| |
|
Monday, December 11, 2006
|
|
Political Wire: "Newsweek: 'Sources inside the Hillary Clinton camp who insist on anonymity for fear of being frozen out say it is 99 percent certain she will get into the presidential race early next year. Barack Obama partisans, less afraid of retribution but no less anonymous, say their man is about 80 percent likely' to run. He won't make a final decision until the holidays.' Meanwhile, in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader, Obama sure sounds like he's ready to jump in the race."
"2008 pres"
7:18:47 AM 
|
|
Captain's Quarters: "Obama wants to position himself as a liberal alternative to Hillary Clinton, a prospect that seems rather daunting, given her history. Even more dangerous to Hillary, he embodies a desire across the political spectrum for change -- changing the last name in the White House to something other than Bush or Clinton. His entire approach in both appearances [in New Hampshire] was focused on the need to change the tenor of politics in Washington, finding ways to approach policy in non-ideological ways to get things accomplished."
"2008 pres"
7:07:42 AM
|
|
Here's a story about mercury pollution from power plants from the Denver Post. From the article, "Toxic mercury emissions from Colorado's coal-fired power plants may be two to three times higher than estimates reported to federal environmental regulators, according to new industry data. The data comes from advanced monitoring systems recently installed by Xcel Energy at its Comanche and Pawnee power plants. Public health officials say the new data raises questions about whether Colorado's 12 coal-fired power plants may be emitting higher levels of mercury than thought. 'We're very concerned,' said Pam Milmoe, air/waste coordinator for Boulder County Public Health. 'If these plants are emitting higher levels of mercury, then that certainly gives us pause about the state of the environment in Colorado.' Federal studies estimate about 40 percent of the mercury in the environment comes from power plants. The levels of mercury in the environment here are only traces, but they can be concentrated in the food chain...
"The new emissions data were submitted to the state air-pollution control commission in November. The commission is considering, for the first time, placing limits on the mercury that coal-fired power plants can release. A decision is expected in late January. State environmental regulators say they don't know how much mercury coal-fired power plants are emitting and probably won't know until 2009, when federal regulators are requiring the utility industry to install continuous emission-monitoring systems at coal-burning plants. 'Our knowledge about mercury is evolving - it's not as straightforward as other pollutants,' said Paul Tourangeau, the state health department's air-pollution control division director...
"Xcel voluntarily installed monitors at its Comanche plant near Pueblo this summer and the Pawnee plant near Brush this fall. The monitors found that Comanche was discharging the equivalent of 3.9 pounds of mercury for a set amount of heat produced from coal and that Pawnee was emitting 9.9 pounds. In reports to the federal Environmental Protection Agency, Xcel had estimated Comanche emitted 2.7 pounds and Pawnee 3.5 pounds. Gary Magno, Xcel's principal environmental analyst, said utility officials have a great deal of confidence in the new monitoring systems but that the data is varying plant to plant. At the Comanche plant, the new monitors show mercury emissions are actually lower than stack tests - another way to measure emissions. The new monitors at the Pawnee plant show mercury is higher than stack-test data."
"2008 pres"
7:03:28 AM
|
|
Here's a story about the politics around climate change from the Rocky Mountain News. They write, "A federal climate scientist in Boulder says his boss told him never to utter the word Kyoto and tried to bar him from using the phrase climate change at a conference. The allegations come as federal investigators probe whether Bush administration officials tried to block government scientists from speaking freely about global warming and attempted to censor their research...
"Last month, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., announced that inspectors general from NASA and the Commerce Department - NOAA's parent agency - had launched "coordinated, sweeping investigations of the Bush administration's censorship and suppression" of federal research into global warming. Auditors from the inspector general's office at Commerce have been interviewing NOAA employees, agency spokesman Jordan St. John said Thursday. At the same time the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, is conducting a separate review, St. John said...
"Tans stressed that no one has ever tried to alter or suppress his research results. But besides the use of the word Kyoto, there was a second incident with [David Hofmann], he said. It occurred in late 2005, while Tans was organizing the Seventh International Carbon Dioxide Conference in Broomfield. Hofmann called Tans into his office before the September conference and told him the words climate change could not appear in the titles of any of the presentations, Tans said. The incident was reported by The Washington Post in April. Carbon dioxide is produced by the combustion of fossil fuels and has been linked to human-caused climate change. Hofmann said Tans misinterpreted what he said. The words climate change were not barred from presentation titles, Hofmann said. But the focus of the conference was global carbon dioxide measurements, not climate change."
"2008 pres"
6:49:34 AM
|
|
What chemicals are used to frac oil and gas wells? The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, headquartered in Paonia, is trying to answer that question, according to the Rocky Mountain News. From the article, "She [Theo Colborn] and other researchers at the Paonia-based, nonprofit Endocrine Disruption Exchange are poring over scientific journals and scrambling to identify the chemicals used by energy companies to determine if there's a link between natural gas operations and area residents' health complaints. Energy industry officials say they are closely regulated and that much of the information about the chemicals they use is public by law. They also say some of the work they do is so far below the surface that it's unlikely it could affect people, and they question why energy workers aren't reporting the same problems...
"Now, she's focused on the oil and gas industry. Colborn said using industry Material Safety Data Sheets, kept at work sites, and information from industry insiders, she and her fellow researchers have identified nearly 220 chemicals used in energy development, some of which she said are known to cause respiratory and neurological problems and gastrointestinal and liver damage. 'It says on the (Material Safety Data Sheets) you should wear a respirator and goggles' around the chemicals, Colborn said. 'And people are living near these sites.' Colborn believes the numerous wastewater pits dotting the rolling hills in Garfield County, heart of northwestern Colorado's energy boom, are a health hazard. But she acknowledges that proving that could be difficult. One of the problems is that many of the chemicals haven't been thoroughly tested and no health standards have been established for them, Colborn said. 'And they've not been looked at for long-term health effects,' she added. Colborn said another challenge is that companies frequently won't reveal their recipes for hydraulic fracturing, which injects water, sand and chemicals underground to break down barriers and help release oil or gas for extraction."
"colorado water"
6:38:22 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2009 John Orr.
Last update: 3/15/09; 12:17:34 PM.
|
|
|
