| |
|
Monday, November 25, 2002
|
|
Recently someone mentioned a Wired article - The Long Boom: A History
of the Future. And I finally read it over the weekend.
A disconcerting read - not by how right they turned out to be or by how wrong
they turned out to be - but by how it is mostly neither, how in so many places
they are right and wrong at the same time. In some places, you glimpse the
naive.
Research by a few economists, like Stanford University's Paul
Romer, suggests that fundamentally new technologies generally don't become
productive until a generation after their introduction, the time it takes
for people to really learn how to use them in new ways. Sure enough, about
a generation after the introduction of personal computers in the workplace,
work processes begin mutating enough to take full advantage of the tool.
Soon after, economists figure out how to accurately measure the true gains
in productivity - and take into account the nebulous concept of improvement
in quality rather than just quantity.
And, I must confess, I likely read it at the time and thought it brilliant
(it was).
Its over optimism helps give balance, caution, to any current over pessimism.
The quote is right, new technologies generally don't become productive
until a generation after their introduction. And for that generation
there are new technologies to wrestle with. At once we triumph and we tremble
before the next challenge.
The Long Boom: A History of the Future, 1980 - 2020
By Peter Schwartz and Peter Leyden, Wired, July, 1997
We're facing 25 years of prosperity, freedom, and a better
environment for the whole world. You got a problem with that?
And then this current article on the ongoing evolution of the banking industry,
one of the first hit by the forces of digital adapt or die. Helps place it
all into perspective. Evolution continues - be it business process change
or social change.
Banking behind the scenes
From the McKinsey Quarterly, Special to CNET News.com, November 24,
2002, 4:00 AM PT
Banks constantly battle to streamline their back-office "factories,"
with good cause--these facilities can be responsible for up to half of their
operating costs, excluding interest.
5:58:26 AM
|
|
Dan Gillmor: Cash cards rule in Hong Kong. San Jose Mercury News columnist Dan Gillmor reports from Hong Kong on the Octopus card.
Octopus is easily the world's most successful experiment to date in stored-value, electronic cash cards. Instead of pulling out bills and coins in subways, buses, fast-food restaurants and convenience stores, customers wave purses and wallets past devices that deduct dollars from their cards inside.
These are not debit cards, the widely used system in the United States. With debit cards, money gets deducted from bank accounts during transactions.
Octopus cards are the real thing when it comes to cash cards. They are equivalent to cash. You put value into them, spend it down and then replenish the money if you want to keep using it.
They're like cash in another crucial way. If the user prefers, they are entirely anonymous -- that is, not linked to any bank account or other personal information.
An earlier report in ComputerWeekly mentions both Octopus and Sony's EDY e-purse as likely to succeed in their respective markets. Operating in Japan through a separate company named BitWallet, Sony's EDY electronic money system is being adopted by Japanese finance companies. [Scott Loftesness]
4:17:01 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2006 Russ Savage.
Last update: 5/8/06; 8:59:50 PM.
|
|
| November 2002 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
| 3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| 10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
| 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
| 24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
| Oct Dec |
|
|