Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog
Computers, freedom, and anything else that comes to mind.









Subscribe to "Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Tuesday, April 27, 2004
 

The Pepsi bottles for the iTunes promotion have finally appeared in Los Angeles (three days before the promotion ends). I did get one of the caps with a code on it--although it took me six bottles (including ones I bought in Austin) to do it. Supposedly a third of the bottles have codes, so one in six is about right given my luck.
10:33:43 PM    comment ()

Partisan blogging.

When I have posted particularly anti-Bush or partisan views, many people have complained in the comments or by email. Some of the most intelligent comments on my blog have come from conservatives and some of the most stupid from liberals. In order to keep some of the more intelligent conservatives involved in the dialog, I've tried to generally steer clear taking strong stands on the war in Iraq and on the presidential election.

I thought about it and I've decided that this is stupid. I don't want Bush to be re-elected and I think going into Iraq was wrong. I will try to be thoughtful about how I make my assertions, but I'm going to stop pretending that I'm non-partisan. I hope that Republicans or people who do not agree with me will continue to read this blog and disagree openly with me. I have just decided that it's getting too close to the election and there is too much at risk for me to just sit here and act neutral.

By Joichi Ito joi_nospam_@nospam_ito.com. [Joi Ito's Web]

One of the commenters, Justin Jessup, makes a good point:

The rest of the world hardly cares about how US citizens govern themselves. It's US foreign policy that the rest of the world worries about.

Outside of the US it's rather disturbing to discover how vast numbers of people regard American interests as a threat - and I'm not just talking about Bush either.

There seems to be an assumption that Joi speaking against Bush means that he is for the Democrats. I can't speak for Joi personally, but to many other people outside the USA the differences between the two candiates, and the two parties, are seen as minor. Commentators are often critical not of the particular President, but of the way the American system as a whole affects people outside the US that don't get a chance to vote.

If you're inside the US and don't like it, there's always the possibility of leaving, but when you are already outside and the US comes to you, what can be done?

Joi, I hope you'll step up to the plate to bat for those who are outside the US as much as you do for those inside it who see politics as either picking Democrat or Republican.


7:24:08 PM    comment ()

Voices From Najaf.

A battle between American forces and the so-called Mahdi Army of Moktada al-Sadr is being fought near Najaf (noted earlier here). Over the weekend, Najaf's clerics spoke out forcefully against one of those forces: al-Sadr's.

"It's not brave to take refuge in the house or the mosque or the markets and use women and children as human shields," said the Shiite imam Sadr al-Din al-Kubanchi to worshippers. Kubanchi said that Sadr's forces are "people who are trying to cheat you · They want to drag you into battle to be destroyed."

According to The New York Times, the Najaf standoff had "turned into a showdown between the clerics of the city and Mr. Sadr." Times journalists wrote that the city's clerics "know that the hopes of a majority of Shiites of overcoming the long-running domination of Sunni Muslims rest with the success of the Americans' efforts to establish a largely democratic Iraq. They know, as well, that by advocating armed rebellion, Mr. Sadr's forces play into the hands of the violent Iraqi insurgents who seek to drive the United States out and reassert Sunni dominance."

[Hit & Run]

As Raed noted yesterday, Najaf is actually the center of a rival Shi'ite group, so it's not too surprising the clerics there don't like him. The real question is, will the Feds go after al-Sadr so clumsily that his political opponents are forced to fight on his behalf out of self-defense?
6:49:26 PM    comment ()


Secret Service Investigates Artwork. Apparently political cartoons critical of the Bush administration can get you in trouble these days. Last Friday the Secret Service goose stepped over a 15 year old boy's depiction of Bush's head on the end of a stick. The boy's... [About Civil Liberties]

The SS found out about it after the school turned his cartoons over to the police. It's safe to say that nobody at that school will be learning about the First Amendment.
6:33:08 PM    comment ()


I've ended my experiment with Eudora 6.1. It's still just too unstable.
6:28:43 PM    comment ()

There seems to be a big opportunity to build an online marketplace/coordination mechanism for private military forces in Iraq.  They currently suffer from a significant amount of chaos that could and should be alleviated.  It could be built inexpensively using best of breed techniques learned over the last decade building sites for the Web. Here is what they need:
  • A marketplace for operational intelligence information.  The forces on the ground have been developing their own intelligence sources.  They should have an easy way to share it (since mutual protection keeps everyone safe).  A weblog powered system would allow easy posting.  There also may be a way to allow these deployed forces to make some money for their effort.  A simple marketplace mechanism (with a reputation metric) would incentivize further activities.
  • A system for requesting mutual aide from other PMCs and the US military.  This system would also include ongoing sit-reps from hot zones.  Instant messaging and conflict zone specific multi-author weblogs would help here.  Synthetic RSS feeds that combine multiple zone weblogs would keep a PMC manager in direct touch with what is going on.
  • A secure tracking mechanism for PMC employees in country.   This could either be simple or complex.  On the complex side there is lots that can be done with real-time transfer of GPS coordinates (Iridium could help here -- the phones cost less than a days pay for most PMCers and I am fairly sure they include GPS).  This system would make search, rescue, and recovery much easier. 

Many more ideas on this.... [John Robb's Weblog]

While it's a very interesting idea, it wouldn't be simple or cheap to implement. Here's why:

There's a good chance that the Feds would object to the whole idea, and try to shut it down. Even if they don't at first, the policy is likely to change with each new administration. An intelligence-selling site for mercenaries is likely to be controversial, and subject to politically motivated attacks. Remember the fuss about the terrorism futures market?

For this reason the service would need to be located outside the United States, and preferably in a country that doesn't respond to bullying by the U.S. government. What's more, the people working on it would need to be citizens of other countries, as a site located in another country is still vulnerable if the Feds can just throw the owner in jail.

The site would need to be secure against intrusion by anyone, even powerful government agencies with unlimited funds, such as the NSA. There's no way any government is going to pay for intelligence if they can steal it, as might the mercenary companies who are supposed to be buying it. The targets of the intelligence would also try to steal information, in order to see what the mercenaries they're fighting now and to track down leaks in their organizations.

This would be very expensive and difficult (I'm not sure if any private company has ever designed a system with the expectation that it would have to stand up to the NSA), but it would be absolutely necessary. Nobody is going to put valuable intelligence up for sale on a site knowing that it will be stolen by the U.S. government and given away to whatever mercenary company they most favor.

Weblogs (and Internet connections in general) are far too unreliable to trust one's life to in the middle of a battle. A better idea would be some sort of 911-like system, where mercenaries under attack could use a satellite phone to call a dispatcher, who would relay the request to any other mercenaries or regular troops in the vicinity.

Carrying something that allows realtime tracking of your location in a war zone isn't a very good idea, as various Palestinian terrorists have (briefly) learned. A better idea would be for mercenaries to carry personal locator beacons, which are activated only when needed.
9:54:47 AM    comment ()



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Ken Hagler.
Last update: 2/15/2006; 2:01:07 PM.
April 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Mar   May