Med Rib

December 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Nov   Jan


 01 December 2003

  comment []6:37:01 PM    

COUNTERPUNCH

wow.


  comment []5:25:04 PM    

Genocide of a Generation

By Robin Lustig
BBC presenter

It's now more than three years since I met Pepile, but I still think of her often.

She died of Aids soon after I met her.

I'll be thinking of her even more than usual over the coming weeks as the BBC launches a two-week season of programmes and online coverage devoted to the HIV epidemic.

Pepile was seven years old, and had been infected when her neighbour raped her. He thought that he would be cured of Aids if he had sex with a young girl.

She lived, and died, in South Africa, the country where there are more people living with HIV/Aids than anywhere else in the world. Globally, the number of those infected is now more than 42 million; by the end of the decade it will have grown by another 45 million. Half of the people living with HIV/Aids are women; more than half are under the age of 24.

Stark statistics

Enough numbers? Here are some more: the populations of India, Russia and China make up half of the world's total population.

In all three countries, there are already clear signs of an Aids epidemic taking hold.

Nearly a million people are believed to be infected in Russia; more than a million in China, between four and five million in India. Every time I see those numbers, I think of Pepile. Her father and brother had already died of Aids by the time I met her: the estimate now is that there are 14 million children around the world who have lost one or both of their parents to Aids.

Hitting the poor

Perhaps you live in a country where Aids is under control. Lucky you.

But do you, or people you know, travel to countries where it is widespread? Do people from those countries come to where you live? Globalisation means that viruses can cross borders just as easily as people can.

It is, of course, the poorest countries that suffer most. But whereas in the past it was the weakest who died in epidemics - usually the very young and the very old - AIDS is different.

It kills young adults: the producers, the parents, the farmers. If factory workers die, production falls. If parents die, children are orphaned and their education brought to a halt. And if farmers die, food production suffers, and those who are left behind go hungry.

Funds for the fight

In 1999, the world's richest countries made available about $300 m to fight HIV/Aids. Within three years that figure had risen 10-fold to $3 billion. By 2005, it's estimated that at least $10.5 billion will be needed.

The money is needed to buy drugs, to enable people with HIV/Aids to live longer. It is needed to pay for education - to teach girls how to say no to unwanted or unprotected sex. And it is needed to pay for health care, because all the available evidence shows that where basic health care is deficient, Aids spreads more quickly.

Wake-up call

There is, as yet, no known cure for Aids. But there are known ways to slow its spread and to reduce its capacity to destroy communities. The race against what the UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan has called "the genocide of a generation" is a marathon, not a sprint.

When political leaders talk about it openly and honestly, when the world's richest countries wake up to the scale of the disaster, and when individual men and women learn how to change their behaviour to minimise the risk of infection - then, and only then, might we able to say that the race is being won.

BBC- The AIDS debate

 

Nearly 50 000 adults in the United Kingdom now have HIV

Stephen Pincock

London

The number of people infected with HIV in the United Kingdom increased by almost 20% between 2001 and 2002, from 41 700 to 49 500, says a report published by the Health Protection Agency to mark world AIDS day, 1 December.

Also, the proportion of people who acquire their infection in the United Kingdom, as opposed to overseas, is increasing, the report says.

Kevin Fenton, a public health consultant on HIV at the agency, said, "World AIDS day reminds us that the problems we face with HIV are not going away, despite it being a disease that is largely preventable. The group most at risk of contracting HIV in the UK remains gay and bisexual men, accounting for about 80% (1500) of the new diagnoses in 2002 that were likely to have been acquired in the UK."

An increase in high risk sexual behaviour among gay and bisexual men has also led to major rises in the rates of other sexually transmitted infections. For example, the number of cases of gonorrhoea among gay men has almost doubled (from 1842 in 1999 to 3363 in 2002), and cases of syphilis have increased from 52 to 607 over the same period. As sexually transmitted infections facilitate the transmission of HIV, it is possible that the rise in these diseases may have played a part in the increase in HIV infection among gay men.

Among heterosexual people the number of infections of HIV likely to have been acquired in this country increased from 147 in 1998 to 275 in 2002. Again, increases in sexually transmitted infections—which have been most marked in young people and some ethnic minority communities—mean that the risk of onward transmission of HIV among heterosexual people in the United Kingdom remains a public health concern.

