Ghost Dansing Comments [Radio Weblog]
Political Commentary and Analysis

 














Subscribe to "Ghost Dansing Comments [Radio Weblog]" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  14 August 2003

Bigoo.ws images for your blog

Here is a great article by Pete Zimmerman. The Republican administration has handled the Iraq war and its foreign policy in general, in the same style in which it conducts its everyday business. These people are marketeers, and only marketeers. Controlling the infosphere is ultimately their only methodology. Their "truth" is always the "truth as far as you know". Their strategy is always to be the only one with the microphone.

This Republican administration has done this country a massive disservice, jeapardizing the achievement of even our most legitimate objectives and undermining our international crediblity, no for having waged war on a tyrant, but for proceeding in an inept and obtuse fashion which snatchs defeat from the jaws of victory.

But, of course, this doesn't involve special persecution of a Democratic President and his family for eight years until he is finally caught in a fib about extramarital sex in the oval office, so it wouldn't capture the imagination of right-wingnuts as found on Lucianne.com.

From The Article:


"The president's principal argument for going to war -- to prevent a "smoking gun that would appear as a mushroom cloud" -- was based on bad intelligence that was misused while good intelligence was ignored."

"Political leaders must not tell intelligence analysts what to write; the intelligence services cannot tell the elected decision maker what to do. The president, of course, is free to disregard intelligence, but he is not free to lie about it -- either directly, indirectly or by innuendo -- when making the case for war."

"When an American president needs to take the nation to war, Americans must be able to trust him and must believe that the case for conflict is sound. The next time Bush wants to use armed force to preempt or prevent an attack on this country, he will have to prove his case far more completely than before. Two presidents of the United States have forfeited the benefit of the doubt."

The writer, a physicist, was chief scientist of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and science adviser for arms control at the State Department during the Clinton administration.


8:47:41 PM    comment [] trackback []

This site is a member of WebRing. To browse visit here.
Bigoo.ws images for your blog

Derrick has written a good comprehensive critique of the ongoing spin from Condi. The Republican administration is still trying to acquire what it should have had before the war: legitimacy.

Everybody knows Saddam is a bad man, running a bad regime. The question always was: "Is there an imminent threat?" That is the international litmus for a "go it alone" and the UN be damned policy of the US.

The US will ultimately have to go back to the UN, first to lend legitimacy to the invasion, and secondly, to relieve the stress on it economy resulting from single-handedly shouldering the responsiblity of rebuilding the country.

"THE COLD WAR QUEEN REMAINED FROZEN IN FACTS THAT MELTED INTO FICTION AS SHE TALKED. SPEAKING LAST WEEK BEFORE THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK JOURNALISTS, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER CONDOLEEZZA RICE SAID, ``LET US BE VERY CLEAR ABOUT WHY WE WENT TO WAR AGAINST SADDAM HUSSEIN. SADDAM HUSSEIN'S REGIME POSED A THREAT TO THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD. THIS WAS A REGIME THAT HAD PURSUED, HAD USED, AND POSSESSED WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.''
Rice did not dare tread upon the issues that were not clear. Her cocksure posture could not hide the fact that she made no other mention of weapons of mass destruction in her prepared remarks. The United States has yet to find any after nearly five months of war and occupation. This was after a war buildup where Bush officials boasted they were certain where the weapons were.

Just as significant is that there was not a single reference in her set speech about Saddam trying to acquire nuclear weapons. Before the war, Rice said, "we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." The scary vision of mushroom clouds was repeated by Bush and General Tommy Franks, head of Central Command. Vice President Dick Cheney declared Saddam to be a "mortal threat" on his way to "nuclear blackmail." In a question-and-answer session after her speech, Rice continued to assert that she was "certain to this day that this regime was a threat, that it was pursuing a nuclear weapon."

This is brazen, as Rice has yet to produce even a smoking gun. President Bush has already been shamed by his usage in his State of the Union address of the discredited claim that Saddam was trying to buy uranium in Africa.

Now there is more news that Bush officials trumped up the nuclear threat. The Washington Post reported over the weekend that administration officials repeatedly made claims in diplomatic and weapons inspections briefings that were not backed up, even by our own intelligence.

In scaring Americans into accepting an invasion of Iraq, the administration relied on earlier intelligence that Saddam was constructing new facilities at the site of a former nuclear weapons program. But just before the war, American investigators could not find evidence that the new buildings were connected to a new nuclear program.

In his personal effort to send nuclear shivers up the American spine, Cheney said, "We now know that Saddam has resumed his efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. Among other sources, we've gotten this from firsthand testimony from defectors, including Saddam's son-in-law."

But the son-in-law, Hussein Kamel, was murdered seven years ago. More insidious is that the testimony he did give, in 1995, Kamel said that Iraq in fact had not resumed any uranium enrichment programs after the 1991 Gulf War.

The administration also made a big leap, saying that Iraq's attempt to acquire high-strength aluminum tubes was for centrifuges to enrich uranium for nukes.

But all that United Nations weapons inspectors and US Energy Department experts could conclude was that the tubes were for conventional rockets. "Gas centrifuge experts consulted by the US government said repeatedly for more than a year that the aluminum tubes were not suitable or intended for uranium enrichment," the Post wrote.

The Bush administration raised the scare level to red in another way, telling Americans that Saddam was having meetings with nuclear scientists. Bush did not tell Americans there was no evidence the three top gas centrifuge experts were running anything other than a copper factory, a graphite extraction plant, and a mechanical engineering design center.

The Post reporters wrote, "The danger of a nuclear-armed Saddam Hussein, more potent as an argument for war, began with weaker evidence and grew weaker still in the three months before the war."

The only nuclear event going on concerning Iraq is a meltdown of the Bush administration.

The death toll of US soldiers is now 257. The death toll of Iraqi soldiers and civilians is in the thousands. No weapons of mass destruction have been found. No nuclear program has been found.

Cheney's claim of a mortal threat continues to grow into a mortal wound for the moral justification for the invasion. Rice continues to say we were right not to wait for Saddam's smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud. She told the conference, "The threat could not be allowed to remain unaddressed."

With no smoking gun of the threat, the plume Americans should be looking for is the one over the White House, growing into the most deadly lie since Vietnam."


5:16:25 AM    comment [] trackback []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2007 Ghost Dansing.
Last update: 10-03-2007; 14:22:20.

August 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Jul   Sep