Updated: 20/11/2002; 09:52:46 AM.
deepContent.weblog
Thinking about this communication thing we do, and how to make it all work better, innit?

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this weblog are solely those of the writer and are not in any way those of any firm or any other individuals that he may or may not have a working or other kind of relationship with in any way, shape or form.
        

Tuesday, 27 August 2002

I hope this situation does not also apply in Australia!
10:47:49 AM    Add a comment.

XHTML 1.0 is the bridge between old style HTML, now too useless to use, and the new XML web. XHTML 2.0 is the next step, but is there a cause for concern in a line in the XHTML 2.0 specification?
“I’m really hesitant over the line in the new spec (v2) that reads, ‘While the ancestry of XHTML 2 comes from HTML 4, XHTML 1.0, and XHTML 1.1, it is not intended to be backward compatible with its earlier versions,’” Frances Currit-Dhaseleer, a technical trainer and Webmaster in Colorado Springs, said.
      But, on a more positive note…
“HTML is dead,” said Uttam Narsu, an analyst with the Giga Information Group. “Web developers have to accept this and move on to XHTML.”
      Along those lines, XHTML 2.0 offers a trio of new capabilities that may entice Web developers to start making the switch before they absolutely have to.

10:36:54 AM    Add a comment.

I came across this weblog—xBlog: The visual thinking weblog—courtesy of Zeldman. Well worth regular reading.
10:23:05 AM    Add a comment.

© Copyright 2002 Karl-Peter Gottschalk.
 
August 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jul   Sep







































































Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "deepContent.weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.