| |
 |
Montag, 20. Januar 2003 |
If this is true (as it appears to be), then it's totally sick! [Paolo Valdemarin: Paolo's Weblog]... sick? ... sick!
There are countless sites that mimick Apple tab-on-top look or even the Apple Aqua UI look. Imagine Apple would start to enforce IP on that ...
How can they patent this? Can anyone remember the product NetObjects Fusion in its very first incarnation. It already had this navigation-on-top and navigation-on-the-side look, that became typical for site created with NetObjects. You could tell from miles away when a site was a NetObjects site! Do these idiots work through NetObjects customer files now?
8:28:06 PM  
|
|
While Mozilla the way I tuned it still works faster for most of the sites that I visit, I think Safari has the better visual quality. It not just the oure rendering, it's the way things look (can't reallly be more specific). A lot of pages just look a bit rought in Mozilla and way more polished in Safari.
Connection handling still seems to be better in Mozilla, but I see no reason why Safari could not catch up in this area!
The same goes for tabbed browsing. Safari could introduce tabbed browsing (but that requires pretts nifty connection handling because you'll end up loading more than one page simultaneously). It is doable, but they need to do it! I simply see no success for Safari without support for tabbed browsing or similar functionality!
The best thing Mozilla could do? Provide a reasonable pref panel for the hidden prefs that allow a lot of useful tuning! As long as only black magic can make Mozilla perform it will loose to Safari!
6:25:41 PM
|
|
© Copyright 2003 cipher.
Mac and the Mac logo are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.
The Made on a Mac Badge is a trademark of Apple Computer, Inc., used with permission.
|
|
