Med Rib

November 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Oct   Dec


 30 November 2003

Does Race Exist?

Scientific American: Does Race Exist? [ BIOLOGY ]
If races are defined as genetically discrete groups, no. But researchers can use some genetic information to group individuals into clusters with medical relevance ...


  comment []6:16:36 PM    

Sorious Samura

CryFreetown interview

“….To attempt to explain what really happened in Sierra Leone to anyone who has never seen or tasted a war of our magnitude is a real uphill task, especially after the refusal of international media to send journalists to cover the world's worst crimes against humanity at the end of the 20th Century. People will just not believe you - they'll simply think you're inventing things.

People will only believe that things like mass killings, rapings, amputations, maimings and so on are stories of the past, only accepted to be events of the 12th Century when people like Jesus Christ were beaten and nailed on crosses. I know you will say such things don't happen now - these are modern times - we are civilised people living in a modern world. Well, all these atrocities were committed here on earth, in Sierra Leone, a small West African state just as we approached the turn of a new century - the 21st Century.

So I felt that if I can properly document the shocking and horrific images of a war I risked my life to cover, then no one will deny the fact it never happened. Moreover, knowing that a country like Sierra Leone and many other African countries only occupy the very bottom end on the UN Index ladder I felt that I will be able to get the rest of the world to understand about the neglect of the African people and at least set a few minds thinking of how to help reverse in Sierra Leone and Africa in general.

Some viewers might say the barbarity of the documentary is too graphic, and this might be true - but I still believe that the case of brothers killing, raping, and maiming their own brothers and sisters who have lived in the same community is proof of how neglect, greed and corruption can reduce human beings to lowly, beastly life and therefore must be seen in the hope that it will send all of us into deep soul searching... Africans as well as non-Africans, especially the mineral thirsty hunters with blood on their hands, and not to mention the power hungry mad guys of Africa who may be contemplating using similar methods to enthrone themselves.

Also, my personal conviction was that once these repulsive, barbaric, ghastly stories of the war and of neglect by the West is put into proper context and shown to the outside world, a platform for corrections would have been built and very serious lessons would have been learnt. I believe that we now have got some people thinking maybe, just maybe this could be the first step to start turning the African Continent around and go back to what we used to be, “our brothers keepers” which is very African instead of “our brothers killers”.

So many Africans have been accusing the West of their hypocrisy and disrespect for Africa so I felt this was the best opportunity to show this clearly to the world how true that was and I'm sure the documentary not only succeeded in shaming the West but also clearly showed how the manipulative meddling diamond-crazy West has not only succeeded in creating a monstrous African continent but that they are not the ones being attacked by these monsters. ….”

Sorious Samura’s Africa

Sierra Leone


  comment []6:09:49 PM    

It’s better than nothing.

Poor world ‘cuts climate gases’

By Alex Kirby
BBC News Online environment correspondent

Many poor countries are working to cut their emissions of greenhouse gases, a senior United Nations official says.

Although they do not yet have to act under the international climate treaty, she says, they are wasting no time. She says the treaty itself, the Kyoto Protocol, which has not yet become part of international law, is "a peanut - but a vital one in the long run".

And she believes its signatories are committed to making it work whether or not the treaty is eventually ratified. The official is Ms Joke Waller-Hunter, executive secretary of the UN Climate Change Convention. The countries which have signed the convention are meeting in the Italian city of Milan from 1 to 12 December "to assess progress in addressing climate change".

Staying away

The protocol will enter into force only when 55 signatories have ratified it: they must include industrialised countries responsible for 55% of the developed world's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 1990. Some critics say President Bush's decision that the US, which emits more greenhouse gases than any other country, will not ratify the protocol condemns it to irrelevance.

But enough other signatories have done so for it to enter into force if and when Russia, another big polluter, ratifies. So far President Putin has not said it will ratify.

Ms Waller-Hunter told BBC News Online at the convention's offices in the German city of Bonn:

There are 119 countries which have ratified the protocol, and I get the impression they are committed to implementing it regardless of it entering into force.

In the developing countries, known in the protocol as non-Annex One countries, we're seeing a keen interest in Kyoto.

Countries like India, China and Cuba are all waiting for the protocol's clean development mechanism to start working - that will let richer countries invest in projects to cut greenhouse gases in the developing world.

The rapidly industrialising countries see their environmental and economic interests coinciding. China is really decoupling energy use from GDP.

Only a start

The protocol aims to reduce emissions of six gases scientists say are helping to change the climate. If it is implemented, industrialised countries' emissions will by some time between 2008 and 2012 be cut to 5.2% below their 1990 levels. But many scientists say cuts of around 60-70% will be needed by mid-century to avoid runaway climate change.

Ms Waller-Hunter said: “It's wrong to think the protocol will do so little that it's insignificant.

It's a very important first step that can lead to much more far-reaching measures. Yes, it's a peanut - but a vital one in the long run.

At the moment only the industrialised (Annex One) countries have to cut their emissions, but within a few years these cuts will be obligatory for every country.

Backsliding begun

Ms Waller-Hunter said: “We have to look at a future of increasing carbon constraints. And we shall have to find ways of making the principle of equity a reality, or it will be very hard to get the poorer countries involved.

The overall aim of stabilising emissions has been met, but mainly because of cuts by countries in transition, [the former members of the Soviet Union]. The UK and Germany have performed well, but not all their European partners - Spain's emissions have risen by 46%.

The Milan meeting, much of which is highly technical, will also receive a report on emission trends and projections. Whatever voluntary efforts the poorer countries are making, this shows the combined emissions of Europe, Japan, the US and other highly industrialised countries could grow by 8% between 2000 and 2010.

This would take them to 17% above their 1990 levels, in stark contrast with the rich countries' Kyoto commitment to achieve significant cuts.

unfccc - U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change

ipcc - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change


  comment []6:05:26 PM    

Rainbow Warrior Crew Weblog

Monkeyfist.com

Webraw/blog

conscientious

things magazine

Maud Newton

Kick in the head

Bite me webcomic


  comment []6:03:15 PM