Updated: 3/28/2005; 11:20:40 AM.
Mondegreen
Erik Neu's weblog. Focus on current news and political topics, and general-interest Information Technology topics. Some specific topics of interest: Words & Language, everyday economics, requirements engineering, extreme programming, Minnesota, bicycling, refactoring, traffic planning & analysis, Miles Davis, software useability, weblogs, nature vs. nurture, antibiotics, Social Security, tax policy, school choice, student tracking by ability, twins, short-track speed skating, table tennis, great sports stories, PBS, NPR, web search strategies, mortgage industry, mortgage-backed securities, MBTI, Myers-Briggs, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, RPI, Phi Sigma Kappa, digital video, nurtured heart.
        

Sunday, March 14, 2004
trackback []

Clue-less! Clueless web transaction design in the New York State 529 enrollment. I go through a series of enrollment screens, well-designed, no problem. Then, after the final data-entry click, I wait for a few moments, and I'm expecting to be presented with some kind of confirmation screen. But no. Instead, I get an extremely tacky "Upromise Rewards" sign-up screen, with no apparent connection to my transaction.

I happened to know, from my prior research, that Upromise was connected with the NYS 529 plan, but many people wouldn't (the actual investment vehciles are Vanguard funds, which is the most likely thing to notice in research). And even so, I almost bailed at that point. It seemed really unlikely to me that I wasn't going to receive a confirmation screen, but it sure seemed that way. Eventually, I thought to scroll to the bottom (note, I had to scroll), and I noticed a "NEXT" button.

So I was finally taken to the NEXT screen. The worst part is, that wasn't even the confirmation screen for the submitted transaction--it was for the pending transaction. In other words, had I bailed at the Upromise Rewards screen, my enrollment never would have been completed. How dumb can you get?

As an aside, the whole Upromise Rewards thing, even if it were not implemented in a way that risks sabotoging correct user navigation during the essential transaction, is just so tacky. I mean, here I am signing up for a decade-long savings program, in which I will invest tens of thousands of dollars, and they are throwing the moral equivalent of pop-up ads at me! If they absolutely had to pitch their rewards program--I said "If"--they should have relegated it to a bottom-dwelling paragraph with an opt-in checkbox.

(Speaking of tacky--well a name like "Upromise" seems pretty tacky, too.)


7:28:30 PM    comment []
trackback []

TIAA-CREF: a name that is so bad, it's good.
12:36:46 PM    comment []
trackback []

Its astounding how many sites don't have relative font sizes, so that you can increase or decrease (almost always increase, for me at least) the default font size using the View-Text Size menu option. It actually seems much worse now than it was in the early days of the web.
11:49:00 AM    comment []

© Copyright 2005 Erik Neu.
 
March 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Feb   Apr


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "Mondegreen" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Search My Blog