| |
|
Friday, November 4, 2005
|
|
and nobody came?
Bolivia:
Leasing the Rain
Available for viewing online. Privatization sparks a deadly
protest in the town of Cochabamba when the Bolivian government sells
off its water system to a private, multi-national consortium Aguas del
Tunari. New Yorker writer William Finnegan travels to
Cochabamba to learn why people took to the streets and what happens
next. (more)
[ FRONTLINE/World
- Reports | PBS]
10:11:09 PM
|
|
and there is letting them lead us to where we discover for ourselves.
(highly recommended)
So
Many Digital Divides to Bridge, So Little Time (and Resources and Money
and Staff and....)
Digital
Divide Multiplied
"One thing that did
occur to me yesterday, that I think is important, is the nature of our
digital divide. There are lots of digital divides, each with its own
seeds for danger. What I was thinking about was the digital divide
between tech-savvy students and students with little or no access to
networked digital information outside the classroom -- and to some
extent, the digital divide between tech-savvy students and less-savvy
teachers.
The literacy divide of the 20th century distinguished between people
who could functionally read and those who could not. Democracy was
certainly at stake, but to no small degree, so was commerce. The
literate could consume the messages of content producers.
Today, the divide has multiplied, because people with contemporary
(digital/21st century) literacy skills not only consume content, but
they are the content. Being literate means being part of the network.
The difference is not merely the individual who can read and individual
who can not. It's the difference between networked communities of
power, and individuals who are cut off. This is a distinction too broad
to ignore or postpone.
Consider IM Speak,
the abbreviations that students use in their instant message
conversations. It is, in no small way, a new grammar, and these
students invented it spontaneously in collaboration. The industrial
literacy way would have been to assign a standards committee to
establish a new grammar, and then spend years teaching it in our
classrooms. We should be amazed and in awe of this accomplishment. It
happened not because these kids were digitally literate, but because
being digitally literate meant being part of a network -- a community
of power.
Where is our community of power?" [2 Cents Worth]
David Warlick posted these thoughts in regards to education, but I
think they're very relevant for librarians, too. After all, we're
supposed to be the safety net for the digital divide(s), right, whether
it's access or information literacy? I'm becoming more and more
convinced that libraries will have to find a way to help fill the
coming divide of content-creators (those who think of themselves as
creators with the skills necessary to actually create) versus strictly
consumers (the old model in which the person simply ingests everything
as one-way media and doesn't participate in these new networks and
resources because they can't or didn't even know they could). On the
one side, you have great models like Lane
and Matthew, but on the
other side you have millions of kids I can't even point to because
they're left out of this community.
One model to combat this: Bloomington Public
Library.
Side note: check out this other great post by David: Something
from my Research, which includes the following statement in the
comments (read the post for context):
"I liked these rules because they were worded for the
learner, not against undesired behaviors. They grant students
the right to learn, rather than defining a container within which to
behave like students."
[ The Shifted Librarian]
10:05:22 PM
|
|
and there is listening to librarian's think out loud
(highly recommended)
internet
librarian 05: my keynote
...how much things have changed since the 2003 conference, as evidenced
by things I overheard on Monday morning:
- "yeah, they're talking about social software and blogs and all
that stuff." -- in a classic "that's so 5 minutes ago" voice
- "I flickr'ed a photo of you and Stephen Abrams."
- "it's blah blah flickr blah blah tags blah blah don't be afraid..."
(literally)...
internet
librarian 05: karen schneider on blogging ethics
...On a "micro" level, your blog represents you and everything you're
connected with, including librarianship. Great quote: "For most
readers, you are the last stop between the reader and the truth." From
a utilitarian standpoint, being ethical is a strategic approach.
Information has a long half-life. Being ethical is a form of
self-preservation... "the blogosphere can be cruel. the biblioblogosphere
can be crueler."
On a "macro" level, "The harder we work to make the world a moral
place, the better it is for everyone." She points out that
librarianship is a profession defined by its concern for others -- witness
librarians' willingness to go to jail rather than provide information
about patrons.
She flashes some "rules of blogging," but they're gone before I can
look up from my screen. :)
Five things not to say about your blog
- It's only a blog
- So-and-so does it
- Everyone understood what I meant
- They can always look up
- Nobody trusts the web anyway
Key Rules.... {go, read, enjoy, maybe learn}
[ mamamusings]
"The harder we work to make the world a moral
place, the better it is for everyone."
9:35:18 PM
|
|
Posted by thomas
crampton
Defining the poor is common (The World
Bank's one dollar per day level, for example)
But who are the rich?
If you can read this posting, you are
likely rich.
Anyone with a university education and an
income at or above the lower-middle class level for an OECD country is
rich, I would argue. Being rich is more about having time and freedom
to make choices about your life than bagfulls of money.
Joi's latest
posting may suggest a way to measure wealth through a Technorati
rating!
What is the best metric to define someone
as rich?
9:05:19 PM
|
|
I recommend you read the whole blog entry.
While my dissertation project is not
incredibly obscure, it usually only matters to a small number of
people -- most of whom live in Australia, Papua New Guinea, or Vancouver.
So I've been really amazed to see the New York Times's series on the impact of gold mining that has been running
recently -- suddenly my area of expertise is literally news. How do I feel
about the article, and how do I feel about the gold industry more
generally?
