onsdag 19. november 2003
This one is via Tore Hoel: Educational Technology Services presents Implementations of the IMS Learning Design Specification Friday, November 14th, 2003

Go back in time and take a look at the Webcast
Listen to Bill Olivier from CETIS talking about Learning Design, and James Dalziel demonstrating the Learning Activity Management System (LAMS).
3:24:57 PM  #  

Kjære Julenissen...........
1:01:42 PM  #  

New from Bersin & Associates:
Training Analytics: How Do Companies Measure Training and ROI? What they found was "that companies are keenly interested in measuring business impact from training (Kirkpatrick Level 3 and 4) yet struggle with a clear lack of methodologies and tools. Most companies spend 1%-3% of their overall training budget on measurement but have a strong interest in spending more. LMS systems, while often purchased for the purpose of measuring training operations, are falling short in providing this capability".
Download PDF 183 kB (10 pages)
12:46:06 PM  #  
Via elearningpost, denne måtte jeg bare peke til:

Learning Circuits: We are the Problem: We are selling Snake Oil

This is a widely linked article listing the things wrong with the training industry. "The problem is not "out there". We are the problem. We are selling snake oil. We now have ample data to show that:

  • Training does not work
  • eLearning does not work
  • Blending Learning does not work
  • Knowledge Management does not work

[elearningpost]
10:48:06 AM  #  
Jeg har redigert denne posten og lagt inn lenken til John Robbs post.

Dave Winer: A picture named marca.jpgThe possibility that talk of Microsoft buying Google was hype hadn't occurred to me until I read John's post. And I would have rejected the theory if I hadn't read another piece in the last few days that said that Netscape's bluster about killing Microsoft served KPCB, it made the Netscape IPO super-hot, and that made them billions of dollars. Previously I had taken them at face value, assuming their goal with Netscape was to build a real company, and that they were surprised when the stock took off, but why assume that? Maybe they were hyping all along and Andreessen was just following orders. In any case with Gates on the record saying there were no discussions about Microsoft acquiring Google, one has to wonder, how did the rumor start? [Scripting News]
10:32:43 AM  #