Steve's No Direction Home Page :
If he needs a third eye, he just grows it.
Updated: 10/23/2004; 12:27:57 PM.

 

Subscribe to "Steve's No Direction Home Page" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 
 


Tuesday, September 09, 2003

Socrates' Three Filters

My old pal Bob has been studying philosophy, and forwards this story. A fascinating parable:

In ancient Greece (469 - 399 BC), Socrates was well known for his
wisdom. One day the great philosopher came upon an acquaintance who
said excitedly, "Socrates, do you know what I just heard about one of
your students?"

"Wait a moment," Socrates replied. "Before telling me anything I'd like
You to pass a little test. It's called the Triple Filter Test."

"Triple filter?"

"That's right," Socrates continued "Before you talk to me about my
student, it might be a good idea to take a moment and filter what you're
going to say..

The first filter is Truth. Have you made absolutely sure that what you
are about to tell me is true?"

"No," the man said, "actually I just heard about it and ..."

"All right," said Socrates. "So you don't really know if it's true or
not. Now let's try the second filter, the filter of Goodness. Is what
you are about to tell me about my student something good?"

"No, on the contrary ..."

"So," Socrates continued, "you want to tell me something bad about him,
but you're not certain it's true. You may still pass the test though,
because there's one filter left: the filter of Usefulness. Is what you
want to tell me about my student going to be useful to me?"

"No, not really."

"Well," concluded Socrates, "if what you want to tell me is neither true
nor good nor even useful, why tell it to me at all?"

This is why Socrates was a great philosopher and held in such high
esteem.

It also explains why he never found out that Plato was banging his wife.


9:22:39 PM  Permalink  comment []

The New Yorker

I don't often buy The New Yorker, there's just too much in there to read. But something caught my eye about the September 15 issue, and I picked it up today and just finished reading nearly everything in it. It's a jem. First is a story by Victor Erofeyev about mat Russian obscenity, and the unusual place it holds in society. Totally repressed, it's like an underground vernacular that absolutely cannot be used in society. Mat is  focused on sexual matters, and there are few scatalogical cursewords in the language (move subtitles use Damn or something like it where we use "shit").  "Gogol , for instance, was obliged to omit the disdainful exclamantion "Nozdrya!" -- literally, "Nostril!" -- from his novel "Dead Souls" because of its distant echo of the word pizda [cunt]."

Dan Baum writes a piece on Jake Leg, a medical catastrophe which is expressed in blues lyrics, such as Jake Walk Blues by the Allen Brothers, from 1931: "I can't eat, I can't talk, drinking mean Jake, Lord, I can't walk." I haven't read all this piece yet.

The centerpiece is Peter Boyer's long discussion of Mel Gibson's The Crucifixion, the movie without a distributor. Accused of everything from anti-semitism to Catholic fundamentalism, the movie sounds really fascinating. It's a rather bizarre portrait (to this apostate Catholic) of Gibson, too.

Louis Menand, who I know of, but don't remember reading before, writes a nice essay about "The Manchurian Candidate," the book more than the movie. I have to read more Menand (and, I guess, The New Yorker); the writing is great, and he brings lots of fun research to the story. I was a minor fan of Richard Condon, who wrote the book, when I was in high school. Speaking of Condon's prose, Menand writes, "some people like their bananas ripe to the point of blackness," which is how I like my bananas from time to time, if not all the time. Lots of nice turns of phrase in the piece.

Finally, there are reviews of the new Paul Krugman book, a play about Dalton Trumbo, "Lost in Translation," and "Dirty Prettty Things." I have both those movies in my list of movies to see, and the reviews are intriguing. Tomorrow on BART, finish off the Jake Leg piece, and skim the one on Daniel Libeskind building at Ground Zero...

9:17:21 PM  Permalink  comment []



Bloom County's Opus returning to Sunday comics this fall [FARK]

Great news! Can you take the hint Gary Larson and Bill Watterson?

6:27:23 PM  Permalink  comment []



two links. The best of this week's Internet:

1. Shaun, you pay for your own fucking drugs in future

2. Recipe of the day.

Thankyou. [blogjam]
Correct. There's no reason to create any new web content this week. Everybody go home.
5:36:22 PM  Permalink  comment []

Comical Rummi and WSJ

The Wall Street Journal's online editorial page is rather hysterical today. First they cite a poll showng that over 60% of American's think Saddam was behind 9/11 as proof, somehow, that he was. They also say that further proof is that he was bragging about it on the first anniversary (not thinking that perhaps he was trying to take credit for something after the fact). It's really a very funny piece all the way through, I don't think intentionally.

But it does provide one piece of intentional humor, a link to this headlne: US, EU Butt Heads On Airline Info, wondering what Beavis things of things.


3:02:19 PM  Permalink  comment []



Presidential Character. President Bush refuses to risk his political popularity with the same aggression that he risks the country's economic stability and international credibility. [New York Times: Politics]
Not to put too fine a point on it...
12:35:11 PM  Permalink  comment []



[The Singularity] Exploring the 'Singularity'.
[KurzweilAI.net (scraped)]
Mind-blowing stuff.
12:31:54 PM  Permalink  comment []

Larry McCaffery's "20th C. Greatest Hits" Larry McCaffery's "20th C. Greatest Hits" Larry McCaffery's

Pedantry alert: Here's an interesting list of the 100 "greatest hits" of 20th Century English Fiction. Fun reading; it's very nice to see a list like this populated with great science fiction works, Dashiell Hammet and the like. But reading the list is seriously marred by dopey errors in the titles of books. I like the way they title Joyce's last work "Finnegans' Wake." Apparently whoever wrote this text knew there was something you were supposed to remember about the apostrophe in that title, but coudn't remember exactly what it was. (For the record, there is no apostrophe; it should read "Finnegans Wake.") Also, the title of Flann O'Brien's masterpiece is "At Swim-Two-Birds," the hyphens matter; Swim-Two-Birds is a place.
9:03:49 AM  Permalink  comment []



Gold Finger?.

“Remove the PCI slot panel cover(nomatter it with screw or not,if with screw please keep the screw if not with screw please check the system parts box and find out the screw), and plug the QX-1004 on PCI slot with right position,please check the QX-1004 PCI bus (gold finger) is all plug into the PCI slot, put the screw to fix the card on the case.”

Speaking of clear, concise instructional text... I stumbled acros the "Worst Documentation of 2003 Awards" -- an annual look at horrendous writing hosted by Technical Standards, Inc. Funny, funny stuff.

[Jeffrey Veen]

I actually have one of these products!
8:49:29 AM  Permalink  comment []



© Copyright 2004 Steve Michel.



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.
 


September 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Aug   Oct

      EV