I've been using Apple OS X e-mail client for some months now and I'm very happy with it's spam-filtering technology. However, Mike Scott, AKA Dr Plokta has not had as pleasant an experience.
I've been changing my spam filtering techniques again. Once upon a time, I set up SpamAssassin on my Unix account at plokta.com, with some procmail configuration to filter messages through it appropriately. And it mostly worked, with some false negatives (spam marked as clean) and a few false positives (which are more serious), but I couldn't trust it to delete spam unseen, just to let me filter it to a different mailbox for manual inspection. It took more memory than my quota allowed, and if the reaper (running every thirty seconds) happened to run while it was filtering a message, it was killed and the message wasn't filtered -- but procmail let me run it again if it failed the first time, which fixed that. Then the influential essay A Plan for Spam was published, outlining a plan for building a learning filter using a Bayesian algorithm (which apparently later turned out not to actually be Bayesian). It promised better detection rates than SpamAssassin. So I installed SpamOracle in the shell account, and set to training it. It seemed to work rather better than SpamAssassin, but it was difficult to continue to train it because I was reading my email... [Ask Dr Plokta]
11:44:29 AM Google It!
|
|