e-Lawg : A Canadian Perspective on Intersections of Law and Technology
Updated: 18/02/2005; 11:34:59 PM.

 

Michael Girard's e-Lawg

  CACounsel

  Girard Law Office

Categories

Subscribe to "e-Lawg" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Listed on BlogsCanada

 
 

March 25, 2004

The Canadian Privacy Commissioner has held that a bank employee should not have asked for two pieces of identification and further personal information after a client had presented a valid driver's licence.  There was sufficient personal information on the driver's licence for the bank's purposes. 

Principle 4.3.3 of Schedule 1 of the Act stipulates that an organization shall not, as a condition of the supply of a product or service, require an individual to consent to the collection, use, or disclosure of information beyond that required to fulfil the explicitly specified and legitimate purposes.

The request for further information was in breach of the Act.


8:58:52 PM    comment []  trackback []  

The Canadian Privacy Commissioner held that a bank's promotional practice of opening an account and issuing unrequested credit cards to a client were not good privacy practices.  These went beyond the purpose of advertising and offering additional products, services and other solicitations that might be of interest to the customer (for which there had been consent).
8:51:03 PM    comment []  trackback []  

The Canadian Bar Association has called upon the Federal Government to adopt an advisory committee to make recommendations on Supreme Court judicial appointments to the Prime Minister. 

The Association says the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court of Canada "must adhere to the principles of judicial independence, openness and merit, and must not follow the path toward U.S.-style congressional hearings."

CBA President William Johnson, Q.C. of Regina said: “The CBA is strongly opposed to any system which would expose judges to Parliamentary criticism of their judgments, or cross-examination on their beliefs or preferences or judicial opinions, or any measure which would give to Canadians the mistaken impression that the judicial branch answers to the legislative branch,”.

This issue is under urgent consideration due to the imminent departure of two Supreme Court Justices.

 


8:43:05 PM    comment []  trackback []  


© Copyright 2005 Michael Girard.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


Shoot the Stars

March 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Nov   Apr


Search e-Lawg
Search Web

Canadian Courts
Courts of Appeal
Firms
Blawgs