Updated: 02/06/2003; 6:45:35 AM.
Robert Paterson's Radio Weblog
What is really going on beneath the surface? What is the nature of the bifurcation that is unfolding? That's what interests me.
        

Thursday, May 22, 2003

RELATIONSHIPS & COMPROMISE.
relationships The latest infectious meme in the blogosphere, which suggests that perhaps the best relationships require no compromise at all, started when one blogger innocently observed that a prime example of how compromise works in marriage is the process of deciding "which movie shall we see". Before you go see what others have to say on this subject, think about where you stand on this spectrum:
  1. The best relationships require and achieve compromise on all things, big and small.
  2. The best relationships let you compromise on small unimportant things, but quickly achieve shared consensus on things that matter.
  3. Compromise depends on the nature of the relationship. In a romantic relationship compromise is necessary, but in friendships it isn't.
  4. The best relationships require honesty, and too much compromise is dishonest and leads to chronic unhappiness in the relationship. Generally, women know where to draw the line better than men, and end a relationship that compromises too much.
  5. The best relationships require no compromise at all. Life is too short and precious to sacrifice what you really want for one relationship.

Decided where you stand? Now how about business relationships -- is your position different? OK, now you can start with Caterina 's post and follow the thread. I'm going to shut up for a change and listen to what others have to say before I add my two cents.

AN ASIDE ON SIDELINKS BARS
Caterina has also started a "sidelinks" bar, a list of links to interesting issues or subjects , with no or minimal commentary. I think it's a worthwhile idea, but I can't help thinking that if we agreed upon some principles for these, they'd be more useful and we could even get blogmakers to build them into the tools. Take a look at Caterina's (see link above) and those of two 'A-list' bloggers she refers to that I haven't mentioned before: Anil Dash and Jason Kottke . What do you think? What should they be called? Should they have no commentary or a teaser? What's the ideal number? Look for mine, in the right column that has more room, shortly. I'm thinking of calling it incubating memes.

[How to Save the World]

H Dave - How do you do it - keep all this good stuff going. I am demoing Radio to a friend and chose your post to show how to make the connection.


3:20:05 PM    comment []

This is a test for my friend Marie
3:17:18 PM    comment []

Philosophy of Matrix Reloaded.

Salon.com Books | The Matrix way of knowledge

The Matrix way of knowledge From the Gnostic gospels to the visions of Descartes to the shamanic quests of Eastern mystics, the Wachowski brothers' pop opus weaves a dense web of philosophical and metaphysical allusions. - - - - - - - - - - - - By Erik Davis

The author seems to like going along for the ride, and is far from a raving fan of the movie. But he does a good job of picking up on a few of the key themes (pardon the pun) that are central to the film.

Most importantly, he digs in on something that several (including me) have talked about: that the matrix in Matrix Reloaded is far less structured and far more ambiguous than we'd been led to believe in the first Matrix.

I was talking to Ernie yesterday about my iPod, and we both laughed about the wildly divergent reactions we had to Matrix Reloaded. The main reason I feel comfortable enjoying the film - incomplete though it is - is that I'm confident that once Matrix Revolutions rolls around, it will radically change what we think we know about Reloaded (in much the same way Reloaded changed what we thought about the first film). If I'm right - and we'll only know come November - then Reloaded will prove to be a deeper and more intricate piece of work than is apparent right now.

And that would end up being the same reason I appreciated the first so much - like a kaleidoscope, each viewing changed what I saw and how I saw it. That's an exceedingly rare trait in film today - and is one of the reasons I'm so optimistic about the trilogy.

[tins ::: Rick Klau's weblog]

Lots of good stuff in these links. A few words of my own. Quick first step I liked the film a lot but a few gripes. The action scenes are now like American porn - the same old thing done too long. Not enough foreplay and tension to make it interesting. What am I talking about - recall Reservoir Dogs or the opening scene or the scene in Private Ryan in the bell tower and the fight with the bayonet - that is compelling action.

Some of my take aways. The architect now knows that the search for perfection = guaranteed failure. Well or not he is trying to design in not only failure but rebellion. In our organizations we seek the earlier models of perfection. What if we allowed for failure and rebellion - would our organization become more human?

The scene with the councillor and Neo when they go down to the machine room. Who is in charge the machines or man? Neo remarks that we can always turn off the machines - the machines that give us life retorts the councillor who then laughs. We and our machines are interdependent. To give them up is to give up our way of life. Ray Kurzweil thinks that we and our machines will become one.

I loved the scene with Smith and Neo before they fight - which I found silly. I got the sense that Smith knows more than any of the participants. In the trailer we see a rematch between Neo and Smith. Can either really "kill" the other. I wonder may some form of integration be on the cards. Is not your best enemy your best teacher? Is he not yourself???

