Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog
Computers, freedom, and anything else that comes to mind.









Subscribe to "Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Monday, August 15, 2005
 

The following was posted on the smith2004-discuss mailing list. I have no idea if the information is accurate, but it would certainly be interesting if it were.

Anybody here have any way to confirm this stuff?

http://www.freeliberal.com/archives/001172.html

Hello Qaddafi!

By Michael Gilson De Lemos

For many years I've been an interested observer of Libya's leader, Omar Qaddafi. On one level he's some crazy desert thug who keeps people perplexed with contrarian rhetoric that makes Stalin look like a stutterer.

But, Qaddafi is ruthlessly presented in the American press and political establishment as someone to be ignored, a political buffoon, a Charlie Chaplin as the Great Dictator in sinister African robes, constantly intriguing against all freedom and supporting spectacular, if ultimately futile terrorist ventures. Unlike dictators that the US government lavishly supports with vast foreign aid schemes, naturally.

Meanwhile, we free Americans were until recently denied the opportunity to see for ourselves thanks to US Government travel embargos.

Reason enough to be skeptics. Perhaps the man is bad and his country has gone nuts--but comparatively that bad, that nuts? Or has something else been going on as well?

Or is some of the problem that he utters some good sense from time to time, from a political position that the political machine is useless?

Qaddafi came to power in a US supported coup. He then annoyed the US by declaring the ownership of foreign business combines as questionable seizures of Libya's oil wealth and their contracts with the previous monarch invalid. He then really began to worry people in Washington when he declared his revolution aimed at a social anarchist utopia. Socialist they could stand. But∑anarchist?

Now, every time you hear for a few months about what a bad, bad, bad regime they have there, he or his anarchist government utter some confounding statement or foreign travelers issue some favorable and startlingùor simply unremarkable-- report, such as the old "Lonely Planet" guides.

Organizations like the American-Libyan Freedom Alliance want you to know that life isn't perfect in Libya, but it doesn't seem to be to the right of Nazi Germany; or considering the regimes Washington was supporting when it started denouncing Libya, a clear target for special criticism.

Nor does Qaddafi seem entirely mad or stupid in a dictator sort of way. As noted in the movie "Broadcast News", interviewers find him 'presidential' and sometimes profound.

He even wrote a fascinating set of surrealist stories and essays for his supporters, "Escape To Hell" satirizing power and authority. The quirky stories would do credit to a science fiction writer in the US. None other than JFK advisor Pierre Salinger wrote a favorable introduction to the English edition.

It's true that the sharia system of common law in Libya has resulted in cases that have brought outcries from Amnesty International. Yet under his influence, it's improved over 2 generations--compared to 800 years of Anglo-American common law, which now seems to be going backward, as in the shocking treatment of divorced fathers, our draconian prison terms, government officials implying a little judicious torture is All-American, and the US Supreme Court declaring that property can be expropriated to raise taxes. Meanwhile Qaddafi states that he thinks communism stinks.

ANARCHIST MANQUE

There is more.

Qaddafi and his followers created a set-up presented as wild-eyed national Arabic socialismùcalled Jamahiriya-- but suspiciously similar to New England town meetings to run the country on a local level. It is creaky and sometimes brings out the worst in people's conformism, and there are reports of spying and secret police up there with Cuba, but according to many people who have left Libya, it overall works and educates people on making decisions and finding out facts for themselves.

Some say that considering people were cutting each other's throats before Qaddafi, it was just the thing.

Then Qaddafi announced he was resigning all but honorary positions. He warned people that democratic government to oppress each other was an illusion. He didn't even promote himself to general. He went to live in a tent. There his family was bombed by US planes for a terrorist attack that has since been admitted to likely have had nothing to do with him.

Meanwhile wave two of his anarchist revolution is responding to the empowered population's cry for free enterprise. This anarchist urge with a low-key libertarian whiff keeps popping up. Qaddafi's suggested the ideal form of society is a mix of free-enterprise, tolerance, and no government.

To this end he's declared the government abolished 3 times, urging the people to complain to themselves and solve problems on their own. Alas, it keeps creeping back, but in the process he's abolished more of the government, than, say, any US President in the last 150 years.

Even REASON magazine has begun to wonder, noting satirically in a 2003 article that at least he cut more intrusive programs than, say, futurist and small-government proponent manque Newt Gingrich, despite enjoying a strongly positioned Republican Congress. After all, as Nancy Reagan is given to saying about other addictions, they could have just said "No."

Just when you think it's safe to make fun of him, in fact, there he goes again. He's proposed, instead of expanding the UN, arbitrators composed of international elder statesmen to mediate international disputes. Something like that certainly worked for the Roman Empire, whose former consuls, called consulars, traveled the empire and beyond as arbitrators for many years. A grandfatherly chat with Gorbachev and other free-lance arbitrators roving about instead of expanding UN armies? It sounds somewhat reasonable in an anarchist sort of way.

