ZDNet: "Yet the fight goes on, and the momentum seems to be on the side of network neutrality. A full House committee vote on network neutrality language was much closer than the sub-committee vote had been. With cable outfits fighting the underlying bill, there is every chance it will fail of passage, either in the House or the Senate. What is most remarkable to me is that most of the energy on this fight has come from the political left. Some conservative bloggers, like Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit, are on board with network neutrality, but the ground troops all seem to be liberals here. Not Democrats, liberals. The Democratic Party has taken no position on this issue, so far as I know. Instead sites like DailyKos, Eschaton, MyDD (one example here) and (most interesting) Moveon.org have been loudest and longest on this, and their readers have responded by peppering relevant Congressional offices."
Wired: "Intel has waded into the debate over the future of the internet, joining major web companies in supporting legislation that would force internet service providers to treat all traffic equally. AT&T and Verizon Communications, the country's largest internet carriers, have said they would like to explore ways of prioritizing some traffic to ensure delivery, and perhaps charge content providers for such a service. Web companies like Google, eBay and Amazon.com as well as consumer groups have opposed the idea, saying equal treatment of traffic is one of the reasons the internet has been such a success. Intel CEO Paul Otellini signed a letter, dated Tuesday, to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation that supported legislation to 'ensure the internet remains open and neutral.' The other co-signers were the CEOs of Google, eBay, Amazon, Microsoft, Yahoo and IAC/InterActiveCorp."
Category: 2008 Presidential Election
6:45:08 PM
|
|