 


1:47:02 PM    comment []

Value in Aggregate.

Clay Shirky's latest newsletter, on Grid Supercomputing: The Next Push, devalues computation relative to communication and questions the value proposition of grid computing.  He makes some great point, but I think he is right about relative value, albeit the irony that grid computing is enabled by communication. 

When I think of grids, I think of bell curves.  MIPS, Mbs & Mbps have become fungible datacommodities.  Grid computing provides means of aggregation.  When aggregated you pool risk.

Your average company utilizes datacommodities in a bell curve that maps to the duration of a day, with a peak utilization a little before noon.  This bell curve follows the sun in a daily cycle.  A company in California has a different demand curve than one in NY, creating an potential overlap in preferences.  Grid computing allows those preferences and risks to be pooled, flattening the curve in aggregate.  The key to making it work is the transaction costs of shifting granular supply from one place to another, billing for it and managing its performance.  Virtualization technologies in grid computing and data centers are advancing to make these otherwise smart services dumb.

Californians became intimately acquainted with the danger of bursts at the peak, falsified or not, in the electricity market.  Here is an example of how pricing is differentiated for load aggregation according to base, peak, off-peak and burst:

Sure processing is relatively inexpensive and has Moore's Law on its side.  Grid computing isnt for individuals.  When costs are added up for a large organization, hosting farm or major project they are significant.  Pooling costs and risks in the aggregate has its benefits.

IBM's marketing whizes have it right in promoting the on-demand potential of grids.  Nothing panics decision makers more than the risk of not having enough capacity available at a key unforseen moment.  They will pay a premium for capacity on demand or as an insurance policy.

[Ross Mayfield's Weblog]

Shame on you Ross - you said that you were going to be "toddling" today. But as always you have another zinger.

Is the shift to inventory pricing in airlines the same type of idea. Air Canada's bankruptcy workout is based on a shift from "behavioural pricing" where we as the customer has tp keep within certian behaviours set by the airline ie  to book ahead, stay over weekends, two way etc to pricing based on real inventory in real time. Is not Google Ads the same as well where you get what you pay for?


1:25:23 PM    comment []

Finding Information in Blogosphere.

Tom Coates applies Duncan Watt's Small Worlds ideas to blogs and states: "For any given body of information on weblogs, no matter the rate of replication of information or the number of people who post exactly the same comments, close to 100% of the available insight can be reviewed by reading a disproportionately small number of sites - sites that will - as a rule - be among the first that they stumble across through their normal browsing and research patterns."

[E M E R G I C . o r g]

It seems that in a well connected network, information will get around without the need that every single weblog must be read. Redundancy of information and overlapping spheres of interest will make it work. I think what is more critical is the spread of memes and the development of a tipping point that causes a phase shift in viewpoint. An example may be the NYT archives thread in the blogosphere. This was first discussed over a month ago. Then we recently got a second wave of interest, with a wider dispersal and more forceful presentation of ideas and viewpoints. I expect the next one will be even stronger. The resonance just gets stronger and stronger, like Jimi Hendrix guitar feedback, until things shift. Weblogs are not passive and the ideas they present are not either. It is the interactions of many weblogs that disperse information until knowledge in created. I think too many people view weblogging as a passive event. I put up my ideas and they kind of lay there. But, it the ideas are worthwhile, the get picked up and examined by others. Molded and stamped with their views and then passed on. It is this dynamic process that many people miss. It is what makes weblogs so unique and so powerful. [A Man with a Ph.D. - Richard Gayle's Weblog]

Yes Richard - the thin threads start to thicken up and become rope and able to pull down big statues


12:11:59 PM    comment []

What is the essence of relationships in Hunter Gatherer society? What lesson can we take from this and apply to our own relationships - to friends, to spouses and to our children.

At the heart of all our modern relationships is the need for control. Our school system is all about control. Institutional life is all about control. We seek to reform our wives and husbands. Our friends and children become improvement projects. We seek to control our own lives.Why - because the idea of property and hence the fear of its loss is our driver.

The most important piece of property that we hang onto is our life itself. The Western ideal is to cure death itself. None of this fear of the loss of property and hence control applies to a hunter gatherer. The HG has no property. A reason I believe why the native Americans were so bemused by the white man's need to negotiate treaties for land. Who could conceive of owning land in a Hunter Gatherer society. You would have hunting grounds that you would defend but you did not own and hence control the land itself. How could you, as a HG, imagine that you could control nature?

