Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog
Computers, freedom, and anything else that comes to mind.









Friday, March 03, 2006
 

Prying Eyes.

Homeland Security's watching:

The balance on their JCPenney Platinum MasterCard had gotten to an unhealthy level. So they sent in a large payment, a check for $6,522.

And an alarm went off. A red flag went up. The Soehnges' behavior was found questionable.

And all they did was pay down their debt. They didn't call a suspected terrorist on their cell phone. They didn't try to sneak a machine gun through customs.

They just paid a hefty chunk of their credit card balance. And they learned how frighteningly wide the net of suspicion has been cast.

After sending in the check, they checked online to see if their account had been duly credited. They learned that the check had arrived, but the amount available for credit on their account hadn't changed.

[...]

They were told, as they moved up the managerial ladder at the call center, that the amount they had sent in was much larger than their normal monthly payment. And if the increase hits a certain percentage higher than that normal payment, Homeland Security has to be notified. And the money doesn't move until the threat alert is lifted.

Walter called television stations, the American Civil Liberties Union and me. And he went on the Internet to see what he could learn. He learned about changes in something called the Bank Privacy Act.

"The more I'm on, the scarier it gets," he said. "It's scary how easily someone in Homeland Security can get permission to spy."

Doesn't really seem so scary until it happens to you.

Thanks to James Lippard for the tip.

TrackBack (0) | [The Agitator]
4:25:35 PM    comment () trackback ()


The Ten Patriots Who Voted Against the Patriot Act.

In a vote of 89 - 10, the United States Senate today overwhelmingly approved reauthorization of 16 Patriot Act provisions. In the deal, 14 will become permanent, with two more requiring reauthorization in another four years.

Below is the list of the 10 patriots who voted against the reauthorization.

Akaka (D-HI)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Byrd (D-WV)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Murray (D-WA)
Wyden (D-OR)

If you vote, consider supporting these senators if they stand for re-election.

[Police State USA]

The socialist trash who "represent" California are, naturally, not on this list. I was pleased to see that both senators from Vermont did vote against it, though.
2:53:21 PM    comment () trackback ()


Quiting HIV. On today's LRC an establishment HIV researcher, Rebecca Culshaw, in Why I Quit HIV explains how she has come to realize that this government-announced cause of AIDS is wrong. Read it. She gives a moving account of how the HIV-causes-AIDS... By Donald Miller. [LewRockwell.com Blog]

A very interesting article, but I think there's more to this than just government action, as Miller suggests. There are definitely other political factors involved in the whole HIV/AIDS story.

When AIDS was first discovered, there were plenty of bigots saying that it was "god's punishment" and that the people who had it (being mostly young gay men and heavy drug users) deserved to die. Naturally the bigots didn't want a whole lot of time and money spent finding a cure, because they wanted the people with AIDS dead anyway.

In reaction, a considerable amount of effort was spent on "education" telling people that everyone could get AIDS, regardless of their lifestyle. This lead to considerable panic (as the article notes) and a whole lot of research funding, as the general public were convinced that they were in danger, and not just those "yucky" gay people who they didn't care about anyway.

Now considerable time has passed, and although the conventional wisdom that anyone can get AIDS seems to be holding, anyone who actually pays attention (which does, sadly, include the bigots) has noticed that in reality the warnings of suburban housewives with AIDS never came to pass--regardless of what causes it, AIDS never really moved out of the groups were it was discovered.

My theory is that this is where the vigorous defense of the theory that HIV causes AIDS comes from. People are afraid that the bigots (who never really wanted people with AIDS to survive anyway) will shut down all that funding they've been getting if they can convince the general public that they really don't have anything to fear after all.

That is probably a justified concern. If it's determined that AIDS is dependent on lifestyle after all, that huge funding will almost certain dry up, because the sad reality is that even if they're not actively bigoted, most Americans don't really care one way or the other if a bunch of gay men and drug addicts die or not. Obviously it's in the interests of gay rights activists to promote the HIV causes AIDS theory, simply to preserve research funding.

The sad thing is that if the theory is wrong (which does, from what I've read, appear likely), then the treatments are actually killing people who could have lived long and happy lives just by cutting back on the excess a bit.

Unfortunately this possibility will likely keep the HIV-causing theory going for the foreseeable future, even if it is indeed proven false, because most of those gay rights activists and AIDS researchers won't be able to face the knowledge that the work they've spent 20 years of their lives on has actually been killing the people they've been trying to help. Just look at the way there are so many socialists around today, still in denial over the horrific slaughter their beliefs cause.
12:18:41 PM    comment () trackback ()


More Stuff the Tinfoil Hat Crowd Couldn't Have Dreamt Up.

Yikes:

The large, black SUV passed the woman on the left, abruptly slowed down, and then dropped behind her. Suddenly, flashing red and blue lights lit up her rearview mirror.

"Ma'am, you were pulled over because you set off a nuclear radioactive alarm," a man dressed in a blue jumpsuit-type uniform and a baseball cap said in a monotone.

t sounds like a scene from the movie "Men in Black." A select group of state troopers and inspectors from the state Department of Motor Vehicles now wear ultra-sensitive, portable radiation detectors on their belts to check for dangerous materials inside large trucks.

But the 45-year-old Suffield woman wasn't hauling nuclear waste. She had been injected with a radioactive substance for a common medical test.

Sounds like they need to set the calibration back just a bit.

TrackBack (0) | [The Agitator]

I wonder if the tritium in my watch would set one of these off.
10:38:15 AM    comment () trackback ()


Ron Paul Predicts Impeachment.

From PrisonPlanet.com:

Republican Congressman Predicts Bush Impeachment
Says US close to dictatorship

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | March 3 2006

Republican Congressman Ron Paul has gone on record with his prediction that the impeachment of George W. Bush is right around the corner but warned that in the meantime the US was slipping perilously close to a dictatorship.

[Mises Economics Blog]

The article does clarify that this depends on the Democrats getting control of Congress. I don't know how likely that is, but the established precedent is that a president can confess to a crime on national television and get away with it, as long as his faction of the Boot On Your Neck Party controls Congress.
10:36:43 AM    comment () trackback ()



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Ken Hagler.
Last update: 4/3/2006; 11:33:17 AM.
March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Feb   Apr


Subscribe to "Ken Hagler's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.