The Humphreys IP Buzz : Dedicated to commentary on copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and patents and legal issues centered on software, knowledge management, outsourcing, virtual organizations, ASP's and contracts. This is NOT legal advice.
Updated: 2/2/03; 2:43:21 PM.

 

Subscribe to "The Humphreys IP Buzz" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Wednesday, January 29, 2003

It's Mattel's fight over the use of the Barbie name. The US Supreme Court did not take the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals verdict against Mattel. A song commented on the Barbie persona, and that did not raise a trademark issue for these courts.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1043457917332
8:57:03 PM    comment []


Courts continue to struggle with whether to take jurisdiction over internet cases. Toys R Us won a vicotry in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals that allowed discovery of information that could lead to jurisdiction in New Jersey over a Spanish company that was using the same name or a similar name. Toys R Us owns the "Imaginarium" name in the US, and the Spanish company owns rights in the "Imaginarium" name in Spain. Over the internet, there could be a conflict. Trademarks are specific to particular countries or jurisdictions, but the internet is not.

It's very expensive to create a worldwide brand, but these kinds of conflicts will arise as the same or similar names get used in different countries.

The Madrid trademark treaty that the US is in the process of joining is supposed to make these sorts of conflicts happen less, but there will still be a substantial expense in protecting intellectual property, and many struggling businesses will choose not to protect their marks in faraway places.

This decision doesn't necessarily mean there will be jurisdiction in a US court over the Spanish company, but it does mean that expensive litigation is going to proceed.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1043457920839
4:50:31 PM    comment []


Tech Trends New York Law Journal

Although the term is commonly used, electronic discovery is little understood and the debate rages on about who should pay for its exorbitant cost. The New York Law Journal takes a look at this and other technology trends such as IT outsourcing and automated rules-based calendar databases to avoid missed court dates and deadlines that can lead to malpractice claims. http://www6.law.com/lawcom/display_id.cfm?statename=NY&docnum=179057&table=news&flag=full
4:18:50 PM    comment []


© Copyright 2003 Noel D. Humphreys.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

 


January 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Nov   Feb
 2/2/03
 2/2/03
 2/2/03
 2/2/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/31/03
 1/29/03
 1/29/03
 1/28/03
 1/28/03
 1/23/03
 1/23/03
 1/23/03
 1/23/03
 1/23/03
 1/23/03
 1/23/03
 1/23/03