Received a comment on a previous post on the InFusion announcement.
Here's the post:
I've got some news for Invensys, any SAP integration strategy predicated on SAP NetWeaver (as theirs claims to be) is going to neither "easy" nor "cheap". Today, SAP has 110,000+ SAP R/3 installations of which only 2,500 are reference-able NetWeaver installations - do the math. Even if SAP gives NetWeaver away for free, it's a long, costly and complicated process to implement it. In general, throwing XML at SAP R/3 and calling it an integration strategy is like trying to get into a building by smashing thru a side wall. If you try hard enough you'll probably get in, but to qualify as a "strategy" you probably ought to figure out how to use the front door.
This is probably a valid point. I didn't ask the question in public, because what are they really going to say? But I think the numbers this person (nameless, but a soccer person, so not all bad) cites are a little misleading. Automated integration with SAP is a very new process. I doubt that many have finished projects. On the other hand, every automation company I talk with is trying to do this. If you are not, then you'll be left behind. Personally, I'd rather see it with standards than with specially developed software.
I did point out the obvious to Mike Caliel and Mike Bradley--that if this new product is going to succeed, it must be easy to use and install.
5:01:42 PM
|
|