Critics question iTunes/iPod longevity [The Macintosh News Network]
This is so misguided... They've been saying the same things for over a year, will they ever realize their mistake? First of all, Apple did license its technology... to Microsoft! And that is exactly how it failed! Second, Microsoft is king because of business PCs, those do not count in this equation! The consumer is king and Apple is big with the consumer. And it will keep growing. The Windows based music stores are ignoring a big chunk of users that can't use them, plus they have no differentiation whatsoever! When they really start competing, people will realize that if they get into Napster-to-go a 15$ a month, they can't change later to MSN-Music-on-the-road for 10$ without losing (or, worse, keep paying!) their previous investment. If they have to redownload the music they want, will they be happy? Finally, we'll start hearing the stories of the guys that went on a trip and didn't reconnect, so they had to go music less for the rest of their trip. You rent things that you don't want to keep forever... Music, you want to keep, because you want to listen to in 20 years. That will cost you 3600$ in Napster. If Napster still exist then... I bet people will see the difference in value between the two propositions. Movies you rent and watch once in a big screen, Music you own and play over and over everywhere (including in a CD in a car. Can't do that with Napster).
9:21:11 PM
|
|