These rises are putting sexual health services under increasing pressure, and services will need to respond to the growing number and varied needs of people who are HIV positive, the report says.

It highlights a number of prevention strategies, including offering annual tests for HIV to gay and bisexual men attending genitourinary clinics, and doing further studies of sexual behaviour among HIV positive people.

Renewing the Focus: HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United Kingdom in 2002 is available at www.hpa.org.uk


  comment []5:14:50 PM    

Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010

Fiona Fleck

Geneva

The number of children left as orphans because their parents have died from AIDS related diseases in sub-Saharan Africa is expected to almost double—to 20 million—over the next seven years and could account for as many as 12% of all the region's children, says a new Unicef report.

The report, Africa's Orphaned Generations, published this week, said that the new findings signal dire consequences ahead for a region already devastated by the pandemic. It said that many affected countries still have no national policy to tackle the growing needs of AIDS orphans, and this could have grave consequences not just for the children but for communities and society as a whole. Many households have become poorer owing to the pandemic, and increasing numbers of families are headed by women and grandparents and are struggling to care for these children.

"The international community must not shy away from this problem and must substantially increase support to protect AIDS orphans from the pain and isolation—sometimes even abuse—that can result from the loss of one or both parents," said David Bull, the executive director of Unicef in the United Kingdom. The report predicted that the number of AIDS orphans would rise from an estimated 11 million in 2001 to 20 million in 2010 as a result of the high proportion of adults with HIV or AIDS and the failure to deliver antiretroviral treatment to sub-Saharan Africa.

According to Unicef and UNAIDS figures for 2003, only 1% of some 29 million people with HIV or AIDS in the region are receiving this treatment. Botswana, Lesotho, and Swaziland, which have some of the world's highest prevalence rates of AIDS and HIV, and Zimbabwe are expected to have the most AIDS orphans. The report said that a fifth of children in these countries were likely to be AIDS orphans in 2010.

Unicef found that in 1990 about 3.5% of orphans had lost a mother, father, or both parents to the AIDS pandemic. By 2001 this figure had risen to 32%, but by 2010 more than half the region's orphans are expected to be AIDS orphans, the report said.

"Orphans are disadvantaged in numerous ways. In addition to the trauma of witnessing the sickness and death of their parents, they are likely to be poorer and less healthy than non-orphans," Mr Bull said.

The report is available at www.unicef.org/media/files/orphans.pdf

 


  comment []5:13:12 PM    

Selling sterilization to Addicts

By Clare Murphy
BBC News Online

To its critics, Project Prevention or Crack - an American organisation which pays drug addicts and alcoholics to be sterilised - is a terrifying throwback to the neutering of "defectives" during the 20th Century.

But the woman who runs this not-for-profit programme believes she is offering a service to everyone: the drug addict, the taxpayer, the child who has not yet been born, and if she has her way - will never be born.

As the programme - which offers both sterilisation and long term birth control - reaches its fifth anniversary, Barbara Harris also believes she has cause to celebrate. Some 1,050 addicts have taken up the offer as part of her programme over the past five years.

It may not seem a considerable number, but, Ms Harris stresses, the number of clients has more than doubled over the past 12 months compared with the year before. "Basically, despite the initial controversy over the programme, people are starting to accept that it's a good idea. Probation officers, social workers and those who work on drug treatment programmes are increasingly referring their clients to us," she says.

Increasing presence

There is no way of independently verifying the figures given by Project Prevention, nor will the group divulge the names of institutes whose counsellors allegedly refer their clients to the programme - arguing that those people could fall foul of the authorities if their identities were revealed.

Some prisons - such as the Bernalillo County Detention Center in Albuquerque - have apparently allowed the group to host information sessions for their female inmates, but have stressed that this is not tantamount to a referral.

But what is undisputed is that the programme has expanded significantly over the past five years - growing from a small establishment in California to a nationwide programme with a presence in most major cities. As it has expanded, the tone of the group has also shifted.

Ms Harris, who was quoted in one of her first interviews as saying "We don't allow dogs to breed. We spay them. We neuter them. We try to keep them from having unwanted puppies, and yet these women are literally having litters of children," has since toned down her language.

Her project was initially referred to simply as CRACK (Children Requiring A Caring Community). Now it frequently uses the warmer term Project Prevention.

