Craig Cline's Blog

April 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Mar   May


 Wednesday, April 09, 2003

Every now and then I check my Referers Log and see who's linking to me. many blogs I come across seem to spend a fair amount of their time linking to other blogs. Mine is much more about the issues that concern me, although I'm always gratified to discover that someone is reading my blog. today I discovered that I was being linked to by Technorati Link Cosmos

Check it out!
3:35:52 PM    

Paul Krugman's column in yesterday's New York Times, The Last Refuge, addresses a point that has been nagging at me.  The Republican's in Congress, as is its wont, is attempting to make any protest against the war or the Bush administration's conduct of same to be viewed as equivlaent to an "act of treason."

The incident he cites is as folows:

Last week John Kerry told an audience that "what we need now is not just a regime change in Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but we need a regime change in the United States." Republicans immediately sought to portray this remark as little short of treason. "Senator Kerry crossed a grave line when he dared to suggest the replacement of America's commander in chief at a time when America is at war," declared Marc Racicot, chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Krugman concludes by observing that if we are entering a period of semi-permanent war, will Republican's argue that debate aboutt he war or circiticsm of the president will always be viewed as treasonous?  He observed that even at the height of the fighting during the second World War a lively and critical election camapign was fought with no attempt by either side to withhold or stifle criticsm of the President or his adminsitration.

Krugman concludes:

For years to come, then, this country may be, in some sense, at war. And all that time, if Mr. Racicot and his party are allowed to set the ground rules, nobody will be allowed to criticize the president or call for his electoral defeat. You know what? If that happens, we will have lost the war, whatever happens on the battlefield.

It won't surprise me to see the next election be fought on the basis of a given candidate's expressed patriotism rather than the issues that should matter - like the economy, the validtiy of preemptive War, the crises in medical insurance, etc.  Assuming we will be allowed by the goverment to hold an election at all.....


2:45:23 PM    

Interesting story in today's NYT from Reuters:

Arabs Watch Hussein's Demise in Disbelief


Associated Press
Mohammed Deyazadah, in his shop in Gaza City, watched a U.S. Army officer being interviewed in Iraq by Al Jazeera today.

By REUTERS

Filed at 1:11 p.m. ET

CAIRO (Reuters) - Arabs watched in disbelief on Wednesday as Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, described by one Moroccan as the Arab world's ``best dictator,'' lost Baghdad to U.S.-led forces without a fight.

``It's like a movie. I can't believe what I'm seeing,'' said Adel, a lawyer in Beirut. ``Why didn't he just give up to start with if this was all the resistance he could muster? Instead of wasting all those lives for nothing.''In Cairo, people gathered around television sets in shops and coffee houses watching U.S. troops toppling a huge statue of Saddam in the heart of Baghdad and Iraqis dancing on it.

``It seemed that Iraqis were all with Saddam, now it looks like many didn't like him. Maybe those destroying the statue are rebels against Saddam's rule,'' engineer Magdy Tawfiq said as he watched Saddam's statue being toppled by a U.S. tank.

But security guard Waleed Tawfiq said he still did not believe Saddam was out. ``I will be upset if it turns out Saddam has lost power. He tried to defend his land. If he is dead he will be a martyr.''

Most Arabs have no love for Saddam. But his defiance toward the United States has been met with approval in a region angry at Washington's support for Israel and perceived interference in Arab affairs, and the presence of U.S. forces in Arab countries.

Three weeks of war in Iraq have sparked anger across the Arab world, and the anger grew as civilian casualties mounted. Protesters at hundreds of rallies have chanted praise for ``beloved'' Saddam and held his picture aloft.

Rabat perfume shop owner Lahoucine Lanait described Saddam as the Arab world's ``best dictator.''

But few Arabs had a kind word for him as his 24-year rule collapsed on Wednesday.

``Saddam is not an Arab champion. The war is practically over, did he win? No, and Iraq is destroyed,'' said Ayman Abdel Rahim, a Cairo butcher.

``Saddam Hussein is proving for the thousandth time that he is stubborn, stupid, idiotic and a terrorist. He is more like the head of a gang and not the president of a respectable state like Iraq,'' said Sultan Nasser, 49-year-old Saudi bank employee.