Security is still an issue but the HG finds security through working smartly with nature and relies on the collective wisdom of the group, or tribe, to tackle this difficult task. In this context then, the essence of the HG worldview is the need to develop the types of wisdom and personal value that will contribute to the survival of the group or tribe. They accept that the world out there is more powerful than they are. They know that they cannot control it - that they can only "access" it. To access its bounty, they have to understand it. To understand it they have to understand themselves and they have to be in harmony with the group so that its collective wisdom can be tapped in a timely way. So personal growth  and trusted connection to the group and so to its collective wisdom is the core survival process. They depend on the community for their security up to a point but not on any individual. They take charge therefore of their own lives. Their purpose is not the illusion of happiness but of growth and integration. Power in the group comes then not from the application of force but comes to those that are the most spiritually developed and the most integrated.

Facilitation is a core skill. You act as a spiritual midwife to the growth of those in relationship with you and they return the favour.

So in this world, your spouse is your key partner is developing your self and him/her. Your job as parents is to ensure that your children have the range of experience that will set them on their course for the maximum development and hence the security of the tribe. The entire tribe participates in the raising of all the children. Your friends are part of the social and economic unit, the tribe, that gives you all the best chance of coping with a dangerous and uncertain world. Knowing that life is fragile, death has not the fear for the HG as it does for us. So paradoxically they enjoy life more. This lack of fear is not rooted in a belief but in their observation. Being students of nature, they can "see" that life does not end irrevocably but is transformed within a great cycle of death and renewal. 

So how can this knowledge help us?

Since the dawn of agriculture and settled living, we have lived in a growing illusion that we can succeed in controlling the world around us. Even our new Gods have set us apart and in control over nature. For us, controlling nature is our Destiny. In small areas we applied technology and it looked as if we would conquer nature. Today we are seeing the cracks. Disease such as AIDS and SARS. Breakdown in the food system - mad cow. Weather anomalies. In our institutions we spin the wheels harder and harder but we accomplish less and less. Many loyal and hard working employees are getting laid off and cannot see why their deal with the company has failed. Most families today are one parent. Marriage is failing as a concept that we can live with. More than 30% of our children are failing in school. Many have to be drugged to stay in school.  Addiction to things, to sugar and to escape is rising. Look at what we are watching on TV now!!!! Health care cost, especially drug use are out of control.

The illusion of our being able to use technology to control our world is cracking.

Controlling what cannot be controlled is exhausting - Hunter Gatherers show us that there is a societal model that we can apply again which at its heart is built on one idea which we can replicate. That one idea is that we cannot control others, or the world. There is only one person that we can control and that is ourself. In this world of accepted uncertainly comes a new security. This security is based on the power of a group to solve complex problems and to understand the world so that they can cope with it.

Our security come with earning a place in such a group. In tribal life there are no handouts.

Such an idea does not require us to wear skins and go back to hunting in the classic sense just as the ideas of the greeks and the Romans did not require men in the 14th century to put on togas. Many of us are starting to accept that we cannot control others or the world. Many of us are already earning our place in social and economic tribes. Web-logging itself is I think an important agent in this process. Many of us are now self-employed in an new way and if we look carefully are in fact "hunting and gathering". The world of the Hunter Gatherer - the world of wild and not domesticated humans - our home for 4 million years is I think re- emerging from a 7,000 year experiment with domestication where the HG thought he was domesticating plants and animals but ended up domesticating himself!

For me, this book written in public is a voyage of discovery - I have some ideas already but they will become clear to me and to you as I write more. It would be fun to have you along for the voyage.

I have an old map found after 15 years of reading. Here is where I intend to go. I will look at work itself and how the economy in HG terms could be adapted to our circumstances. Inside this part we will look at the ideas of the Gift and of a world view of Abundance. We will see how the Hunter Mindset fits the emerging world of the Free Agent Nation. We will look at how HG groups governed themselves. We will look at their relationship to food, water and the spirit. We will see how they dealt with the issues of health and education and how they used the power of the community to have the most important impact on both. We will look at art as a functional world of participants rather than voyeurs. We will examine the world of the spirit and how the HG made the connections to the universe and to the natural world and integrated this into his being. We will look at how gender operated as two distinct worlds that came together as opposites to offer the power of the whole. We will see the difference between property and place. Place being the intensely understood piece of land where all was known about and where the soul resided for all time. We will look at the needs for us to fit into not only place but into a social scale that enables and supports community and growth (Magic Numbers) We will reconsider time and discover once again the access points to dream or non linear time. We will look at the stages of life, their gateways from child to youth to man to sage, We will look at death and finally we will look at purpose and how Hunter Gathers find meaning in their lives.

Welcome to this journey


12:06:12 PM    comment []

The link takes you to the course outline that I am teaching online for the next 6 weeks. I plan to post some of my responses to my students questions and some of their ideas as a periodic series..

The course looks deeply into why our machine model for organization has become the problem today and how the application of natural models is overwhelming the machine.


10:17:01 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2003 Robert Paterson.
 
May 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Apr   Jun


Blogroll


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Robert Paterson's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.