I study the relationship between
indigenous people in Papua New Guinea and the white senior management
of a gold mine that they work with. As someone who had studied
Melanesia for years before I lived there, and who lived in a local
community, the biggest problem I had was fitting in with the white
mining executives and not the local Papua New Guineans. Call it the
narcissism of small difference. Culture shock and fieldwork with Papua
New Guineans was easy in some sense, since no one really expected me to
fit in when I first arrived. Mine management, on the other hand, were
supposedly 'from my culture.' Learning to like and respect these men
(they were almost entirely men) was one of the hardest parts of my
fieldwork. They were mostly Australian and Canadian, and had the usual
Commonwealth suspicion of Yankees. I was an artist and an intellectual,
and over-educated to boot. While many of my informants in the mine had
some form of tertiary education it tended towards the vocational, or
the physical sciences. And they were MEN in
a way that I was not -- they talked about rugby and worked with their
hands and had pictures of naked (or nearly naked) women on their walls,
in there calendars, on their screen savers. And, of course, in the
struggle between landowners and company, I was sympathetic to my
indigenous hosts.
Of course, I can imagine how strange I
must have appeared to them: hopelessly young, over-educated, exotically
Jewish, under-nourished and unshaven. In fact of all of my fieldwork
experiences, one of the things that I am most proud of is the fact that
I established as close a rapport with them as I did. It was, for me,
one of the classical lessons of anthropological relativism: no matter
how savage and barbaric your natives -- in this case, Canadian
capitalists -- may seem to you, you need to learn to understand them....
The power of the Times article comes from
its title: Thirty tons an ounce. The massive amount of effort
undertaken -- and hardship inflicted -- for a single ring's worth of gold is
tremendous. And yet for the post-fieldwork me it is also emblematic of
the nature of the primary industry which supports first world
lifestyles. As one mine executive once remarked to me "if it's not
grown, it's mined." When staring at an open cut or touring float mills
its impossible to escape this fact. But the existence and extent of
primary industry is occluded from the view of most Americans. Times
readers may be disturbed by the process of gold mining, but what this
should really cause them to do is rethink not just gold mining, but
their lifestyle in general. Look up from your computer screen for a
moment and look around the room -- how much metal do you see? Imagine the
copper wires and metal pipes and lines of nails that stretch around you
for thousands of miles. Where did they come from?...
As for me, I own a computer and nice
knives and pots and pans. After two years of living in rural Papua New
Guinea I am more than ready to have the earth pay the price for my
current abode[base ']s indoor plumbing and electrification. But I've never
owned a car, don't want to, and I have various other idiosyncratic
personal commitments to simple living. I know my adopted family in
Papua New Guinea wants the same standard of living that I have (except
for the car part, which they can get behind), and I think they should
have the opportunity to have it as well. I just hope that the readers
of the Time's new series realize, as I did, that they have something to
come to grips with beyond just the problems of the gold industry.
Yes indeed, much to come to grips with.
8:57:34 PM
|
|
Umm, you saw it there 1st.
Ah, you heard it there 1st.
Cool
Project: Wikipedia + Physical World = Semapedia
Here is a cool
project from Vienna. Semapedia
is an attempt to make a location-aware Wikepdia for your cell phone.
From the site:
Our goal is to connect the virtual world with the
physical world by bringing the best information from the internet to
the relevant place in physical space.
We do this as a community by combining the physical annotation
technology of Semacode with the
availability of high quality information using the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia.
Imagine your cellphone as your smart travelguide
File under "Everything Goes Digital Eventually."
(Thanks Bubble
Generation).
[business2blog]
8:26:23 PM
|
|
This story
series discusses the good as well as bad local impacts of a gold
mine in Peru. Also at New
York Times.
Peru
- The Curse of Inca Gold
PBS Frontline, October 2005
High in the Andean mountains of Peru is
a gold mine, Yanacocha, run by
Newmont Mining Corporation of Denver, Colorado, the largest gold mining
company in the world. Once part of the Incan Empire, this land was
conquered by the Spanish, who came in search of gold and silver. ...
The Yanacocha Mine recently celebrated the pouring of its 19 millionth
ounce of gold. It is said to be the world's most productive gold
mine....
"Communities are becoming more and more involved in their own
destinies," says a chastened Kurlander. "When I say a social license, I
mean it. Without the community support, you'll be out of business
eventually. They will force you out of their community, and it doesn't
matter how much government support you have."
[ PBS Frontline]
The
Toxic Shimmer of Gold
Is your gold ring really worth its
weight in gold? When experts include
the risks to the environment and the people living near mine
operations, some say no. A look at the hidden toxic costs of gold
mining....
[ PBS Frontline]
Behind
Gold's Glitter: Torn Lands and Pointed Questions
Some metal mines, including gold mines,
have become the near-equivalent of nuclear waste dumps that must be
tended in perpetuity. Hard-rock mining generates more toxic waste than
any other industry in the United States, according to the Environmental
Protection Agency. The agency estimated last year that the cost of
cleaning up metal mines could reach $54 billion.
[New York Times]
5:41:45 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2005 Russ Savage.
Last update: 12/26/05; 7:27:51 AM.
|
|
| November 2005 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
| 13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
| 20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
| 27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
| Oct Dec |
|
|