STANDING UP TO THE UNITED STATES

Many Arabs liken the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq to Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

In Oman, some said Saddam, whose fate is unknown after he was targeted by U.S. planes, symbolized resistance.

``It is irrelevant whether Saddam is dead or not. His memory will live on to inspire many Arabs to stand up against all the injustices committed by the U.S. and its friends in Israel,'' Belqees Hamood, a university student, said.

``Saddam was not an angel to his own people but he will be missed since many Arabs see him as a leader who was not afraid to challenge the American and Israeli aggressions over Palestinians,'' said Juma Backer, a businessman.

In Saudi Arabia, Mohsen al-Awajy, a reformist sheik who has been jailed by the country's pro-Western monarchy, said: ``No one wanted to fight under Saddam's banner.''

``But resistance to occupation has nothing to do with Saddam and just part of the battle is about to end now.''

Adel in Beirut disagreed. ``So he was the only Arab leader to stand up to the Americans. Look what happened, no one else will dare try that again.''

Some said his death at the hands of U.S.-led invaders would make him a martyr. It was a question of honor.

``My hope is that Saddam falls fighting with his own gun. If he flees or surrenders, as many people believe, then he is like other Arab leaders who do not care about honor, it would be a total shame,'' said Sellami Hidoussi, a Tunis car garage guard.

Fahd Saleh of Saudi Arabia expressed equal dislike for President Bush and Saddam.

``Saddam is a terrorist but he's not alone. Bush too is a terrorist but Saddam is weak and Bush is strong. That's why he has won, because no one opposes a strong person,'' said the 33-year-old Saudi government employee.

``How wonderful the world would be without Saddam and without Bush!''

Copyright 2003 by the New York Times, Reuters

---------------------------------

``How wonderful the world would be without Saddam and without Bush!'' - indeed!  I think this is the prevailing viewpoint that most of the world holds.....


 


2:34:21 PM    

With any luck this is the Baghdad webcam link from the BBC: The BBC reports that Baghdad has fallen, but I bet its going to be a long long time before there is true peace in that city, if ever.

CENTRAL BAGHDAD


10:47:32 AM    

From "fortysixandtwo's" Blog,  who has been kind enough to be the very first dude to link to me, had a link to Saddam's Blog!!! on his blog today.  Funny!


10:36:54 AM    

Two items from today's Good Mornning Silicon Valley, one of the more useful and entertaining email newsletters I receive,  from the SiliconValley.com :

Buffer overflow vulnerability discovered in IT security leadership: Former presidential cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke warned lawmakers Tuesday that the newly created Department of Homeland Security is ill-equipped to handle the challenges it is sure to encounter. Testifying before a House Government Reform subcommittee, Clarke called upon the government to create a national cybersecurity center staffed by top computer-security experts and a federal chief information security officer with authority over all federal agencies, adding that the Office of Management and Budget's efforts to do this have so far fallen short. "I would hope that with cybersecurity we can do more to raise our defenses before we have a major disaster," Clarke said. "The problems we've had to date are minor compared to the potential."

Intel, Fujitsu, Proxim and Nokia are among the members of the WiMax Forum, a non-profit alliance established in support of 802.16, a wireless metropolitan area network technology that provides up to 30 miles of range and offers users broadband connectivity even if they don't have a direct line of sight with the base station. "WiMAX has stepped forward to help solve barriers to adoption, such as interoperability and cost of deployment. WiMAX will use the same approach that the Wi-Fi Alliance used to help ignite the wireless LAN industry, by defining and conducting interoperability testing and labeling vendor systems with a "WiMAX Certified" label once testing has been completed successfully," said Roger Marks, the IEEE 802.16 chairman, in a statement. 

WiMax is a very exciting development, since it presages a time when loosely connected wireless networks create a seamless grid for wireless access within cities and communities, thereby cutting the heart out of the wireless data monopoly that 3G and other telecon driven standards promise at a fraction of the speed and an order of magnitude greater cost.


10:14:32 AM