STRAIGHT TRACK : Intercraft Communications for Reality-Based Rails
Updated: 5/25/2005; 4:34:39 PM.

 


LINKS


ARCHIVES

Subscribe to "STRAIGHT TRACK" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

Wednesday, May 05, 2004

Provocative contribution to the discussion from a trusted brother. He describes the past and ongoing sellout and urges that we act quickly to take measures to protect UTU from raiding and prepare for the next round of job losses by getting younger members qualified as locomotive engineers. We also need to unite UTU in some way with BLET and other rail labor.

 

Roger,

 

It has been made clear to me via good source that the UTU's intention all along has been to collaborate with the carriers on RCO to gain favor of representative property votes and take over the BLE. What the RR's want to prove by hook or crook is that RCO develops a long and favorable safety record. Then, once all engines in the near future are equipped with PTC devices and alerters to stop the train if the engineer fails to act, the road conductor will be up for grabs. With this technology in the pipeline the only way to salvage conductor jobs would be to promote them all to engineers and have two engineers in the cab on long runs.

 

The railroads intend to operate eventually with one man only in the yard and on the road. This will reduce current manpower by 60%. The goal of the carrier to eliminate jobs has been advanced by the UTU in order to get the RR's to support their representation vote. The UTU intended all along to give up the jobs as long as they could depend on engineer dues and continuos bribes from the DLC. So the goal of the UTU was income, period, not representation. This is the case that needs to be in court.

 

No doubt the DLC scandal exposed has thrown sand in the gears of the enterprise machine and so have the Teamsters. However, I do not see the BLE/Teamsters advocating engineer/co-engineer Lake Erie type plans, so they may be in the RR's pocket and attempting the same charade the UTU was up to. Clearly it will be absolutely necessary to remove all the bad apples and obviously "shame on you" Paul Thompson will make every effort to do the opposite. It seems the corruption in the UTU has and will continue to benefit only the RR's because nobody has a plan to salvage what's left of our conductor and engineer positions. we will need to redirect the organization and we need to do it quickly!

 

I think we need to stop the raiding by reentering the AFL/CIO and make every effort to get all conductors under 55 engine qualified and promote two man minimum legislation. We would all need to be in the same union and How this will be possible now I do not know but once accomplished an hourly long term agreement might be our best defense.

 

Your thoughts on a solution to the corner misrepresentation has put us in would be appreciated. Copy to Agent X as he has proven to be an astute thinker as well.

 

Thanks
10:21:41 AM    feedback []  trackback []   Google It!

Thanks to Brother Bob Webb for the link to the BMWE's President's Perspective (March-April 2004) describing steps being taken to realize what we have argued for in the past - a grand bargaining coalition of all rail labor. Interesting reading:

"Our merger discussions with the Teamsters are but a part of a larger push for Rail Labor unity this year. In January, the President of the National Conference of Firemen & Oilers (NCF&O), George Francisco, told the Rail Labor union chiefs that in his opinion, a divided Rail Labor would continue to lose at the bargaining table. His proposal was for the unions to agree to bargain as a coalition, pursuing common goals in collective bargaining. While some scoffed at President Francisco’s idea as "pie in the sky," a number of Rail Labor unions agreed to begin discussions regarding collective bargaining. I know that talk of grand bargaining coalitions run through Rail Labor before every round of bargaining – however, this time things will be different.

Since January, a number of Rail Labor unions have met to discuss the form this coalition should take. Everyone participating realizes that Rail Labor needs a structure to achieve its bargaining goals. A loose federation of unions will be unsuccessful because there will be no structure that compels everyone to stay together. What we have been discussing is the creation of a structure that identifies common issues, drafts common Section 6 notices to the carriers and requires that the participants stay together until the agreements are ratified by the respective memberships. That way, the carriers cannot try to pick off a union that is vulnerable or susceptible to a superficially attractive settlement. I call that acting like a union – something the carriers have done for years through the National Carriers’ Conference Committee. It’s about time we did the same thing. The unions will meet again in April to continue this important dialog. Again, I’m very optimistic that in the 2005 round, Rail Labor will be unified to an extent not seen since the late 1970’s. Those of you who can remember back that far, and unfortunately I’m one of them, will remember those contracts contained real wage increases and improvements in rules and benefits. The fact that those agreements were the products of Rail Labor unity was not an unrelated coincidence."

Where is UTU in all of this? It is perhaps unfortunate that this activity is taking place in the context of the IBT, scandalized again with the resignation of the Ethics Overseer and his allegations that Organized Crime still has control of the Teamsters. Hoffa's vision of a "seamless transportation union" and the dream of a grand coalition of rail labor under the umbrella of the IBT Rail Labor Division may be only a pipe dream unless reformists in all organizations work together with the TDU (Teamsters for a Democratic Union.)


9:16:59 AM    feedback []  trackback []   Google It!

© Copyright 2005 The Usual Suspect.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


May 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Apr   Jun


A picture named ROCULogo.jpg







PAST POSTS

2005/05

2005/042005/032005/022004/122004/092004/082004/072004/062004/052004/042004/032004/022004/012003/122003/11