He's urged his people to give up nuclear weapons, which is more than we can say for other bigger countries.

Is Qaddafi a secret hero, a liberty lover born in a backward land and struggling to break free? Well, at worst he won't be the first ruler to learn from his mistakes.

AFRICA WITHOUT AID?

And now, we're witnessing an orgy of feel-good promises on more programs from the governments of industrialized countries that will more or less end up in the pockets of the real causes of Africa's woes. These are not famine, not locust plagues, not debt, not some mysterious need for infrastructure of superhighways to sleepy tribal villages, but the dictators. Real Dictators, who don't even pretend to hold town-meetings, all using the latest socialist thinking of 1930, and the local intellectuals who excuse them...and suddenly, why Qaddafi says it's stupid.

What Africa needs, says Qaddafi, is to get rid of trade barriers and open its government borders, become a United States of Africa confederation, and get rid of tariffs, get rid of import taxes, paralyzing to business controls, and all that planning garbage. All these aid programs, he implies, are Trojan horses for more government and international, not local, control. True, he did say that any unity model was worth looking at, but his preference seemed clear. Naturally, international opinion is appalled, and the African dictators were very dismayed, though polite.

What is worse, in a continent riven by invasions and obscure-sounding tribal wars that become mass genocides, he suggested that as trade expands, peace will "break out."

Lest anyone think he's fooling, after a process of local debate, The English-Language Bahrain Tribune announces Libya is abolishing its import dutiesùall of themùexcept on cigarettes (which, given the policy of its neighbor Spain, is comprehensible). Considering that in the US often over half of what we pay for products such as sugar is due to the influence of import duties, this is something.

Plus, while they're at it, they're going to try to abolish the government-- againùthis time by privatizing remaining government agencies, including handover to popular co-ops, not just somebody's friend.

Qaddafi claiming free trade means establishing harmony∑ and making government wars, taxes, and borders irrelevant? A United States of Abolished States? The nerve.

Or perhaps the politics of the surreal, from a surrealist writer, in a surreal age.

One thing is for certain, if the UN trade czars and leaders of world governments didn't think he was crazy, they're surely thinking about it now.

Michael Gilson-De Lemos is a founder of the Libertarian International Organization and co-hosts FreedomWorks!, a weekly radio show on 3 stations in the Tampa, Florida area webcast worldwide.


10:36:52 PM    comment ()

SHIFTING TIDES: CINDY SHEEHAN IS NOT ALONE. Here's another part of the Cindy Sheehan story that most Bush supporters can't acknowledge or answer: the evidence mounts that Cindy Sheehan is hardly alone in her opposition to Bush's war of choice, and this is true even for many military families.

For example:

In a departure from past policies, newspapers around the country, with the U.S. [...] [The Light Of Reason]

More along the same line as this earlier post.
10:12:45 PM    comment ()


Blogs have many uses.

Kathleen and Eric got married in a blog ceremony...

I promise to love, honor, and obey cherish you, in sickness and in health, in poverty and wealth, in times of sorrow and times of joy. I will be your friend, your lover, your confidant. I promise to never stop trying to become the patient, understanding man you deserve.

Love,
Your husband
Eric

The happy couple explains:

The state of Texas has a little known law governing "informal marriage". For a marriage to be legal, we must publicly declare that we consider each other as spouses and this fact be known to other residents of the state of Texas. We got our certificate this afternoon and have now fulfilled the requirements as there's bound to be a Texas resident or two amongst our joint readership. Feel free to witness our marriage here.
[BloggerdyDoc]

Some months ago I read a discussion of whether a marriage ceremony taking place in an online RPG could be a valid marriage in the real world (assuming those involved wanted it to be, of course). It would appear that if the couple live in Texas, and there are other Texas residents present in the game, it could be.
9:51:23 PM    comment ()


Lucky You, George. In explaining why he refuses to meet Cindy Sheehan, George Bush let out one of his frequent verbal gaffes- but this one was more damaging than all of the others that merely showed his poor syntax. While he understood that there are citizens 'who have got something to say,' the president added,

"...I think it's also important for me to go on with my life, to keep a balanced life."

Exactly, George. The fact that hundreds of protesters are currently waiting outside your door... [Antiwar.com Blog]

Wrapped up in its own rhetoric and dark pathologies, the government can no longer imagine spontaneity, sincerity, heart, and a desire for justice as motivating factors in human behavior. The ordinary citizens amassed in Crawford now are showing them that the old American values still exist. And that's something for these cowardly hypocrites to be afraid of.

10:45:56 AM    comment ()


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Ken Hagler.
Last update: 2/15/2006; 2:05:52 PM.
August 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jul   Sep