101 - 365 (baby!)
a blog of truth and beauty
        

Home
Index
About
Gallery

p e r i o d i c
Buy Images!

The 'Hood
jenett.radio.randomizer - click to visit a random Radio weblog - for information, contact randomizer@coolstop.com

Art

Science

Computer

Tools

Auf Deutsch

Celebrity

Discussion

Personal

Moved On...

Other Chris Heilmen

Listed on
BlogShares
Google: chris 101
<# phx blogs ?>
Hot or not?
Hire me!
Geo
jenett.radio.randomizer - click to visit a random Radio weblog - for information, contact randomizer@coolstop.com


May 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Apr   Jun

Click to see the XML version of this web page. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Wednesday, May 14, 2003

What is real?

Has the ease of digital manipulation made it impossible to tell if a photograph is real? What's ok, and what's fakery? Are photographs records or pretty pictures?

I often use histogram manipulation (Layers, Curves, Color Balance, etc.) but I did on film too, in a much more cumbersome manner, with Multigrade paper, and variable contrast filters, and many, many less than perfect prints. Other Photoshop techniques are analogous to darkroom manipulations: dodging, burning, cropping, tinting, saturation adjustment. unsharp masking and area masking.

(Here's a Hoover Dam panorama.)

Oh yeah, panoramas and collage! The process of taping photos together is also easier digitally than by hand. They look better too, but once again, are they real?

As long as manipulations do not alter the intent of the image, they are legitimate pictorial techniques. The process of making an image need not lie entirely within the machine that we make them with, but rather it should be a cooperation of our imagination and that machine. Be cautious when using extreme digital manipulations to make pretty pictures though - they can be mistaken for real images.


comments

© Copyright 2003 by Chris Heilman.