But the essence of her project remains the same. It offers drug addicts and alcoholics a sum of $200 for opting for a long-term form of birth control, such as sterilisation or a contraceptive implant. Those interested are asked to submit documents proving that they have been arrested on narcotic offences, or provide a doctor's letter as evidence that they use drugs.

After she or he has been accepted on the programme, fresh documents are then required to show that the procedure has indeed taken place. The money is then despatched. "Our principal aim is to stop children winding up in foster care or with long-term health problems, whose care puts an enormous burden on the taxpayer," says Ms Harris.

"If they spend the $200 on drugs, they spend it on drugs. It's none of our business what they do with the money we give them."

Historical analogies

Organisations like the National Advocates for Pregnant Women do not deny that there can be problems with children born of addicted parents but stress that many drug addicts become loving mothers and that their children in many cases do not suffer life-long health problems.

Project Prevention's statistics

1050 paid clients

1026 women

24 men

516 Caucasian

351 African-American

105 Hispanic

78 other ethnicity

The programme diverts efforts away from helping addicts to become clean, they argue. "Barbara Harris couldn't care less about the addicts themselves and what might be best for them. And while it may be dressed up in the language of choice, for them to argue that these people come to them entirely of their own free will is totally disingenuous," says Wyndi Anderson, co-ordinator for NAPW.

"The project targets poor women - and you tell me what sort of choice it is when its made by someone living in poverty and desperate for money. The whole project is eugenist, it recalls what went on in the 1930s in America, or even in Nazi Germany."

Laws authorising coerced sterilisations were passed in more than half of US states in the 1930s after lobbying from the American eugenics movement, which sought to further the existence of what it deemed to be the "genetically superior" and prevent reproduction among those it saw as inferior: "the licentious" and "the indolent".

America's legislation served as a model for the Nazis' programme of eugenics, which led to the extermination of Jews and the murder of many gypsies, the mentally ill, and homosexuals.

Ms Harris rejects any comparison.

"It's just nonsense. Nobody is forcing these people to do anything - it's their own decision. What infuriates me is that if my critics don't think these people are capable of making their mind up on an issue like this, why on earth do they think they are capable of bringing up a child?"

Time and reason

Ms Harris also has some influential, and wealthy, people on her side. Dr Laura Schlessinger, one of the nation's most popular radio talk-show hosts, has made hefty donations and has frequently plugged the project.

Richard Scaife, heir to the Mellon fortune in Pittsburgh, is also reported to have donated, along with Jim Woodhill, a right-wing venture capitalist from Texas. African-American writers favourable to the programme have also helped to rebuff criticism that the programme targets black people. Despite these luminaries, the group continues to attract negative coverage in the media and it raises hackles whenever it opens a new branch.

And while it is acknowledged that the group is making progress, the treatment of 1,050 drug addicts in five years remains a relatively inconsiderable number. This, however, appears to provide little solace to the critics. "It doesn't seem a lot, but the fact is that the group hasn't disappeared or faded away, and people are now starting to get used to it," says Ms Anderson of NAPW.

"As the saying goes: Time makes more converts than reason."

Project Prevention -FAQ

NAPW- National Advocates for Pregnant Women


  comment []1:41:43 PM    

46664

Nelson Mandela’s prisoner number for the 27 years he was in prison. I saw the concert with friends in a noisy central London pub and heard his speech. In a speech that was greeted by a hush he asked that people with HIV and AIDS not be reduced to mere numbers.

I was reminded of his speech at the Labour party conference a few years ago:

To applause, Mr Mandela told Labour delegates: "We have our reservations about globalisation. We must certainly not be afraid to condemn those aspects of globalisation which lead to more poverty in the world.

"We can no longer tolerate where few powers dominate the world ... All human beings are beings are born equal. They must be treated equally."

Speaking of his own country, Mr Mandela said that South Africa needed more help to fight aids. Ten teachers were dying each month from the disease, Mr Mandela said; at one university it was killing a student a week; and in another, 25% were HIV positive. He said that in a neighbouring country three cabinet ministers had died from Aids.

"We look to our friends to assist us to stave off that crisis," Mr Mandela said.

Highlights of the Saturday concert should be available today and you can also donate one minute of your life (and more) by mobile phone or internet.

Come on, it’s nearly Christmas.


  comment []1:38:45 PM    

What are graduates for?


  comment []1:37:25 PM