated: 24.11.2002; 18:23:17 Uhr.
disLEXia
lies, laws, legal research, crime and the internet
        

Sunday, October 6, 2002

Moved to a new house and now we are stuck for some days with Internet on a 28.8k connection. That is real hard to endure. Plus: WLAN does not work here.
23:21 #

DVD Copying Software Sparks New Legal Battle

321 Studios is heading to court to find out why you can legally make copies of video tapes and CDs, but not DVDs.

[ ... ]

The software maker plans to release on October 31 a product called DVD X Copy, which allows users to create "bit-for-bit" copies of their DVDs using a standard recordable DVD drive, says company president Robert Moore.

While the software promises to give consumers the same privileges they have for copying VHS movies, it is potentially against the law, according to industry experts. A U.S. legislation called the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act deems it illegal to distribute tools that circumvent copy prevention technologies used to protect DVD content. That is just what 321 Studios' software does.

[ ... ]

"We believe those provisions in the DMCA are unconstitutional because they basically trump the fair use rights," says Michael Page, an attorney with Kecker and Van Nest in San Francisco, who is part of the legal team representing 321 Studios in its lawsuit. "If you make it illegal to make a backup copy of a work that you lawfully own, you have overstepped the legitimate bounds of the Copyright Act."

The DMCA ties the hands of software makers, says von Lohmann, who has helped fight similar cases against the DMCA. It is not against the law for users to own copies of their DVD movies, but the DMCA prohibits the distribution of any tools that make such copying possible.

"If someone wants to make fair use of a DVD they bought, they need to circumvent the copy protection technology to do that," von Lohmann says. "The DMCA would arguably make that illegal.

"If nobody can build the tools, then essentially we've all been denied our fair use rights," he says.

[Privacy Digest]
23:02 # G!

Open Debate Between RIAA VP And DMCA Critic

A GW student writes "The George Washington University's School of Engineering and Applied Science along with the Cyberspace Policy Institute are sponsoring some kind (hasn't really been decided yet) of debate between Stanley Pierre-Louis, Vice President Legal Affairs for the Recording Industry Association of America and Professor James Boyle of Duke Law School. Remember, Prof. Boyle just received an anonymous $1 million to fight the DMCA. The event is open to the public. It will take place on Tuesday October 8 in Washington, DC on GW's campus. The abstract and other details are here. Stick around, and the next day you can go to the Supreme Court to see Lawrence Lessig argue Eldred v. Ashcroft."

[Privacy Digest]
23:00 # G!

Judge brands song swap laws 'unclear'

A US judge has said that the law governing the trading of music files over the internet is unclear.

District Judge John D Bates was hearing a test case brought by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) which aims to help put an end to the online swapping of copyright music.

The music companies want to force internet service provider Verizon to reveal the identity of a subscriber who allegedly used its services to trade copyrighted songs.

If they can obtain the names and addresses of song-swappers - without going to court first - they can bombard them with written warnings ordering them to stop.

[ ... ]

Verizon argued that it should not be required to monitor its users' activities.

It said that a ruling in favour of the music industry would breach its subscribers' privacy, and set a precedent which could force other internet companies to provide their customers' names.

[ ... ]

Verizon says it would be unfair to cancel users accounts unless the music companies concerned filed formal legal proceedings that would give the users a chance to fight back.

But the music industry says that would take too long.

[Privacy Digest]
22:59 # G!

New software from Perimele brings security and total document control to Law Firms using MS Office.. Any firm using MS Office applications such as Word, Excel or Powerpoint can now ensure confidentiality of information with a security add-in that controls who can save, copy, forward or print documents, and when they can access them. (Includes protection against screen shots of documents and prevents recipients from pasting material into other documents). [PRWEB 2002-10-05] [PR Web - Legal]

I wonder how they implemented protection from photographing the screen - perhaps by using a marketing lie?
22:52 #


Maximillian Dornseif, 2002.
 
October 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Sep   Nov

Search


Subsections of this WebLog


Subscribe to "disLEXia" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.