It is a pity that Powell wasn't quite so honest about the "proofs"
leading the US into the bloody mess in the first place. Bush is so
certain of what he wants to believe, and so wrong in his facts.
Our half-million dollar vehicles and the priceless young soldiers are dying to baling-wire and brown-paper devices.
Some of the most powerful IEDs we are seeing in Iraq today includes
components that came from Iran. Our director of National Intelligence,
John Negroponte, told the Congress Tehran has been responsible for at
least some of the increasing lethality of anti- coalition attacks by
providing Shi'a militia with the capabilities to build improvised
explosive devices in Iraq. Coalition forces have seized IEDs and
components that were clearly produced in Iran.
From Reuters article from Tuesday: "US General Says No Proof Iran Behind Iraq Arms" (Via AmericaBlog.)
President George W. Bush said on Monday components from Iran were
being used in powerful roadside bombs used in Iraq, and Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week that Iranian Revolutionary
Guard personnel had been inside Iraq.
Asked whether the United States has proof that Iran's government
was behind these developments, Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace, chairman
of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Pentagon briefing, "I
do not, sir."
How many times did they/he say
Weapons of Mass Destruction before Iraq? Why should anyone trust
them/him now? They could say the world is flat and 35% of Americans
would believe them without question.
So if a soldier detects an IED I would think they would blow it up
from a safe distance instead of taking it apart and figuring out how it
works. And even if they took it apart and found an Irananian mortor
inside that wouldn't really prove that Iran was involved... It could be
that they found one IED from Iran. Really the thing is that Bush isn't
a believable person. He exagerates and misrepresents and sometimes he
doesn't even understand the issues clearly to begin with. He may want
to stir up a conflict with Iran before the mid-term elections.
"John Negroponte, told the Congress Tehran has been responsible for
at least some of the increasing lethality of anti- coalition attacks" "Today nearly half the IEDs in Iraq are found and disabled before
they can be detonated. In the past 18 months, we've cut the casualty
rate per IED attack in half." So either the attacks are more lethal or half as lethal depend on which parts of the speech you want to believe...
The
US war with Iran was actually started by the US in the 1950s when it overthrew a
popularily elected and democratic governement in Iran, and installing
the brutal and repessive Shah. When the Iranian popular revolution
happened, the US took the Shah in and refused to hand him over. Its a
bit as if Russia had offered Hitler refuge at the end of WWI. Only then
did the Iranians take hostages. The war by the US on Iran was continued
throughout the Iran-Iraq war when it supported Saddam Hussein,
supplying him with cluster bombs, chemical weapons, and satelite
photography.
Iran was one of the cradles of civilisation, and thousands of years
before the first verstiges of european civilation, King Cyrus of Persia
was declaring that "all men are created equal". Every nation choses or makes its enemies. If there is enimnity, one
has to ask where it comes from, and to take some measure of
responsibility for it.