Ernie the Attorney : searching for truth & justice (in an unjust world)
Updated: 6/5/2003; 10:44:19 PM.

 



















Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 

Wednesday, June 26, 2002

US Pledge of Allegiance Ruled Unconstitutional

"Millions of American schoolchildren --- including almost all adults who grew up in the US --- have for two generations recited a daily pledge of allegiance in schools. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today ruled that pledge to be a violation of the US Constitution. Social conservatives are outraged, liberals are smirking, and many of us are just stunned."  [kuro5hin.org]

It is sort of stunning, but a couple of things to note.  First, it was a 2-1 decision and I'm sure there will be en banc review (that means a review by the entire group of judges that compose the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals).  I don't know enough about the Ninth Circuit to hazard a guess as to how that review will turn out, but it will take awhile for en banc review to occur.  So let's not get too worked up yet.

Oh, and not that it matters, but the words "under God" were not always in the Pledge of Allegiance.  They were added in a 1954 federal law.  After reading the opinion quickly, I agree with the dissenting judge (Judge Fernandez) that the religious effect of those words is minimal and doesn't impinge on the citizenry's "free exercise" of religion.  But I'm sure, given that this sort of case is a real hot-button decision, we'll all be getting worked up based on our feelings about religion, rather than based on sound constitutional legal principles.  The issue presented in this case is a pure legal question, not a moral/social question.  And that is the way it should be, but you can be sure that the mainstream medial won't portray it that way.

I'll have more to say when I read the decision closely, which I'll have to do later...
5:52:09 PM    


Thought for the day...

Soren Kierkegaard. "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." [Quotes of the Day]



1:42:45 PM    


Swamp Beaver Law

Denise writes "You can learn all kinds of things keeping up with U.S. appellate decisions. Like the fact they make coats out of nutria (don't tell Baby). (Industrias Magromer Cueros y Pieles S.A. v. Louisiana Bayou Furs Inc., via FindLaw)" via  [Bag and Baggage]

I don't know if it is discussed in the opinion, but Nutria are good to eat too.  I don't believe I've ever had it blackened, though.
1:41:31 PM    


cnet: Lawmaker: Let studios hack P2P networks

"A proposed US law would allow copyright holders to attack peer-to-peer networks in order to prevent infringement. The bill, which is still being drafted, would provide a shield against legal liability for copyright owners who used high-tech attacks to stop file trading. It would stop short of giving them the right to damage file-swappers' computers or spread viruses..." [Story Link] via  [zem]

The Content Kings are like Moths.  They keep flying into what they see as light.  Hopefully, it will deliver a lethal electrical charge...
1:39:18 PM    


© Copyright 2003 Ernest Svenson.

Comments by: YACCS



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

 


June 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
May   Jul

My BlogRoll
wedgeGeneral Blogs
wedgeThe Sharks ("warbloggers")
Louisiana Law

Search This Site




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.


Listed on BlogShares