Updated: 2/15/2006; 7:05:03 AM.

   Hogg's Blog

            David Hoggard's take on local politics and life in general from Greensboro, NC
        

Wednesday, April 28, 2004

Last night I attended the parent meeting at Aycock Middle School  that was to be a "celebration of the decision" to implement a school uniform policy next year according to a flyer that was mailed to all Aycock families.  It was far from a "celebration".  Even though the phone survey that was conducted by Aycock staff and parental proponents of the policy change revealed that 84% of those contacted thought that uniforms were a good idea, most of those folks must have stayed home last night.

Several parents who spoke to the issue were not necessarily opposed to school uniforms - but all were highly critical of the process that was utilized to obtain the 84%.  "Biased", "sell job", "slanted" and "unbalanced" were some of the descriptors used by parents from both sides of the issue to characterize the input and survey process.

The most important statements last night came from an Aycock teacher.  In an impassioned appeal, this teacher gave her (and perhaps other teachers') main reason for supporting mandatory uniforms.

She candidly stated that there is a group of students at Aycock who are overly "defiant" and that teachers are having trouble teaching because of them.  She went on to relate how these student's continued presence was demoralizing the staff and contributing to the high rate (30%) of teacher turnover.  It was her hope that if these student's are saddled with a policy that strictly limits what can be worn at school - they will choose to not attend Aycock.

She makes the best argument yet for school uniforms and I applaud her honesty and guts for saying what needed to be said and she probably will get reprimanded for speaking the unvarnished truth in an open forum.  (GCS administration folks were in attendance)  But, of course, those kids will just become someone else's problem if they flee Aycock so uniforms would solve nothing.  And... if all other Guilford County middle schools who are looking for Aycock to lead the way also adopt a uniform policy... the recalcitrant student would probably go full circle and come back to roost where he/she started.

We are getting closer to an open discussion of the root of the problem that uniforms are supposed to correct.  Disruptive children must be removed from the regular classroom expeditiously.  Until the school system takes a no-nonsense approach to discipline in the classroom teachers and principals will continue to grasp at any rope that is thrown their way - like school uniforms.

Here is the finest treatise I have read on the issue.  From Arizona, it states that uniforms are, "the most over-sold academic fad since New Math"


11:46:56 AM     comments to the above post so far, join in.   Trackbacks

Quotes from the group discussion over at ABC of Guilford County regarding the re-assignment results for the High Point "Choice Plan" lottery:

"I suppose in reality, the Guilford County School Board is proposiing spending $12 million for the net movenment of  50 students?   ...I'm sure this won't go over well with taxpayers throughout the county and in the County Commissioners' budget talks." - William Robertson

"...(The School Board) instilled the idea that they would TRY to accommodate 1st and 2nd choices, therefore, some did not REALLY fill out the application with their 1st choice. I know several who filled out the application, choosing what would be the NEXT best and the most LIKELY to get assigned to." - TFU1337

"... what ever happened to the overcrowding situation at Southwest that had to be addressed with a large number of students leaving Southwest?  Did the Schools magically discover that there wasn’t really an overcrowding situation after all?"  - Carl Alexander

"... Sorry, I'm confused, which means Grier's plan is working." - Pam

This morning's N&R reports that the parents are vowing to keep up their efforts to roll back the High Point "Choice Plan" by working to defeat certain school board incumbents in the upcoming election.  But the article also indicates that the Board of Education is breathing much easier.

A full 33% of eligible students chose not to participate in the lottery and this should be of great concern to the Board of Education.  Does that percentage indicate that one third of eligible families weren't paying attention, or is it an indication of severe dis-enfranchisement?  I can't fathom the former.


8:48:32 AM     comments to the above post so far, join in.   Trackbacks

© Copyright 2006 David Hoggard.
 
April 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Mar   May


Feed the Hogg


==================
==================
--M Y B L O G R O L L--
_________
___________________
_________
LOCAL WEBLOG AGGREGATORS
_________
--LOCAL OFFICIALS--
___________________
_________
_________
___________________
-- LOCAL BLOGS--
______
-- N&R BLOGS--
______
--REGIONAL BLOGS--
______
--NOT FROM THESE PARTS--
_________
___________________
_________
--FUTURE USE--
_________
___________________
_________
--LOCAL MEDIA--
_________
___________________
--LOCAL SITES--
___________________
_________
--LOCAL GOVERNMENT--

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Hogg's Blog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Listed on BlogShares